We performed a comparison between Hyper-V, Oracle VM VirtualBox, and VMware vSphere based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Proxmox, VMware, Microsoft and others in Server Virtualization Software."There are some products that you can mount over Hyper-V that provide the features that, in today's Hyper-V, are not present."
"The virtual SAN feature is helpful."
"The organization has realized the benefits on smaller data center space, power, cooling, etc. apart from the benefit that the virtualization layer brings in."
"It runs our most critical workloads and supports all our branch offices."
"One of the most valuable features of Hyper-V is ease to use."
"It's a very manageable product."
"Microsoft has documentation that is easy to find, helpful, and readily available."
"It allows for quick deployment of servers and workloads."
"This product is very user-friendly and easy to use."
"It's a pretty good product in terms of monitoring."
"Technical support is good."
"It's very simple to use."
"Oracle VM VirtualBox has a platform where the support team responds to frequently asked questions by its users. Every time I have had issues with Oracle VM VirtualBox, I always get a solution from Oracle's online platform or GitHub."
"The solution is very stable."
"This solution can be used on many different platforms including Windows and Linux."
"I like that Oracle VM is safe and stable. It is also very easy to administer. For example, opening a VM or adding a host adapter is extremely easy."
"Server Virtualization is the most important feature because that helps me to utilize 100% capacity of my physical server or box. Its redundancy, uptime, or high-availability is also valuable. Storage-sharing is also valuable. In vSAN, I can utilize the maximum storage. In the physical boxes, if you don't require storage, it lies idle, but with VMware or any kind of virtualization, you can utilize the full storage."
"The virtualization, the remote management user interface, and the web console are most valuable."
"An easy way of providing near-zero downtime services, the operation of the instances between clustered services, and providing the projected SLA for our customers."
"The most useful features are ESXi, DRS, Auto Deploy, and the Lifecycle Manager."
"It's very transparent and independent."
"The initial setup is very simple."
"Valuable features really depend on different projects. We are using the traditional infrastructure based on VMware vSphere. We are also using the high availability (HA) and Distributed Switch features to extend our network and switch between different hosts. The VMotion and SVMotion features are very essential for us to relocate the storage of virtual machines to different storage or vSANs. We are using VMotion and SVMotion features several times of the day. We are also using another VMware product to replicate a lot of solutions to a second replication site."
"The provisioning setup of VMs is good."
"Hyper-V doesn't have a lot of features and is limited compared to other virtualization software."
"ometimes a server or machine shuts down and doesn't automatically restart."
"I think the console could use some improvement for the backups."
"Hyper-V systems need a lot of admin effort because security updates and monthly updates require rebooting after the update."
"The only issues we have had recently are with Windows updates that are built into the Windows server with Hyper-V."
"The biggest problem with Hyper-V is that the virtual machines are mostly running on top of the Windows Server, so we often need to reboot the machine and virtual machines when updating the host level. That's why we prefer VMware. It's much easier to patch the host. Also, Hyper-V has security vulnerabilities. It's easy to attack and compromise the host."
"The the only challenge for us was moving existing physical machines to virtual machines."
"Hyper-V needs to improve its support."
"They could improve the graphics functionality of the product."
"The installation is difficult and could be improved."
"Oracle VM VirtualBox is not flexible, It's not like VMware."
"There are a few bugs that need to be updated."
"The solution lacks some open source remote administration tools. The reload of individual virtual machine definitions through the vboxweb service (via its API) without restarting it and the access to shared storage (to use teleport functions) need to be improved."
"It's not as robust as server platforms, nor does it need to be."
"I think that this solution should be more user-friendly."
"Oracle VM VirtualBox doesn't work properly with an antivirus tool."
"I would like to start to using NSX in the next release."
"Its price should be better. Their support should also be more customer-friendly, and they should train people like us so that we know more about the latest technologies and features. If there is some program and drive from their side to teach us, it is definitely going to help us. Pricing and support are the most important features for mid-level companies. We are not implementing this solution for big tech companies."
"It could improve the hyper-conversions."
"It would be ideal if they could integrate billing software so that clients can customize it directly on the virtual machine."
"Without a lot of physical RAM on the hardware, it's not very effective. The stability could be improved in cases like this."
"I'd like to see a little bit more integration for VDI. I think that Composer servers, security servers, broker servers with connections, I'm not sure they are necessary at this point. Perhaps they could have a lot of those functions baked directly into the hypervisor. It seems to me that if the hypervisor is scalable and flexible enough, that the processor and compute can handle all of that. Maybe we eliminate those other components for VDIs and have more mixed workloads: server workloads and desktop workloads all in the same hypervisor."
"There are certain tools the can't run in parallel and occasionally, in those instances, we have trouble migrating customers from one source to our data center."
"It could be more scalable."