HPE Aruba Networking UXI vs LiveNX comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and BlueCat are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.5, while BlueCat is ranked #28 with an average rating of 9.0. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 0.6% mindshare in NMS, compared to BlueCat’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of BlueCat users who would recommend it.

HPE Aruba Networking UXI

Read 5 HPE Aruba Networking UXI reviews

3,340 Views
3,039 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

LiveNX

Read 10 LiveNX reviews

6,097 Views
4,451 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

HPE Aruba Networking UXI

LiveNX

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

LiveNX and HPE Aruba Networking UXI are competing products in the network management domain, focusing on improving network performance and visibility. Data suggest that HPE Aruba Networking UXI offers superior features that many find worth the additional cost.

Features: LiveNX excels in network visualization and diagnostics, providing detailed traffic analysis and end-to-end visibility, suitable for complex environments. It enables real-time network monitoring for immediate issue identification, provides visual analytics for better bandwidth allocation, and includes an alerting system for network anomalies. HPE Aruba Networking UXI stands out with its comprehensive performance monitoring and proactive alerting features, focusing on user experience improvement with real-time insights and detailed analytics. It integrates robustly with other tools, providing application visibility, and has AI-driven insights primarily for SD-WAN optimization.

Room for Improvement: LiveNX could enhance its feature set to offer more advanced user experience analytics and greater integration capabilities with third-party tools. Its network visualization, while strong, lacks some real-time data comparison with historical metrics offered by HPE Aruba Networking UXI. Further improvement could be made in its customization options. HPE Aruba Networking UXI could benefit from streamlining the configuration process to reduce complexity for new users. Prior enhancements include better API documentation and increased flexibility in alert configurations to cater to diverse operational requirements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LiveNX offers a straightforward deployment process with robust customer service that eases initial integration challenges. HPE Aruba Networking UXI provides a streamlined deployment experience with enhanced support and configuration options. Its deployment flexibility makes it adaptable to various infrastructure needs, providing a slight advantage over LiveNX in terms of ease and adaptability.

Pricing and ROI: LiveNX offers cost-effective solutions, making implementation affordable with quicker returns on investment due to competitive pricing and efficient customer support. In contrast, HPE Aruba Networking UXI requires a higher initial investment. However, its tailored insights and advanced features justify the price, offering potentially higher ROI over time for organizations prioritizing in-depth analytics and user experience enhancement.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE Aruba Networking UXI vs. LiveNX Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HPE Aruba Networking UXI vs. LiveNX

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE Aruba Networking UXI

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

21st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

4.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (8th)

LiveNX

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

28th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (34th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of HPE Aruba Networking UXI is 0.6%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LiveNX is 1.0%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HPE Aruba Networking UXI	0.6%
LiveNX	1.0%
Other	98.4%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Søren Overgaard Bendtsen

IT Director at CGL Pack Annecy S.A.S.

Monitoring has provided factual end‑to‑end insights and supports proactive incident response

From using HPE Aruba Networking UXI, I have access to real numbers for latency, packet drops, and other metrics. We also have a pretty intensive alerting mechanism that works on specific IPs for all our sites that are pinging, so if they are not reachable, we will have an alert and an incident created. I assess the value of HPE Aruba Networking UXI's application visibility in enhancing network performance as great. HPE Aruba Networking UXI's remote troubleshooting capabilities help me manage my distributed networks in a great way because we are not relying on user input. We are relying on real facts from HPE Aruba Networking UXI devices that are placed end-of-line on all our factories.

Read full review

Ashwani Bansal

Senior Solution Consultant at Orange

Network management and diagnostics improved through effective monitoring and reporting capabilities

The solution is handy. I have not used that particular feature. Maintenance is required for the system. If you want to use something on the endpoints or end-user devices, then using LiveAction LiveNX in place of other tools would be quite beneficial. The solution impacts operational costs and resources. On a scale of 1-10, I rate LiveAction LiveNX a nine.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"HPE Aruba Networking UXI's remote troubleshooting capabilities help me manage my distributed networks in a great way because we are not relying on user input and are relying on real facts from HPE Aruba Networking UXI devices that are placed end-of-line on all our factories."

"Aruba products have significantly improved our network reliability, as none of my teammates have logged a call to Aruba in the past year."

"The most valuable feature of HP Aruba Networking UX-I is its 24/7 monitoring capability."

"The integration of HPE Aruba Networking UXI with other security and networking tools is quite robust, allowing us to collect information from firewalls, routers, access points, and more, and present it through Grafana to proactively address issues before clients open support tickets."

"The performance, elasticity, and efficiency of Aruba products have been exceptional."

"There was definitely an ROI with the use cases I have had; when you see that the network issues and trouble tickets that are opening start to decrease, that is where your ROI starts coming in regarding productivity."

"On a scale of 1-10, I rate LiveAction LiveNX a nine."

"The intention and the idea of the filter is great, but it is far, far away from good and perfect."

"We provide a tool for our customers to manage their reports. It's an extremely highly featured platform capable of producing a lot of data. We spent quite a long time working with customers and LiveAction to create template reports, and they're very good and configurable. You get a lot of data if you don't configure them."

"One of the valuable features is the ability to create CLI scripts on the fly to fix any issues. We were using it for QoS modeling to ensure that we were properly modeling QoS, and it basically said here is what you need to fix to get this QoS done, whether it is ACL or something else. It would either push or recommend. If you have the right credentials, you could also push. It is very good if you are a Cisco shop. It gives you reporting, latency, and bandwidth utilization for your applications, so you can do good capacity management planning. There are a lot of pieces that LiveNX can give you. It is a total NPM solution for SD-WAN."

"All in all, LiveAction LiveNX has become an indispensable tool for maintaining and improving our network's reliability and performance, ultimately supporting our organization's goal of providing timely and dependable delivery services."

"There are many positive attributes, and it's the best of the best."

"If you're looking for a tool that will solve your problems in a short period of time more effectively, LiveNX is the right tool."

"It is very good if you are a Cisco shop; it gives you reporting, latency, and bandwidth utilization for your applications, so you can do good capacity management planning."

More LiveNX pros

Cons

"Some manual administrative tasks still need to be triggered manually, leading to lower efficiency."

"It would be beneficial if the tool offered a less expensive subscription as it is currently costly for our clients."

"They could improve their services."

"Areas where the HPE Aruba Networking UXI can improve include the integration of SD-WAN and security in a single solution."

"They have some unique functionality but they need to create a more simplified UI."

"The only downside to this software is the price."

"Improved documentation and more responsive customer support can help in addressing issues faster."

"My advice to others would be to run away from it. This is a slight exaggeration but this is more because the application is horrible, the stability is horrible, the performance is horrible and the support is horrible."

"It is not as robust as other NPM solutions."

"The product is weak in multi-tenancy. We have to install multiple instances of LiveAction, whereas we would like to build it once for our customers."

"It is not as robust as other NPM solutions. For instance, there is a problem while labeling specific applications. It works well with well-known applications, but when you have to put in new applications that are not very known and set them up with names, ports, URLs, or some protocols, it is not as intuitive."

"This is a horrible solution and I think everything needs to be improved."

More LiveNX cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"We use the free version."

"It's very expensive."

"The solution is fairly expensive compared to other products."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Insurance Company

24%

Healthcare Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE Aruba Networking UXI?

With the pricing and setup cost and licensing for the HPE Aruba Networking UXI, it depends and varies. Many people use these for a short-term solution just to gather their information. Many leverag...

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE Aruba Networking UXI?

I actually do not know if there is room for improvement for HPE Aruba Networking UXI because it is my networking team who handles that on a daily basis. They are using it and they are really fond o...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HPE Aruba Networking UXI?

The primary use case for HPE Aruba Networking UXI is to obtain fact-based data on what is actually occurring, rather than relying on fluffy user input. I work mostly with HPE Aruba Networking, spec...

See all answers

What needs improvement with LiveAction LiveNX?

The solution could be enhanced by implementing custom patterns for each customer.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for LiveAction LiveNX?

The customers use LiveAction LiveNX for network monitoring and management purposes.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering LiveAction LiveNX?

I work as an integrator with LiveAction LiveNX. Most customers prefer deploying it on premises rather than in the cloud. The advanced diagnostics capabilities, including flow-based surveillance and...

See all answers

Comparisons

ThousandEyes vs HPE Aruba Networking UXI

Compared 13% of the time

7SIGNAL Platform vs HPE Aruba Networking UXI

Compared 9% of the time

ThreatSync NDR vs HPE Aruba Networking UXI

Compared 7% of the time

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs HPE Aruba Networking UXI

Compared 7% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs HPE Aruba Networking UXI

Compared 5% of the time

More HPE Aruba Networking UXI Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs LiveNX

Compared 6% of the time

Nmap vs LiveNX

Compared 5% of the time

ThousandEyes vs LiveNX

Compared 4% of the time

LiveSP vs LiveNX

Compared 4% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs LiveNX

Compared 3% of the time

More LiveNX Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

September 2026

Download HPE Aruba Networking UXI product report

Buyer's Guide

LiveNX

September 2026

Download LiveNX product report

Also Known As

No data available

LiveNX

Overview

HPE Aruba Networking UXI provides proactive 24/7 monitoring for wireless and Ethernet networks, optimizing network performance and minimizing downtime. It's effective in complex environments like universities and enterprises.

HPE Aruba Networking UXI delivers comprehensive network visibility with advanced tools, offering real-time performance data to aid troubleshooting. LAN and SD-WAN services are enhanced with AI-driven insights for improved operational efficiency. It supports multi-tenant setups via Aruba Central, offering reliability with minimal administrative burden. However, its cost and manual administrative processes could be more efficient.

What are the key features of HPE Aruba Networking UXI?

Proactive Monitoring: 24/7 surveillance for wireless and Ethernet networks.
Real-Time Data: Provides immediate insights for quick resolution.
AI-Driven Insights: Focus on optimizing operations through machine learning.
Integration Capabilities: Coordination with tools like Zabbix for enhanced monitoring.
Multi-Tenant Support: Easy setup across multiple users via Aruba Central.

What benefits should be evaluated when considering HPE Aruba Networking UXI?

Improved Network Visibility: Enhanced insights lead to reduced downtime.
Operational Efficiency: AI-driven tools minimize administrative efforts.
User Experience: Optimizes end-user interactions with the network.
Cost Efficiency: Despite high subscription cost, offers robust features.

In healthcare, universities, and enterprise environments, users rely on HPE Aruba Networking UXI to enhance network performance. Automotive and car rental industries in Brazil integrate it with existing infrastructure like access points and switches to manage and monitor networks effectively, even with limited LAN resources.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

LiveNX enables real-time network monitoring with a graphical interface, offering detailed reports and advanced integration for comprehensive analysis and efficient network management.

LiveNX provides intuitive tools for real-time issue identification and resolution, leveraging advanced integration with platforms like Cisco SD-WAN to enhance network performance analysis. Through features such as visual analytics and QoS modeling, LiveNX supports capacity management planning and operational efficiency, although it requires improvements in pricing, resource efficiency, and web interface functionality. Users value its insights into traffic patterns, enabling optimization and proactive issue resolution.

What are the key features of LiveNX?

Real-Time Monitoring: Facilitates immediate issue identification.
Graphical Interface: Enhances user experience with detailed visualization.
Integration Capabilities: Supports platforms like Cisco SD-WAN for comprehensive analysis.
Visual Analytics: Provides insights into traffic patterns.
QoS Modeling: Aids in planning and maintaining service quality.
Custom Templates: Offers personalized network management tools.

What benefits should users look for?

Proactive Issue Resolution: Enables early detection and solving of network problems.
Comprehensive Analysis: Assists in understanding and managing network performance.
Operational Efficiency: Enhances overall network management processes.
Traffic Optimization: Improves service quality and network utilization.

Industries use LiveNX to monitor and troubleshoot network performance, manage traffic, and ensure QoS across on-premises and cloud environments. It is particularly valued for its ability to visualize and optimize network traffic, which is crucial for maintaining service quality.

BlueCat

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Tampa Electric, Digital First Media, Allscripts, Boxwood Technology

Buyer's Guide

HPE Aruba Networking UXI vs. LiveNX

September 2026

Free Report: HPE Aruba Networking UXI vs. LiveNX

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking UXI vs. LiveNX and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE Aruba Networking UXI vs. LiveNX report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.