IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

Hansoft vs Microsoft Project comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
monday Logo
3,314 views|2,359 comparisons
Perforce Logo
127 views|110 comparisons
Microsoft Logo
1,722 views|805 comparisons
Featured Review
Buyer's Guide
Project Management Software
May 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, monday, Planview and others in Project Management Software. Updated: May 2022.
597,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I wasn't involved with the licensing, but I believe it's negotiable."
  • "The solution is quite inexpensive. For example, we pay $8,500 for 75 users. It's somewhere around $100 a user, approximately."
  • "The project manager would be responsible for any licensing fees. As an end-user, we just follow suit."
  • "Fees are paid monthly per user."
  • "The price is reasonable for the number of users we have."
  • "I am using its free version."
  • "We tell others it's about $2200 for a ten-person plan and it can be adjusted; it's easy to scale."
  • More monday.com Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
  • "It gets expensive when having to add all of the plugins and everything that you need."
  • "It probably was $30 per license on a monthly basis. There is no additional fee."
  • "I do not remember the exact cost we paid but usually, they charge per user per month."
  • "Its price could be reduced a little."
  • "It was a three-year license deal that was reconciled on a quarterly basis. It is a reasonably priced product, and I consider that we got good value for money."
  • "Licensing costs vary depending on the user volume. The pricing is good, I'd rate it four out of five."
  • More Microsoft Project Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
    597,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: 
    The solution just makes it so much easier to keep track of where things are.
    Top Answer: 
    More customizations for automation would be useful. Sometimes, the built-in options are limiting and do not allow for… more »
    Top Answer: 
    I use Monday mostly for providing visibility on shared projects. Before, at my full-time job in event marketing and… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer: 
    It is a complete and all-rounded enterprise product. From a portfolio management perspective and an individual project… more »
    Top Answer: 
    It was a three-year license deal that was reconciled on a quarterly basis. It is a reasonably priced product, and I… more »
    Top Answer: 
    It is a traditional Waterfall-based solution, so it doesn't lend itself particularly well to Agile development. You can… more »
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    DaPulse
    Project Pro, MS Project
    Learn More
    Overview

    Perfectly scalable, fully customizable, and supported for thousands of users. From managing core processes to team management to project or task management, monday.com has got your back.

    Hansoft is the enterprise Agile project management app powering faster, smarter, leaner collaboration. So the whole team — artists, producers, developers, and executives — can advance together and build better products.

    Microsoft Project helps you get started quickly and execute projects with ease. Built-in templates and familiar scheduling tools help project managers and teams stay productive.

    Offer
    Learn more about monday.com
    Learn more about Hansoft
    Learn more about Microsoft Project
    Sample Customers
    Raw Digital, Wix, Discovery, Frost & Sullivan, Adidas, Asos, Uber
    Ericsson, EA, OHB, Schneider Electric
    Aston Martin, ABANCA, Airbus Group, Capita, Cardiff University, City of Saskatoon, Intel, Pegasus Airlines, South Australia Power Network (SAPN), Israeli Ministry of Construction and Housing
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Marketing Services Firm19%
    Non Tech Company8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Media Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider19%
    Computer Software Company18%
    Government7%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Retailer10%
    Transportation Company10%
    Healthcare Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider22%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Government9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business80%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business61%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise23%
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business44%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise44%
    Buyer's Guide
    Project Management Software
    May 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, monday, Planview and others in Project Management Software. Updated: May 2022.
    597,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Hansoft is ranked 40th in Project Management Software while Microsoft Project is ranked 4th in Project Management Software with 24 reviews. Hansoft is rated 0.0, while Microsoft Project is rated 7.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Project writes "Resource leveling is useful, but it is time and manpower intensive and not at all dynamic". Hansoft is most compared with Jira, whereas Microsoft Project is most compared with Smartsheet, Broadcom Clarity PPM, Jira, Wrike and Freshservice.

    See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.

    We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.