Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

HYPR vs Transmit Security comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

HYPR
Ranking in Passwordless Authentication
4th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Transmit Security
Ranking in Passwordless Authentication
5th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Remote Access (25th), Identity Management (IM) (24th), Access Management (20th), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (11th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Passwordless Authentication category, the mindshare of HYPR is 14.1%, down from 22.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Transmit Security is 4.8%, down from 4.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Passwordless Authentication Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
HYPR14.1%
Transmit Security4.8%
Other81.1%
Passwordless Authentication
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2804310 - PeerSpot reviewer
Lead Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Journey orchestration has improved fraud prevention but still needs shared rules and better usability
The main improvement needed is that with the tool, you have to build rules for each and every application. There is no common place where you can write the rules and use that rule for all your applications, which is missing. This is a big feature that is missing compared to the other products in the market. Additionally, the SDKs, Journey Player, and other components are not business-friendly, so you really have to be technical to get into it and do those things. A non-technical person would find it really hard to implement and learn things inside Transmit Security. Even though it requires less coding, you still have to have some technical people in your team to really write the rules and integrate those rules into your application.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Passwordless Authentication solutions are best for your needs.
884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
34%
Retailer
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Transmit Security?
Transmit interface is flexible and user-friendly, which is important for our workload. Switching from one authentication code to multiple exposure or two-factor authentication (MFA) is seamless.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Transmit Security?
I have heard that pricing, setup costs, and licensing for Transmit Security are a little bit expensive, but I am not in charge of the budget in my team, so I cannot answer that with complete certai...
What needs improvement with Transmit Security?
I think Transmit Security can be improved by creating features that would allow the replacing of other companies such as Onfido. For example, if it would allow you to sign in by taking a selfie and...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
BindID, FlexID, WorkID
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

First Citrus Bank, Fortune 100 Insurance, VHI Healthcare, Mastercard, CVS Health
Mitgate, Telepass, Metro Bank, Santander
Find out what your peers are saying about Portnox Security, Yubico, Keytos and others in Passwordless Authentication. Updated: March 2026.
884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.