Google Chrome Enterprise vs openSUSE Leap comparison

Google and openSUSE are both solutions in the Operating Systems (OS) for Business category. Google is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.6, while openSUSE is ranked #12 with an average rating of 9.0. Google holds a 0.3% mindshare in OSB, compared to openSUSE’s 6.3% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of openSUSE users who would recommend it.

Google Chrome Enterprise

Read 21 Google Chrome Enterprise reviews

2,323 Views
348 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

openSUSE Leap

Read 6 openSUSE Leap reviews

5,740 Views
5,740 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Google Chrome Enterprise

openSUSE Leap

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 7, 2024

openSUSE Leap and Google Chrome Enterprise cater to different user needs in terms of their environments and purposes. While both products have unique advantages, Google Chrome Enterprise stands out in several areas such as security and usability, making it more favorable for enterprise solutions.

Features: openSUSE Leap offers essential features including system customization, comprehensive software management, and a flexible support model. Google Chrome Enterprise is valued for its security features, seamless integration with Google's ecosystem, and the extensive enterprise-focused tools it provides.

Room for Improvement: openSUSE Leap could improve in hardware compatibility, more efficient updates, and user interface design. Google Chrome Enterprise might enhance its offline functionalities, provide greater customization options, and streamline the management interface for admins.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: openSUSE Leap is known for easy deployment and robust community support. Google Chrome Enterprise is recognized for rapid deployment processes and dedicated customer service, offering a more specialized support advantage compared to openSUSE Leap's community-based assistance.

Pricing and ROI: openSUSE Leap is a cost-effective option with a favorable ROI due to its budget-friendly setup. Google Chrome Enterprise, although having a higher initial setup cost, justifies this through a rich feature set and better long-term ROI, making the investment valuable for enterprises.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Chrome Enterprise vs. openSUSE Leap Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Google Chrome Enterprise vs. openSUSE Leap

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google Chrome Enterprise

Ranking in Operating Systems (OS) for Business

13th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Browsers (1st)

openSUSE Leap

Ranking in Operating Systems (OS) for Business

12th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Operating Systems (OS) for Business category, the mindshare of Google Chrome Enterprise is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of openSUSE Leap is 6.3%, up from 5.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Operating Systems (OS) for Business

Featured Reviews

Sonu Thomas

Operations Manager at Cognitive Global

Adapting to changes is smooth with flexible storage options and responsive support

I can't use Google Chrome Enterprise for my bank site because it could be the bank site issue. Something is breaking on the logging page itself, so it could be a cookies issue. As long as it is working in Edge, I am content with that. Google account storage could use some improvements. They should have a better compression mechanism or increase the free data space to the next level; at least make it 30 or 40 GB. According to the current trend, increasing the free version is better so that people can sustain for some time before making a purchase. There could be more flexible options for pricing and license for Google Chrome Enterprise. Currently, there are maybe two, three, or four options, but there should be something lesser than one TB. Customers should be able to choose extra storage according to their needs, such as 50 GB on demand, rather than predefined sizes. There aren't many complaints about the Google Admin console; maybe some improvements, especially with the parent control part. Perhaps I didn't explore that much; that could be a reason.

Read full review

Nagendra Kavadi

Senior Manager at Cognizant

Provides BTRFS file system, which allows you to take snapshots

I only use the tool for testing purposes on my team, but multiple people use it. We don't make a team effort to install the solution. When it comes to maintenance, we ask our company to buy SUSE Linux Enterprise. My team consists of 13 people. We are currently integrating the solution with Ansible to do some coding. Although not a full-fledged automation, we are integrating the solution with Ansible and executing a couple of playbooks connected to openSUSE Leap. I would recommend the solution to other users looking for an open-source solution. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"Bookmarking is very good because they are synchronized across all devices."

"This solution is user-friendly with security features detecting if there is suspicious activity on the browser. There is a lot of extensions we can use to provide us with good coverage."

"The solution's most valuable feature is its browser, which offers good performance."

"It has been working pretty well for us...By and large, things are pretty stable."

"Chrome Enterprise is really easy to deploy and manage."

"The solution is easy to use."

"Google Chrome Enterprise provides ease of management for users and regular updates."

More Google Chrome Enterprise pros

"The most valuable feature by far has been the virtualization capabilities of the operating system."

"The solution is very stable after it is configured. It is hard to have a panel slow, a problem, misconfiguration, or any kind of loss function."

"openSUSE Leap has helped me with using containers in Podman."

"The solution's most valuable feature is the BTRFS file system, which allows you to take snapshots."

"Stable - it just runs without the necessity to reboot."

"The solution is easy for me to use because the backend is derived from FreeBSD and this is something I have been using for over 20 years."

Cons

"Identifying areas for improvement can be challenging since Chrome consistently strives to enhance itself. One aspect I'd like to highlight is virtualization. For instance, if you require desktop-based applications like Cisco or Adobe products on your local machine, Chrome's support is limited. While they offer Linux solutions for virtualization, my query or request would be to expand this to include Windows-based applications. If this were implemented, it would be a valuable enhancement, encouraging broader adoption by companies."

"You still need to have a pretty good understanding of GCP to deploy it properly."

"I wish there was a way that they could update things a little less often if anything. I think a lot of enterprise customers are frustrated... Certain plug-ins like ad blockers will lose some functionality in the next quarter to half a year."

"Google Chrome Enterprise doesn't use AI in its solution."

"In an upcoming release, the enhanced troubleshooting feature needs to improve to be able to identify the issues for the use case and for the user experience."

"The solution's interface is an area with certain shortcomings that need improvement."

"Chromebooks are hard to find in the Indonesian market."

"Whenever I'm using the bank that is not properly working on Chrome Enterprise, I switch to Edge."

More Google Chrome Enterprise cons

"Like most Linux-based operating systems, the biggest challenge Leap faces is the GUI."

"I would like openSUSE Leap to have better link integration with Windows."

"It would be helpful if we could easily switch from openSUSE Leap for testing to SUSE Linux Enterprise for production."

"Somehow the change from OS12.x via 13.x to Leap was a bit bumpy and some old issues seemed to reappear."

"In the future, the Active Directory could improve."

"There is room for improvement in the console."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product price is very good in my opinion."

"Yearly payments are to be made towards the licensing costs of Google Chrome Enterprise. It is not an expensive solution. I rate the solution's pricing model a six out of ten. There is a need to pay an extra cost in addition to the solution's standard licensing fees."

"So all I can say is just for us since we just recently re-upped our three-year contract for Google Education Enterprise, whatever the name is for their highest level enterprise...I found the pricing to be pretty reasonable overall."

"Google Chrome Enterprise is a medium-priced solution."

"We are on a monthly subscription for this solution."

"Pricing varies significantly based on different regions and specific requirements. The cost can differ for the Euro price as opposed to the Asia-specific price. Generally, the standard pricing falls within the range of twenty-five to thirty dollars per license. This payment can be structured on a monthly or yearly basis. Opting for the yearly payment plan often comes with an added discount, either directly from Google or through negotiations with your vendor."

"The cost of this solution was reasonable and it was within our budget."

"openSUSE Leap is an open-source solution that is free of cost."

"The solution is open-source."

"This is an open-source operating system that can be used free of charge."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Operating Systems (OS) for Business solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Comms Service Provider

17%

Computer Software Company

15%

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Google Chrome Enterprise?

The solution's most valuable feature is its browser, which offers good performance.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Chrome Enterprise?

I haven't paid for any services related to Google Chrome Enterprise.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Chrome Enterprise?

See all answers

What needs improvement with openSUSE Leap?

Both openSUSE Leap and the SUSE Enterprise version use the same kernel. Suppose I have a lower environment where I can run openSUSE to test all my products. It would be helpful if I could easily sw...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for openSUSE Leap?

I use openSUSE Leap for testing purposes. Before officially using any server in our office, we test it using the solution. My office usually uses production servers on the SUSE Linux enterprise ver...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for openSUSE Leap?

openSUSE Leap is an open-source solution that is free of cost.

See all answers

Comparisons

Island vs Google Chrome Enterprise

Compared 51% of the time

Avira Secure Browser vs Google Chrome Enterprise

Compared 13% of the time

Prisma Access Browser vs Google Chrome Enterprise

Compared 12% of the time

Windows Server vs Google Chrome Enterprise

Compared 5% of the time

Windows 10 vs Google Chrome Enterprise

Compared 4% of the time

More Google Chrome Enterprise Competitors

SUSE Linux Enterprise vs openSUSE Leap

Compared 26% of the time

Ubuntu Linux vs openSUSE Leap

Compared 20% of the time

Rocky Linux vs openSUSE Leap

Compared 16% of the time

Fedora Linux vs openSUSE Leap

Compared 10% of the time

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) vs openSUSE Leap

Compared 6% of the time

More openSUSE Leap Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Google Chrome Enterprise

August 2025

Download Google Chrome Enterprise product report

Buyer's Guide

Operating Systems (OS) for Business

July 2025

Download openSUSE Leap product report

Also Known As

Chrome Enterprise

No data available

Overview

Google Chrome Enterprise combines Chrome OS and Chrome Browser to enable work in the cloud. Manage users’ access to data, applications, and extensions without breaking a sweat. Work securely from anywhere, on any device. Your data is kept safe in the cloud.

Google

openSUSE Leap is a brand new way of building openSUSE and is new type of hybrid Linux distribution. Leap uses source from SUSE Linux Enterprise (SLE), which gives Leap a level of stability unmatched by other Linux distributions, and combines that with community developments to give users, developers and sysadmins the best stable Linux experience available. Contributor and enterprise efforts for Leap bridge a gap between matured packages and newer packages found in openSUSE’s other distribution Tumbleweed.

openSUSE

Sample Customers

Netflix, Coca Cola, Pinterest, Toyota, Vertex, LafargeHolcim, MedXM, DOT Comm, Whirlpool

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Google Chrome Enterprise vs. openSUSE Leap

July 2025

Free Report: Google Chrome Enterprise vs. openSUSE Leap

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Chrome Enterprise vs. openSUSE Leap and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Chrome Enterprise vs. openSUSE Leap report.

See our list of best Operating Systems (OS) for Business vendors.

We monitor all Operating Systems (OS) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.