We performed a comparison between HyperScience and UiPath Document Understanding based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Valuable features include tools like IQ Bot and the ability to extract handwritten documents with 93-95 per cent accuracy."
"What I liked more about HyperScience was the quality of the OCR it is a lot better compared to Google."
"It provides the best accuracy for handwritten forms, which is a struggle in the industry. You can take processes with a lot of manual work and streamline them through this tool."
"We have seen pretty good accuracy."
"One of the most valuable features of HyperScience is the user-training module. Whenever the extraction takes place, based on the way we have trained HyperScience, it would give us some success status or a certain confidence level. If the solution has processed something that it determined was not extracted correctly it will queue those items for manual review."
"I like that compared to other tools, HyperScience works best with handwritten documents."
"Has algorithms that can detect a document template even if the image has a lot of distortions."
"The solution is quite stable, and I am happy with its performance in my programs and processes."
"Machine learning is the most valuable feature of UiPath Document Understanding."
"We are working with 40,000 different vendor templates. Document Understanding can understand and process various formats without much manual effort to configure the templates. That wasn't the case when we were using Microsoft."
"UiPath provides a useful feature that allows us to classify documents as invoices or not."
"The highly visual and user-friendly interface was a standout feature."
"Has a very good machine learning feature."
"The best feature is pre-labeling, as it eliminates the need to manually label each data point."
"The machine learning (ML) extractor is valuable. It helps in extracting information from even unstructured documents. It can sometimes also extract information from a written document. Without much manual intervention, it is able to process the documents. This is a unique feature of UiPath Document Understanding."
"The solution lacks support for a greater range of languages."
"HyperScience has less capability while working on unstructured forms. Unstructured forms are those where there is no standard structure and the information can be anywhere on the form. They need to develop this capability."
"The product's usability could be better. The first pain point is that we're getting the output in a different format, and we were expecting a different timetable. The second point is that if you want better results, HyperScience says you have to configure a minimal PDF or a maximum of 400 PDFs. If you want results with 400 PDFs for what's written by these doctors, then you also configure the maximum of 400 templates for that. So, it's essentially a lack of support from HyperScience. In the next release, it would be better if failure scenarios were reduced. It would also help if they offered different formats, inputs or injections, and added different scenarios."
"They could work on the price and make it a bit more reasonable."
"HyperScience could improve the unstructured data extraction feature."
"No solution is perfect and there are several different scenarios that could be improved in HyperScience. One area is where there are multiple tables in the same form I have seen HyperScience struggle. There is some issue with supporting the extraction from multiple tables involved on the same form. If this could improve, it would be a big benefit."
"Extracting tables from certain documents could be improved."
"There is also room for improvement in long-running table extraction. If a table continues for more than 10 pages, in some cases, we have observed that it only extracts six or seven pages and skips the last pages."
"I would like to see more integration of artificial intelligence. That's being implemented, but it would be a massive improvement to the solution's document processing. If UiPath achieves intelligent document processing, it will be far better than anything on the market. There are currently some limitations with the fields that could be addressed using a GPT engine. With an integrated AI model, you wouldn't need to create your taxonomy. You would only need to provide some prompts, such as "What is the property name?" It will store that as a variable."
"At times, the scanning functionality of the tool may fail to generate accurate output, resulting in the need for manual input."
"UiPath Document Understanding requires more database connectors."
"UiPath Document Understanding can improve its handwriting and signature recognition."
"UiPath Document Understanding could be more user-friendly."
"There is still room for enhancement in capturing line items from invoices."
"They could work on the digitizing and classification of documents."
More UiPath Document Understanding Pricing and Cost Advice →
HyperScience is ranked 5th in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) with 7 reviews while UiPath Document Understanding is ranked 3rd in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) with 45 reviews. HyperScience is rated 7.6, while UiPath Document Understanding is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of HyperScience writes "It has a lot of functionality, whatever we use, but a few things could be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UiPath Document Understanding writes "Is easy to configure, user-friendly, and produces accurate results". HyperScience is most compared with ABBYY Vantage, UiPath, Instabase, Microsoft Power Automate and Automation Anywhere (AA), whereas UiPath Document Understanding is most compared with ABBYY Vantage, Instabase, Tungsten TotalAgility, Nanonets and Datamatics TruCap+. See our HyperScience vs. UiPath Document Understanding report.
See our list of best Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) vendors.
We monitor all Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.