No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Grafana vs Gremlin Reliability Management Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
5.4
Organizations using Grafana achieved up to 250% ROI, reduced costs, and improved monitoring and response times significantly.
Sentiment score
7.0
Gremlin's platform improved ROI by reducing costs and downtime, streamlining error identification, and enhancing availability with efficient Chaos Engineering.
I can say the estimated return on investment was one hundred fifty percent to two hundred fifty percent within the first year due to the reduced downtime and faster troubleshooting.
Devops Engineer at AIQOD
I identified over-provisioned servers and reduced my AWS monthly bill by 15%, which is a significant saving in terms of costs.
System engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
We are seeing a return on investment from using Gremlin Reliability Management Platform because we are getting less production issues by thirty percent, as I mentioned earlier, making it a great investment.
DEVOPS specialist at a media company with 10,001+ employees
We do not need to look at all the day's metrics on Grafana dashboards; we run our chaos experiments in a production environment to see how reliable our product or service is.
DevOps & Mlops Engineer at a printing company with 1-10 employees
If we needed ten people to do tests once upon a time, now, using Gremlin Reliability Management Platform, we can do it with a fifty percent reduction in employees.
Senior Software Engineer at a sports company with 10,001+ employees
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.2
Grafana's support receives mixed feedback, with praise for both its responsive technical team and effective community resources.
Sentiment score
8.0
Gremlin's customer support is highly rated for responsiveness and resources, with most users giving scores of eight to ten.
The technical support team is very helpful with complex PromQL troubleshooting.
System engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
My advice for people who are new to Grafana or considering it is to reach out to the community mainly, as that's the primary benefit of Grafana.
Sr. DevOps at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
The documentation is comprehensive, and the active community makes it easy to find solutions to common issues.
Devops Engineer at AIQOD
When I have questions or run into issues with Gremlin Reliability Management Platform, their support team is helpful and responsive.
DevOps & Mlops Engineer at a printing company with 1-10 employees
The expert partnership model is a significant strength I can suggest for Gremlin Reliability Management Platform.
VP Global at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
The customer support for Gremlin Reliability Management Platform is good overall.
DEVOPS specialist at a media company with 10,001+ employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
5.5
Grafana scales effectively with integrations, but some users find complexity and scaling costs challenging for extensive environments.
Sentiment score
7.8
Gremlin's platform ensures seamless scalability and efficient workload management, enhancing DevOps across diverse cloud environments with safety mechanisms.
It is highly scalable and built on a big data architecture capable of ingesting trillions of data points.
System engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
In terms of our company, the infrastructure is using two availability zones in AWS.
DevOps Team Lead at Kadabra
In assessing Grafana's scalability, we started noticing logs missing or metrics not syncing in time.
Sr. DevOps at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
Gremlin Reliability Management Platform scales smoothly for running more chaos experiments, adding more services, or supporting a larger team.
DevOps & Mlops Engineer at a printing company with 1-10 employees
Gremlin Reliability Management Platform's workload management capability is good, effectively managing large workloads seamlessly while providing safety mechanisms and governance around chaos engineering.
Documentation Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
More than scalability, I thought about availability because it is a really important thing of the architecture tools.
Dev Ops To Development (IT) at a non-tech company with self employed
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
Grafana is stable and reliable with minimal downtime, though resource optimization is key to maintaining performance and integration issues may occur.
Sentiment score
9.3
Gremlin Reliability Management Platform is praised for its stability and reliability, consistently delivering downtime-free and dependable performance.
Stable in the sense that we have experienced minimal downtime, and it performs reliably for day-to-day monitoring and dashboard visualization.
Devops Engineer at AIQOD
When something in their dashboard does not work, because it is open source, I am able to find all the relative combinations that people are having, making it much easier for me to fix.
DevOps Team Lead at Kadabra
Once you get to a higher load, you need to re-evaluate your architecture and put that into account.
Sr. DevOps at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
I have not seen any downtime or issues with its behavior or performance.
Senior Software Engineer at a sports company with 10,001+ employees
 

Room For Improvement

Grafana's usability suffers from complex UI, limited reporting, and integration challenges; enhancements in security, AI, and flexibility are needed.
Gremlin could improve through AI-driven analysis, better user onboarding, expanded service integrations, enhanced UI, and additional learning resources.
It would be better if they made the technology easy to use without needing to read extensive documentation.
AWS Cloud Re-Start Program Specialist at Orange RDC (Congo)
Grafana cannot be easily embedded into certain applications and offers limited customization options for graphs.
BI and Analytics Engineer at Sandvine Inc
I would want to see improvements, especially in the tracing part, where following different requests between different services could be more powerful.
Director of Engineering at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
I think it would be useful to have some integration with Splunk or other log collectors, or maybe in the future, the ability to link Dynatrace or any other observability platform.
Dev Ops To Development (IT) at a non-tech company with self employed
If we can integrate it with natural language, could we talk to Gremlin Reliability Management Platform and have it configure some of the basic settings so that non-technical persons can also work on Gremlin Reliability Management Platform-like tools?
DEVOPS specialist at a media company with 10,001+ employees
The user interface is great, the integration is smooth, and Gremlin Reliability Management Platform has a fantastic support team that helps us a lot in many cases.
DevOps & Mlops Engineer at a printing company with 1-10 employees
 

Setup Cost

Grafana's open-source is cost-effective, but enterprise edition pricing varies by usage and infrastructure, with cloud options available.
Enterprise users value Gremlin's platform for reliability and risk management, justifying costs despite visibility challenges in dashboards.
There were no licensing costs.
Devops Engineer at AIQOD
In an enterprise setting, pricing is reasonable, as many customers use it.
Aplication Architect at Amazon
The costs associated with using Grafana are somewhere in the ten thousands because we are able to control the logs in a more efficient way to reduce it.
DevOps Team Lead at Kadabra
It is not so cheap, but it has very powerful features.
Dev Ops To Development (IT) at a non-tech company with self employed
From a pricing standpoint of view regarding Gremlin Reliability Management Platform, I would say it is a bit expensive, but that expense is worth it given the kind of benefits it offers.
VP Global at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
My role does not incur costs for us since we have an NFR for Gremlin Reliability Management Platform that we can use in our case.
DevOps & Mlops Engineer at a printing company with 1-10 employees
 

Valuable Features

Grafana offers user-friendly dashboards, customizable visualizations, seamless integrations, effective alerts, scalability, and community support for enhanced monitoring.
Gremlin enhances efficiency with test suites, fault injection, risk detection, and reliability insights, boosting uptime and customer satisfaction.
Users can monitor metrics with greater ease, and the tool aids in quickly identifying issues by providing a visual representation of data.
Aplication Architect at Amazon
The fact that I can join data from my SQL database with metrics from Prometheus in the same table is a feature I have not found performed as well elsewhere.
System engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
You can check those metrics in the incident management tool by filtering the alert source as Grafana, and it helps in reducing production incidents because you can acknowledge and visualize the metrics from Grafana on time.
Senior Site Reliability Engineer at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees
There are really two pathways along: fewer incidents because with Gremlin Reliability Management Platform, we can make every part of the infrastructure more solid, and less downtime because we can test more architectures and then things like how to put in high availability clusters.
Dev Ops To Development (IT) at a non-tech company with self employed
We fix failures even before they occur, which is basically proactive risk detection and risk mitigation.
VP Global at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Gremlin Reliability Management Platform has positively impacted our organization by making outages less frequent and improving recovery time significantly, resulting in fewer complaints on the customer success side and overall optimization of our DevOps process.
Documentation Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Categories and Ranking

Grafana
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
7th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
50
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Gremlin Reliability Managem...
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
27th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
IT Infrastructure Monitoring (23rd), DevSecOps (10th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Grafana is 2.6%, down from 6.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Gremlin Reliability Management Platform is 0.2%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Grafana2.6%
Gremlin Reliability Management Platform0.2%
Other97.2%
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

Vitthal Gole - PeerSpot reviewer
Devops Engineer at AIQOD
Proactive monitoring has transformed how our teams detect issues and resolve incidents faster
For improving Grafana, the alert configuration could be more intuitive for new users. Dashboard management becomes complex in large environments. So if we have multiple environments and we have to manage our dashboards for them, sometimes it becomes complicated to manage all the dashboards. The learning curve is steep for beginners. More built-in reporting and analytics features would be helpful. Documentation for advanced features could be more detailed. Role-based access management could be simpler to configure. Performance could be optimized for very large dashboards with high cardinality data sources. Grafana could improve its alert configuration workflow and make advanced dashboard management easier for new users. More built-in reporting features would also be beneficial. A simpler onboarding experience for first-time users and more built-in dashboard templates for common monitoring scenarios would be helpful. Grafana is a powerful monitoring platform, but it could improve dashboard organization in large environments, simplify alert management, provide more built-in reporting capabilities, enhance plugin compatibility during upgrades, and offer better AI-driven insights for fast root cause analysis. For example, if we are hitting a CPU metric of ninety to ninety-five percent or a system load of seventy to eighty percent, we have to act on that. But if Grafana suggests something on that metric, such as an AI suggestion, it would be more helpful. We could get an idea of how to solve that issue. For the Grafana dashboards, they could provide more built-in compliance and audit reporting, enhance AI recommendations with clearer explanations of why an issue was flagged, enhance accessibility and keyboard navigation, add more native integrations with emerging cloud and DevOps tools, and improve scalability for very large enterprise deployments. Grafana is a mature platform, but it could benefit from better dashboard version control, simpler environment migration, enhanced AI explanations, more built-in reporting, and improved performance for large-scale deployments with complex dashboards.
Ravi Konduru - PeerSpot reviewer
VP Global at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Proactive failure testing has increased confidence and reliability across complex microservices
There are certain areas where I think Gremlin Reliability Management Platform can improve. I would certainly add features related to AI and GenAI for recommendations. While dependency identification works well seamlessly, deeper dependency intelligence is lacking. When you have deeper dependencies, reliability management can struggle with identifying those deeper dependency intelligences. Having the intelligence to deeply analyze dependencies will be very helpful. Regarding reliability scores, while those scores are good, having more actionable reliability scores is something I would recommend adding to the existing system. Initially, when I started with Gremlin Reliability Management Platform certification programs, I completed two certifications with Gremlin—one professional and another practitioner. While that certification has helped me, an easier onboarding and learning curve for bringing people into this program can be adjusted. That is one current gap I see. If you really look at the cost-benefit visibility, it is not very evident by using Gremlin Reliability Management Platform. If Gremlin Reliability Management Platform could help realize that and bring in visibility regarding the cost versus the benefit, that is the reason I provide a score less than ten. From a standpoint of simulating complex real-world failures, I believe there is still a gap concerning gap identification. Currently, Gremlin Reliability Management Platform mainly focuses on infrastructure-level failures and does not really simulate business logic failures, data corruption scenarios, or potential failures across regions. One of the key elements needing improvement with Gremlin Reliability Management Platform is the limited team workflow integration I see in my organization. Collaboration and limited team workflow integration are areas I would highlight as needing improvement.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
909,948 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Construction Company
12%
Printing Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Sports Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business14
Midsize Enterprise10
Large Enterprise27
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Large Enterprise7
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Grafana?
We are using the community edition. We have used the community edition, the open-source edition. So, there were no licensing costs. The setup was straightforward, and the main investment was the ti...
What needs improvement with Grafana?
For improving Grafana, the alert configuration could be more intuitive for new users. Dashboard management becomes complex in large environments. So if we have multiple environments and we have to ...
What is your primary use case for Grafana?
The main use case for Grafana is that we are using Prometheus to collect the metrics, and primarily use Grafana for infrastructure and application monitoring. It helps me visualize system metrics t...
What needs improvement with Gremlin Reliability Management Platform?
While I have no complaints about Gremlin Reliability Management Platform, I believe the UI can be improved to enhance the developer experience for security engineers and DevOps engineers. Additiona...
What is your primary use case for Gremlin Reliability Management Platform?
My main use case for Gremlin Reliability Management Platform is to see how our applications behave under extreme stress and how resilient our application is when a simulation of server crash alongs...
What advice do you have for others considering Gremlin Reliability Management Platform?
For others considering Gremlin Reliability Management Platform, it is an excellent tool for organizations facing downtime issues, as it allows for chaos testing without needing to check logs and me...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Microsoft, Adobe, Optum, Sky, Nvidia, Roblox, Wells Fargo, BlackRock, Informatica, Maersk, Daimler Truck, SNCF, Atlassian, DHL, SAP, JPMorgan Chase, Cisco, Citi and many others.
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Grafana vs. Gremlin Reliability Management Platform and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
909,948 professionals have used our research since 2012.