No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Gruntwork AWS Terraform Module Libraries & Reference Architecture vs Ubuntu 18.04 (Ubuntu 18.04 LTS) | Support by SupportedImages comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Gruntwork AWS Terraform Mod...
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
54th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Ubuntu 18.04 (Ubuntu 18.04 ...
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
512th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Manas Kashyap - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Dev Ops Engineer at 11 East Capital
Infrastructure as code has boosted multi-account deployments but needs less tool lock-in
The best features of Gruntwork AWS Terraform Module Libraries & Reference Architecture are that they offer production-grade option modules that are available for everything I can think of, such as VPC, EKS, RDS, ALB, NLB, or any Lambda functions, as well as the Terragrunt-first architecture, which emphasizes that DRY configs are there, remote states, and multiple account deployment can be used with that. It also maintains security best practices, including default IAM, least privileged right access, secure networking, logging, auditability, and CIS controlled network. Gruntwork AWS Terraform Module Libraries & Reference Architecture has positively impacted my organization, as previously things were done manually, but now we have everything in place. All the Terraform configurations are in the form of infrastructure as code that's available. I find Gruntwork AWS Terraform Module Libraries & Reference Architecture very good for easier management, as our whole infrastructure is there in the form of code. There are fewer chances of error because everything is in a formal structure, infrastructure as code, which can be reviewed by other people as well. The production speed and the deployment speed are quite high; if anything comes up, we don't need to go and check it. We can just write a module inside it, and it will create that thing using the other modules that are there.
reviewer2920476 - PeerSpot reviewer
Development Engineer at a media company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Containerization with automation has improved deployment speed and supports efficient DevOps work
One area for improvement would be longer security support and more frequent updates. Ubuntu 18.04 (Ubuntu 18.04 LTS) | Support by SupportedImages is stable, but as technology evolves, compatibility with newer versions of Docker, Kubernetes, and other DevOps tools can become a challenge. I would also want to see more lightweight and optimized official Docker images to reduce image size, improve build times, and minimize security vulnerabilities. Better documentation and smoother dependency management could also be more helpful. I would like Canonical to focus more on security updates, vulnerability scanning, and compatibility with modern DevOps tools. For example, smaller or more optimized Docker images would help reduce build time and improve container startup performance. It would also be helpful to have regular updates for commonly used packages and better compatibility with newer Docker and Kubernetes versions. Another important area is clear documentation for upgrading older Ubuntu versions to newer LTS releases without disrupting existing applications. These improvements would make Ubuntu 18.04 (Ubuntu 18.04 LTS) | Support by SupportedImages more secure, efficient, and easier to maintain in production. The main areas of improvement that kept my rating at eight instead of a nine or ten would be that there are some newer technologies and dependencies that might have compatibility issues with older packages. Additionally, security maintenance and upgrading to newer LTS versions require additional effort. Overall, it is a good platform, but there is room for improvement in modern tool compatibility, security, and container optimization. A small improvement would be better built-in monitoring and diagnostic tools, making it easier to identify performance issues, memory usage, and resource bottlenecks. It would also be helpful to have similar security patch management, clear upgrade notifications, and more detailed documentation for Docker and Kubernetes compatibility. These small improvements could significantly ease day-to-day system administration and reduce troubleshooting efforts.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AWS Marketplace solutions are best for your needs.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
27%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Outsourcing Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Gruntwork AWS Terraform Module Libraries & Reference Architecture?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that everything is very straightforward and easy to understand.
What needs improvement with Gruntwork AWS Terraform Module Libraries & Reference Architecture?
Gruntwork AWS Terraform Module Libraries & Reference Architecture can be improved in that the module update process is somewhat of a pain point. As modules evolve, upgrading existing environmen...
What is your primary use case for Gruntwork AWS Terraform Module Libraries & Reference Architecture?
The main use case for Gruntwork AWS Terraform Module Libraries & Reference Architecture is to standardize how our AWS infrastructure is provisioned using Terraform. As our engineering team star...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ubuntu 18.04 (Ubuntu 18.04 LTS) | Support by SupportedImages?
What I like about the product is the license cost and security, as there is no license cost for Ubuntu 18.04 (Ubuntu 18.04 LTS) | Support by SupportedImages.
What needs improvement with Ubuntu 18.04 (Ubuntu 18.04 LTS) | Support by SupportedImages?
Using open-source, Excel-based tools is not very user-friendly. The complexity comes from using full access Microsoft Excel. I believe that I have not found it very friendly to use Microsoft Excel....
What is your primary use case for Ubuntu 18.04 (Ubuntu 18.04 LTS) | Support by SupportedImages?
Our major use case for Ubuntu 18.04 (Ubuntu 18.04 LTS) | Support by SupportedImages is that our ERP is on Ubuntu 18.04 (Ubuntu 18.04 LTS) | Support by SupportedImages.
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Dice, Upbound, Tulip Interfaces and others in AWS Marketplace. Updated: October 2026.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.