IBM B2B Integrator vs Oracle BI Applications comparison

IBM and Oracle are both solutions in the Business-to-Business Middleware category. IBM is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.3, while Oracle is ranked #16. IBM holds a 6.7% mindshare in BBM, compared to Oracle’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

IBM B2B Integrator

Read 47 IBM B2B Integrator reviews

1,459 Views
1,094 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Oracle BI Applications

Read 6 Oracle BI Applications reviews

327 Views
324 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

IBM B2B Integrator

Oracle BI Applications

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 27, 2025

IBM B2B Integrator and Oracle BI Applications are complementary products operating in different categories. IBM B2B Integrator appears to have an edge in pricing and support, while Oracle BI Applications excels with its robust features and value.

Features: IBM B2B Integrator facilitates seamless cross-company data transactions, supports secure communication protocols, and offers flexibility in integration. Oracle BI Applications provides comprehensive analytics, advanced reporting capabilities, and data visualization options.

Room for Improvement: IBM B2B Integrator could enhance user interface simplicity, broader protocol support, and quicker deployment times. Oracle BI Applications might improve integration with non-Oracle systems, streamline customization processes, and reduce the complexity of report building.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM B2B Integrator offers a scalable deployment model tailored for complex integrations, with supportive customer service. Oracle BI Applications emphasizes a straightforward deployment process and strong customer support, enabling quicker adoption.

Pricing and ROI: IBM B2B Integrator is recognized for competitive pricing and favorable ROI due to lower initial setup costs. Oracle BI Applications entails a higher initial investment, justified by its extensive analytical capabilities that enhance long-term earnings through data-driven decision-making.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM B2B Integrator vs. Oracle BI Applications Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

IBM B2B Integrator vs. Oracle BI Applications

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,594 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM B2B Integrator

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle BI Applications

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

16th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Business-to-Business Middleware category, the mindshare of IBM B2B Integrator is 6.7%, up from 6.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle BI Applications is 1.9%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business-to-Business Middleware Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
IBM B2B Integrator	6.7%
Oracle BI Applications	1.9%
Other	91.4%

Business-to-Business Middleware

Featured Reviews

reviewer2742345

General Manager Neverhack Spain at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees

Experience with robust integrator reveals strong performance and potential for interface updates

Based on my experience and my clients' feedback, there are a few points IBM can improve for IBM B2B Integrator. One of these is the graphical user interface. For several years, IBM has been promising to renew this interface, which has an ancient, old aesthetic, though it contains many functionalities. Creating a new interface would incur a very high internal cost with no new profitability for IBM. This is one of the points where customers say it feels like working in the 1990s with this interface. Another significant issue is that the platform is not multi-tenant. It's not possible to have different tenants in the cloud. This creates problems when trying to create SaaS offers based on IBM B2B Integrator, as there is the possibility that some workflow for a customer can be visible to another one. Since it's not multi-tenant, it's running on the same tenant of the platform. This is the main issue that the platform has.

Read full review

Rehman Mohar

Senior Manager, Software Engineering Client Reporting at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Fast calculations, stable, and good support, but needs more visuals, support for HTML5, and BI Publisher updates

It is very cumbersome and slow for making any changes. It doesn't have that many visuals to show different graphs and charts. It should have more visuals. It also doesn't support HTML5, which is useful for interactive sessions and reporting with dashboard etc. We are phasing it out because we need a newer platform that provides us more flexibility and more designs. Our use case is just to get the utility type of monthly reports, and we need visuals, customizations, columns, and certain sections on the report to show performance and other things. They are not updating their BI Publisher product, which was known as XML Publisher before Oracle bought it. It could be because they don't have that many clients using it. We are using it because we have this solution for years.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's highly stable, and the redundancy is amazing. B2B Integrator also has a high availability option to work in a cluster environment. You rarely have issues operating it because of the HA."

"IBM B2B Integrator is a great tool, robust, reliable, low-maintenance, and ideal solution."

"There are also different tabs where we can check the status of file transfers and business processes, and we can monitor adapters and services in the link."

"This solution allows for easy integration with heterogeneous applications."

"B2B Integrator is multi-platform, so it can be integrated with Windows, Unix, or whatever, and it can work with almost all programming languages. It can also transfer a lot of data in a short time. For instance, a system I recently implemented exchanges about 20 million files a day."

"It is easy of use and it's easy to maintain. It's also faster to on-board partners."

"The most valuable features are the flexibility and the range of EDI standards that IBM Sterling can handle."

"The solution offers good integration capabilities."

More IBM B2B Integrator pros

"Calculations are a little bit faster. It can do the on-the-run calculations much better than other reporting platforms. You don't need any other specific tool. You can use Microsoft Office to start doing things with these reports."

"It's web-based so that I can have multiple users accessing the same data. It provides ease of use and its formatting means we can use the data, export it to Excel, and we manipulate the data afterward if we need to."

"The most valuable features are the reporting and the graphics."

"It has a very robust dashboard and ad-hoc reporting."

Cons

"The one thing that is lacking is easy visibility. It's hard to provide business users with a view into the statuses of their transactions."

"The reporting features could be better. right now, they are lacking a bit."

"The mapping, visibility, deployment, and the dashboard could be improved and updated. The communication logs are very poor. They are not easily understood, and we need to navigate to many places for many reasons. You can't just pull the information; it's very tough."

"The web interface of B2B is quite outdated and not particularly user-friendly."

"API integration could be improved. The legacy system could be on the cloud."

"It supports many of our use cases but falls short in some areas as technology evolves"

"The initial setup is complex."

"When working on an elaborate rule, I end up creating it in notepad and then pasting it into the Extended Rule window, which is not convenient."

More IBM B2B Integrator cons

"The initial setup was difficult because not all the information was included in the implementation model."

"The initial setup was complex and it took a lot of time to set up the infrastructure."

"It is very cumbersome and slow for making any changes. It doesn't have that many visuals to show different graphs and charts. It should have more visuals. It also doesn't support HTML5, which is useful for interactive sessions and reporting with dashboard etc. We are phasing it out because we need a newer platform that provides us more flexibility and more designs. Our use case is just to get the utility type of monthly reports, and we need visuals, customizations, columns, and certain sections on the report to show performance and other things. They are not updating their BI Publisher product, which was known as XML Publisher before Oracle bought it. It could be because they don't have that many clients using it. We are using it because we have this solution for years."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is based on how many cores are used and the type of cores."

"Licensing depends upon the package you opt for within the solution. The solution is a bit costly compared to the other integration tools in the market."

"We pay an annual fee based on the number of VPUs. It's fairly reasonable. We're in the middle of analyzing other products, and they're all pretty much in the same range."

"The solution is priced at $20,000 to $30,000 per year with no extra costs."

"The price of IBM B2B Integrator is too high. However, IBM may be willing to give a discount if there are negotiations. If they see that there is a good opportunity for them they can provide a discount."

"The product costs more than 40K."

"As with any case study that we’ve ever done, it’s not so much a problem with the application or security or anything of that nature. It’s basically the cost infrastructure. Compared to other solutions, it’s one of the more costly solutions out there. It’s the biggest concern nowadays that upper management has."

"It is expensive. It is more than 100K for support. You pay for support on top of the standard licensing, which is on a yearly basis."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,594 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Wholesaler/Distributor

Marketing Services Firm

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	32

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM B2B Integrator?

Regarding pricing, IBM B2B Integrator rates in the middle range. This integrator has embedded all the functionality needed to handle files and messages. It tends to be very expensive because the IB...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM B2B Integrator?

From the automation perspective, IBM B2B Integrator has its own powerful workflow, but compared to other applications such as MuleSoft or Boomi, they have many cloud connectors and multiple connect...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM B2B Integrator?

IBM B2B Integrator is majorly used in banks for managed file transfer, integrating with their external and internal applications for large files, especially huge files which need to be transferred,...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs IBM B2B Integrator

Compared 18% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs IBM B2B Integrator

Compared 15% of the time

Mule ESB vs IBM B2B Integrator

Compared 14% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs IBM B2B Integrator

Compared 7% of the time

Cleo Integration Cloud Platform vs IBM B2B Integrator

Compared 6% of the time

More IBM B2B Integrator Competitors

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs Oracle BI Applications

Compared 40% of the time

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs Oracle BI Applications

Compared 34% of the time

IBM B2B Cloud Services vs Oracle BI Applications

Compared 26% of the time

More Oracle BI Applications Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM B2B Integrator

February 2026

Download IBM B2B Integrator product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle BI Applications

February 2026

Download Oracle BI Applications product report

Also Known As

IBM Sterling B2B Integrator, Sterling Gentran Integration Suite

No data available

Overview

IBM B2B Integrator helps you securely integrate complex B2B processes with your partner communities. It provides a single, flexible B2B gateway that enables your organization to meet a wide range of B2B integration needs. The solution can improve business processes beyond enterprise boundaries and increase visibility into and across supply and demand chains.

IBM

Oracle Business Intelligence (BI) Applications are complete, prebuilt BI solutions that deliver intuitive, role-based intelligence throughout an organization. These solutions enable organizations to gain more insight and greater value from a range of data sources, including Oracle Fusion Cloud and On-Premise Applications, E-Business Suite, PeopleSoft, JD Edwards, Siebel, and third party systems. Oracle BI Applications are built on the Oracle BI Foundation, a comprehensive and market leading BI platform. This enables organizations to realize the value of a packaged BI application, such as rapid deployment, lower TCO, and built-in best practices, all on one common BI Foundation.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Bonnie Plants, Toshiba Europe, Florida Hospital

Cox Enterprises, Lochbridge

Buyer's Guide

IBM B2B Integrator vs. Oracle BI Applications

February 2026

Free Report: IBM B2B Integrator vs. Oracle BI Applications

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM B2B Integrator vs. Oracle BI Applications and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,594 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM B2B Integrator vs. Oracle BI Applications report.

See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.