Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Google Cloud AI Platform vs IBM Watson Studio comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 4, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud AI Platform
Ranking in AI Development Platforms
8th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM Watson Studio
Ranking in AI Development Platforms
10th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Data Science Platforms (12th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the AI Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Google Cloud AI Platform is 3.9%, down from 6.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Watson Studio is 1.6%, down from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AI Development Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

HaiPham - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps with text extraction from images and has a straightforward setup process
We use Google Cloud AI Platform to extract text from images, such as forms.  The platform's Google Vision API is particularly valuable. It helps with text extraction from images.  Improvements in text extraction accuracy and pricing adjustments would be helpful. The solution is stable.  We have…
Abilio Duarte - PeerSpot reviewer
A highly robust and well-documented platform that simplifies the complex world of AI
The main challenge lies in visibility and ease of use. Providing training sessions can be immensely helpful in helping users navigate and understand the tool's potential. This approach would empower users to explore and make the most of the tools and technologies at their disposal. Another area where IBM could enhance its offering is by providing more visibility to end users regarding the vast potential that Watson offers.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I have seen measurable benefits from Google Cloud AI Platform."
"A range of a a wide range of algorithms, EIM voice mails, which can be plugged in right away into your solution into into into our solution, and then have platform that provides know, to to come up with an operational solution really quick."
"On GCP, we are exposing our API services to our clients so that they send us their information. It can be single individual records or it can be a batch of their clients."
"The solution is able to read 90% of the documents correctly with a 10% error rate."
"The platform's Google Vision API is particularly valuable."
"I think the user interface is quite handy, and it is easy to use as compared to the other cloud platforms."
"The initial setup is very straightforward."
"Since the model could be trained in just a couple of hours and deploying it took only a few minutes, the entire process took less than an hour."
"Watson Studio is the most complete tool for AI projects."
"Stability-wise, it is a great tool."
"It has greatly improved the performance because it is standardized across the company."
"IBM Watson Studio consistently automates across channels."
"It stands out for its substantial AI capabilities, offering a broad spectrum of features for crafting solutions that meet specific requirements."
"The main benefit is the ease of use. We see a lot of engineers in our site and customers that really like the way the tools are able to work with the people."
"Technical support is great. We have had weekly teleconferences with the technical people at IBM, and they have been fantastic."
"In my experience, AutoML is the most valuable feature of IBM Watson Studio."
 

Cons

"The initial setup was straightforward for me but could be difficult for others."
"Customizations are very difficult, and they take time."
"It could be more clear, and sometimes there are errors that I don't quite understand."
"The solution can be improved by simplifying the process to make your own models."
"At first, there were only the user-managed rules to identify the best attributes of the individual. Then, we came up with a truth set and developed different machine learning models with the help of that truth set, so now it's completely machine learning."
"The technical support from Google is not very fast. I think it is about a five out of ten even though they have courses online where I can learn a lot, if I really need support, I have to wait a very long time."
"The model management on Google Cloud AI Platform could be better."
"Improvements in text extraction accuracy and pricing adjustments would be helpful."
"Initially, it was quite complex. For us, it was not only a matter of getting it installed, that was just a start. It was also trying to come up with a standard way of implementing it across the entire organization, which had been a challenge."
"We would like to see it more web-based with more functionality."
"The initial setup was complex."
"Some of the solutions are really good solutions but they can be a little too costly for many."
"So a better user interface could be very helpful"
"I think maybe the support is an area where it lacks."
"The solution's interface is very slow at times."
"I want IBM's technical support team to provide more specific answers to queries."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is on the expensive side."
"The solution has an attractive starting program, which costs only 300 USD for a duration of three months. During this period, one can accomplish a lot of work on the solution."
"The price of the solution is competitive."
"The licenses are cheap."
"For every thousand uses, it is about four and a half euros."
"IBM Watson Studio is a reasonably priced product"
"The pricing is generally reasonable and straightforward but can vary significantly depending on the specific workloads in use."
"IBM Watson Studio is an expensive solution."
"Watson Studio's pricing is reasonable for what you get."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
University
7%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Educational Organization
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Google Cloud AI Platform?
A range of a a wide range of algorithms, EIM voice mails, which can be plugged in right away into your solution into into into our solution, and then have platform that provides know, to to come up...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud AI Platform?
For the most part, the pricing is perfect sinceit grows with the use of my app. In some cases, they could be more specific about the pricing, especially for some AI features.
What is your primary use case for Google Cloud AI Platform?
I use Google Cloud AI Platform due to Firebase and the many APIs that are available with it.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Watson Studio?
IBM Watson Studio is considered rather expensive, with a rating of six or seven. The pricing could be optimized relative to the features and capabilities of the product.
What needs improvement with IBM Watson Studio?
IBM Watson Studio, while powerful, lacks user-friendliness. It is not easy to use, particularly for medium or small enterprises or less experienced staff. Another aspect that requires improvement i...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Watson Studio, IBM Data Science Experience, Data Science Experience, DSx
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Carousell
GroupM, Accenture, Fifth Third Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud AI Platform vs. IBM Watson Studio and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.