We performed a comparison between Google Cloud and IBM Cloud Private based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two PaaS Clouds solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Google Cloud is easy to use and accessible anywhere."
"Google Cloud performs well."
"It didn't take long to get everything set up and understand what was going on. Things are pretty clear."
"The solution is user-friendly and easy to spin."
"The most valuable feature of Google Cloud is its security."
"The availability of content on the solution is very valuable."
"The infrastructure is easy to manage."
"It's easy to deploy next-generation applications on Google Cloud. Customers can also use various cloud tools to optimize their operations and generate more insights to do business much smarter."
"The most valuable attribute is the platform's ability to consistently deliver high reliability."
"We have control of the ESXi."
"Excellent technical support."
"The product's framework is good, it integrates well with API Connect, and the private cloud allows for use in any location."
"Our core banking process was monolithic. To address this, we transitioned to a microservices-based architecture. Leveraging Microsoft technologies, including Terminals version 23, we’ve revamped our banking operations. Not all services are microservices; some remain monolithic for simplicity. Containerization is pivotal, with OpenShift (based on Kubernetes and Docker) managing our microservices."
"Integration is always something that can be improved."
"The privacy could be improved so that it is more secure."
"Google Cloud could improve the integration with other solutions."
"An area of improvement would be in the of managing accounts in terms of what we are using for memory, availability, and monitoring."
"The solution could improve by being less expensive."
"The documentation could be better."
"The solution could be cheaper."
"We'd like the storage to be increased."
"One issue with the solution is latency because there is lag time when we connect."
"I've noticed that the satellite services layer requires some improvement compared to platforms like Azure or Microsoft. While it's in development, I believe the satellite layer has room for enhancement. Additionally, the DevOps layer could benefit from closer integrations, especially for using external applications like Jenkins."
"The support and pricing need to improve."
"lacking in multi-cloud management."
"Auto-scaling and managing pod scaling in the microservices architecture, a core feature of IBM Cloud Private, can pose challenges, especially when dealing with larger volumes of traffic."
Google Cloud is ranked 5th in PaaS Clouds with 66 reviews while IBM Cloud Private is ranked 18th in PaaS Clouds with 5 reviews. Google Cloud is rated 8.2, while IBM Cloud Private is rated 6.8. The top reviewer of Google Cloud writes "Great for big data with off-the-charts scalability for storage and databases". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Cloud Private writes "Reliable platform with significant challenges related to performance capabilities when subjected to high traffic loads". Google Cloud is most compared with Alibaba Cloud, Linode, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), Pivotal Cloud Foundry and OpenShift, whereas IBM Cloud Private is most compared with OpenShift, Amazon AWS, Google App Engine and Pivotal Cloud Foundry. See our Google Cloud vs. IBM Cloud Private report.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.
We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.