We performed a comparison between HPE NonStop and HPE Synergy based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Blade Servers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We don't have any issues with the stability of HPE NonStop."
"Feature-wise, the most valuable one is the fact that it has 100 hundred percent uptime every year. Secondly, it is stable."
"The stability of HPE NonStop is good."
"The manageability is its most valuable feature. It is a fully managed platform, which is very simple to manage."
"The solution is built very well. It's very robust and durable."
"We like that the solution can be arranged for an all-in-one single pane of glass, something our customers find important."
"Ability to easily re-utilize parts of the hardware for different purposes."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the ease of management and the integration with OneView."
"The flexibility to link them together and configure them gives us the ability to scale out easily, to add more compute resources as needed... The way that they're scalable and flexible means we can add additional servers in quickly... We're not spending a lot of time doing procurement and building of physical servers."
"This is above and beyond anything else any of the competitors have on the market. If you're researching this, you're going down the right path."
"The composable infrastructure allows us to build our own server profiles, then build up the infrastructure that we need from compute modules."
"It is not flexible...Not a lot of applications run on HPE NonStop."
"HPE NonStop could improve by having infrastructure management."
"It would be helpful if they brought the price down."
"Technical support for this solution has a very good initial response; however, escalation takes time, and most of the time the first level of support cannot solve your case."
"Product documentation is disorganized."
"The expansion was complex, because adding a second frame onto the original frame caused an outage."
"Changes to the solution are quite complex."
"In the past, I have had issues with configurations."
"We had an issue during the initial setup with the 40 Gigabyte cards. They weren’t working, so we had to work really closely with HPE support to get them to work."
"The solution must concentrate on improving the product quality."
"I would like to see more nodes in a single chassis so we wouldn't have to purchase additional chassis."
HPE NonStop is ranked 9th in Blade Servers with 12 reviews while HPE Synergy is ranked 1st in Blade Servers with 85 reviews. HPE NonStop is rated 8.8, while HPE Synergy is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of HPE NonStop writes "With a perfect record for uptime, the solution ensures a return on investment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE Synergy writes "Local hard drives are not needed for the i3S module that boots to any operating system". HPE NonStop is most compared with HPE Superdome X, Dell PowerEdge M, Fujitsu CX1000 and Oracle Sun 6000, whereas HPE Synergy is most compared with HPE BladeSystem, Dell PowerEdge M, Cisco UCS B-Series, HPE Apollo and HPE Superdome X. See our HPE NonStop vs. HPE Synergy report.
See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.
We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
