Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Azure OpenAI vs IBM Watson Studio comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 4, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.6
Azure OpenAI boosts productivity, reduces costs, accelerates project delivery, and improves efficiency without significant infrastructure investment.
Sentiment score
7.0
Organizations saw positive ROI from IBM Watson Studio due to improved efficiency, scalability, sales, and reduced staffing needs.
The product offers a significant return on investment through its scalability and integration capabilities.
My customers have seen returns on investment through increased efficiency, automated calculations, improved accuracy in pricing, and reduced staffing needs due to the automation.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.9
Azure OpenAI's customer service is helpful but inconsistent, with slow responses and challenges accessing expertise during high demand.
Sentiment score
7.2
IBM Watson Studio customer service is praised for efficiency and responsiveness, though support quality varies by subscription plan and community resources.
Tickets can be prioritized for critical issues.
It is important for organizations like Microsoft to apply OpenAI solutions within their own structures.
The support quality depends on the SLA or the contract terms.
The community access is weak, which limits the ability to engage in discussions and find documentation and examples of similar cases effectively.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.7
Azure OpenAI's scaling is seen as adaptable yet challenged by capacity, costs, and configuration, with improvements noted in newer releases.
Sentiment score
7.5
IBM Watson Studio is scalable with excellent integration, but its resource intensity may increase costs for extensive scaling.
The API works fine, allowing me to scale indefinitely.
The scalability depends on whether the application is multimodal or uses a single model.
Watson Studio is very scalable.
I rate IBM Watson Studio seven out of ten for scalability because while it scales, it requires significant resources to do so, making it expensive compared to some competitors.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Azure OpenAI generally receives high stability ratings, despite occasional performance issues, with room for improvement in integration.
Sentiment score
7.4
IBM Watson Studio is praised for stability and reliability, comparable to or better than competitors, with effective optimization for large tasks.
The solution works fine, particularly for enterprises or even some small enterprises.
Expertise in optimization is necessary to manage such issues effectively.
 

Room For Improvement

Azure OpenAI needs updates in data management, security, user support, and regional availability to improve adoption and efficiency.
IBM Watson Studio needs a more intuitive interface, better support, and reduced setup complexity for wider adoption.
Expanding token limitations for scaling while ensuring concurrent user access is crucial.
Azure needs to work on its own model development and improve the integration of voice-to-text services.
IBM should work on optimizing the user interface and enhancing the product's accessibility for medium and small enterprises.
One area that could be improved is the backup and restoration of the database and the overall database configuration.
 

Setup Cost

Azure OpenAI pricing is flexible but costly; enterprise agreements and financial controls can help manage expenses effectively.
IBM Watson Studio's pricing varies, offering a free light edition, yet considered expensive by some, especially in Africa.
Recent iterations have increased token allowances, mitigating some challenges associated with concurrent user access at scale.
The pricing is very good for handling various kinds of jobs.
IBM Watson Studio is considered rather expensive, with a rating of six or seven.
 

Valuable Features

Azure OpenAI offers advanced features like GPT-3.5, integration, scalability, security, and ease, enhancing operations with predictive analytics.
IBM Watson Studio excels in automation, predictive analytics, and integration, offering comprehensive AI capabilities for diverse data-driven tasks.
OpenAI models help me create predictive analysis products and chat applications, enabling me to automate tasks and reduce the workforce needed for repetitive work, thereby streamlining operations.
This capability saves a significant amount of time by automating processes that typically involve manual work, such as data cleaning, feature engineering, and predictive analytics.
It integrates well with other platforms and offers good scalability.
 

Categories and Ranking

Azure OpenAI
Ranking in AI Development Platforms
1st
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
33
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM Watson Studio
Ranking in AI Development Platforms
10th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Data Science Platforms (12th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the AI Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Azure OpenAI is 11.6%, down from 20.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Watson Studio is 1.6%, down from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AI Development Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

Viswanath Barenkala - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers tools to moderate generated content and guidance to safely design applications, but it is not consistently accessible
Instead of a feature, the GPT-4 model has been most beneficial for automating tasks. We transitioned from GPT-3.5 to GPT-4 and actively use it. However, we face limitations due to geographic availability, subscription constraints, and rate limiting, which we are currently negotiating and working towards optimizing. While we haven't formally benchmarked Azure OpenAI's language understanding against industry standards, we find it performs well about 70-80% of the time. Occasionally, we need to refine our queries and adapt our systems accordingly to improve accuracy and effectiveness.
Abilio Duarte - PeerSpot reviewer
A highly robust and well-documented platform that simplifies the complex world of AI
The main challenge lies in visibility and ease of use. Providing training sessions can be immensely helpful in helping users navigate and understand the tool's potential. This approach would empower users to explore and make the most of the tools and technologies at their disposal. Another area where IBM could enhance its offering is by providing more visibility to end users regarding the vast potential that Watson offers.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Educational Organization
5%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Educational Organization
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Azure OpenAI?
The product is easy to integrate with our IT workflow.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure OpenAI?
In the past, the primary expense involved token limitations which constrained scaling. Recent iterations have increased token allowances, mitigating some challenges associated with concurrent user ...
What needs improvement with Azure OpenAI?
Azure ( /products/microsoft-azure-reviews ) could significantly benefit from including more LLM models apart from OpenAI, as I often need to switch clouds when a model doesn't meet my requirements....
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Watson Studio?
IBM Watson Studio is considered rather expensive, with a rating of six or seven. The pricing could be optimized relative to the features and capabilities of the product.
What needs improvement with IBM Watson Studio?
IBM Watson Studio, while powerful, lacks user-friendliness. It is not easy to use, particularly for medium or small enterprises or less experienced staff. Another aspect that requires improvement i...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Watson Studio, IBM Data Science Experience, Data Science Experience, DSx
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
GroupM, Accenture, Fifth Third Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure OpenAI vs. IBM Watson Studio and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.