GitHub CoPilot vs Retool comparison

Read 10 Retool reviews

640 Views
640 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitHub CoPilot

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

GitHub Copilot and Retool cater to different segments within the tech industry, with GitHub Copilot focused on enhancing developer productivity through automatically generated code suggestions, while Retool specializes in facilitating the creation of custom internal tools. Despite positive feedback on GitHub Copilot’s pricing and support, Retool is perceived as superior due to its valuable feature set and justifiable user value.

Features: GitHub Copilot is adept at generating code suggestions efficiently, thereby increasing productivity. It also features multi-language support, seamless integration with popular IDEs like Visual Studio Code and JetBrains, and facilitates learning through context-aware suggestions enhancing coding efficiency. Retool stands out with its drag-and-drop components, extensive API connectivity, and customizable pre-built integrations, allowing swift development and deployment of internal applications. It supports complex workflows with SQL and JavaScript, simplifying the tool-building process.

Room for Improvement: GitHub Copilot could enhance its feature for handling more complex coding tasks independently and improve code accuracy within varied contexts. Its integration scope could be broadened to include additional development environments, requiring minimal setup time. On the other hand, Retool could benefit from offering more documentation and tutorials for beginners, improving interface customization options, and reducing initial setup time to enhance user experience further.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub Copilot supports seamless integration with a wide range of IDEs, enabling developers to integrate it smoothly without affecting their workflow significantly. Retool provides an intuitive deployment model, ensuring easy setup and swift integration with existing infrastructure, underlined by responsive customer service to support users throughout the setup and usage phases.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub Copilot offers a competitive subscription model, providing favorable ROI through increased productivity and reduced coding time for development teams. Retool, despite higher initial setup costs, offers a considerable long-term ROI by optimizing the development and management of customized internal tools, making the initial investment worthwhile for many users.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub CoPilot vs. Retool Report (Updated: December 2025).

GitHub CoPilot vs. Retool

Download the complete report

Helped 879,310 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub CoPilot

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Code Assistants (2nd)

Retool

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

15th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Software Development (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of GitHub CoPilot is 5.2%, up from 4.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Retool is 1.0%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Rapid Application Development Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitHub CoPilot	5.2%
Retool	1.0%
Other	93.8%

Rapid Application Development Software

Featured Reviews

TusharShankar

QA Manager at Synechron

AI coding assistant has transformed development speed and supports learning new languages

Any technology comes with two things, or rather anything in this world has both sides, good and bad. LLMs also have the same thing. The bad part is for a person who is 100% dependent on AI because they won't be able to learn more if they are 100% dependent on that. The main thing is that there has to be restraint from our side. I won't say it is from the tool side, but from our side, we need to learn and we need to work on it. We need to review the code. That is one thing that we need to do from our end. From a technology perspective, it is designed to help us out, and it is totally on our side of thinking about how exactly we are going to use that. There is not any area for improvement from the tool side, but it is from the users altogether. Users should not be 100% reliant on AI or any LLMs. They need to work on it and they need to review the code.

Read full review

Yannick LE GAL

IT consultant for healthcare sector at Freelancer

Has provided a quick way to build mobile apps and could improve usability for non-technical users

The best features Retool offers include the ability to quickly create a mobile app and use this mobile app in a native mobile app for Android. I found the process of creating and deploying those mobile apps for Android with Retool to be smooth as the documentation is very good, and I found answers and examples to create a mobile app. I can access a debug mode in the mobile app which was really convenient to make tests and find what can be improved, where I have a problem, and how to correct it. Retool positively impacted my organization as the proof of concept we built gave us a way to convince power users and key users before developing the real software. It was a way to maintain the launch date of the project, which helped speed up the project timeline and save resources.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The document generation features are valuable."

"Efficiencies with GitHub CoPilot have improved by 30%, which means a quicker go-to market and a simplified way of documenting technical designs."

"When I write code, I feel like I have someone sitting with me to help me. Wherever I'm stuck, I just ask a question, and it provides guidance that I can use."

"Copilot enhanced our productivity through its AI capabilities."

"The CoPilot app that you can use while creating presentations is very useful."

"The product's initial setup is straightforward because it's pushed through the updates."

"GitHub CoPilot has good stability and performance."

"GitHub CoPilot helps us auto-complete code. The tool's context awareness benefits our projects because it identifies the context in which we are working and automatically proposes solutions that we use."

More GitHub CoPilot pros

"Retool positively impacted my organization as the proof of concept we built gave us a way to convince power users and key users before developing the real software."

"We can create the dashboards quickly."

"The most valuable feature of Retool is the workflow because I can integrate multiple features, such as RESTful API, JavaScript API, or different databases on the same dashboard."

"The stability is okay."

"Retool positively impacted my organization as the proof of concept we built gave us a way to convince power users and key users before developing the real software."

"Retool provides us with the opportunity to save time and be more efficient."

"Retool positively impacted my organization as the proof of concept we built gave us a way to convince power users and key users before developing the real software."

"Retool can be used with many applications as it is language independent; anyone can use it easily and create various visualizations regardless of their programming knowledge—this is the main reason I recommend it."

More Retool pros

Cons

"The tool needs to focus on integration, as it is the most important aspect. I would like to see some pre-designed modules included in my projects."

"They could improve the product in terms of integration with other tools."

"The problem arises when a bot is not well-designed, which frustrates customers."

"The technology offered by the product in the retail industry and banking processes has certain shortcomings, making them areas that can be improved."

"It cannot be fully depended on to build every component and run a large enterprise application without significant human intervention."

"Sometimes, if it is a bigger piece of code, it breaks in between."

"In certain instances, OpenAI didn't respond in the expected way. The responses were more general and didn't address the specific point."

"If the tool could focus on specific lines where changes are suggested, it would save time and reduce server load."

More GitHub CoPilot cons

"Retool, being a low-code/no-code platform, could improve by allowing users, particularly non-technical users, to use it more easily."

"In the mobile app development, you have to use JavaScript to interact with components, and for non-technical users, it's already too technical, so Retool has to add some integrated solutions."

"Retool should add more resource integration."

"AI tools, features, and machine learning capabilities should be added as they would be helpful in the future."

"The UI of Retool could be improved, as I am not fond of the current design, and there should be a platform for learning how to use Retool efficiently, especially since our software team customizes it for their needs, leaving the operational team with limited knowledge on how to customize it."

"Retool could enhance support, including efforts to establish support centers in Europe, which was lacking previously. However, the community is still in the growth phase, leading to potential delays in receiving responses to queries."

"One area for improvement in Retool is expanding its library support to include a broader range of third-party JavaScript libraries."

More Retool cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"GitHub CoPilot comes readily available for enterprise customers, so it's a free add-on if you already have GitHub's enterprise license."

"The product has a tiered pricing model that starts with a free version for individual developers but requires a separate license fee for enterprise use."

"The solution is costly."

"The pricing for GitHub Copilot is around ten dollars per month."

"GitHub CoPilot's pricing is reasonable. Our licensing costs were initially monthly, but then we switched to yearly payments. I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."

"There is a need to pay around 10 USD to be able to use the solution."

"GitHub CoPilot is less expensive than other solutions."

"We have a demo license. Once we understand what we'll do, we'll start with a paid license."

More GitHub CoPilot pricing and cost advice

"I don't know Retool's current pricing, but it cost around $12 per month earlier."

"The pricing is very expensive. It costs for each user, for automated users, open-end users, et cetera."

"For new users, evaluate the scale of their administrative needs as Retool provides excellent free services for smaller setups, but larger deployments might require transitioning to a paid plan."

"For me, I'm in India right now, and we have Retool's subscription for one team member for $10 per month."

"The tool is a little bit expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

14%

University

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub CoPilot?

The product is easy to integrate.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub CoPilot?

I am not fully aware of the pricing details as my company manages it, but I recall it was not inexpensive.

What needs improvement with GitHub CoPilot?

GitHub CoPilot should be integrated with different IDEs beyond VS Code, as it is currently only supported by VS Code.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Retool?

The pricing, setup cost, and licensing experience were good as the free plan was enough for us.

What needs improvement with Retool?

Retool, being a low-code/no-code platform, could improve by allowing users, particularly non-technical users, to use it more easily. In the mobile app development, you have to use JavaScript to int...

What is your primary use case for Retool?

My main use case for Retool involves an inventory app project. I built a mobile app to make an inventory of chemistry products. Retool helped me with that project as it was a good way to show a qui...

Blackbox.ai vs GitHub CoPilot

Comparisons

GitLab vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 22% of the time

Compared 12% of the time

Amazon Q vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 6% of the time

Claude for Enterprise vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 6% of the time

More GitHub CoPilot Competitors

Streamlit vs Retool

Compared 50% of the time

Pega Platform vs Retool

Compared 17% of the time

ToolJet vs Retool

Compared 13% of the time

AWS App Studio vs Retool

Compared 12% of the time

OutSystems vs Retool

Compared 9% of the time

More Retool Competitors

Product Reports

GitHub CoPilot

Download GitHub CoPilot product report

Download Retool product report

Overview

GitHub CoPilot accelerates developer productivity with code generation, test case creation, and code explanation. It provides context-aware suggestions, integrates with popular IDEs, and supports multiple languages.

GitHub CoPilot significantly boosts development efficiency by reducing coding and debugging time. Its user-friendly auto-complete and variable detection features streamline complex tasks, serving as a learning tool for developers. Areas needing improvement include its accuracy, stability, and broader integration with IDEs and languages. Users find the pricing strategy expensive and wish for enhanced contextual understanding, diverse result formats, and image support. Expanded functionality and better integration in highly regulated environments are important for future growth.

What are the most valued features of GitHub CoPilot?

Code Generation: Accelerates coding with smart suggestions.
Test Case Creation: Streamlines automated testing.
Code Explanation: Offers detailed insights into code segments.
Context-Aware Suggestions: Provides personalized assistance.
Multi-Language Support: Enhances versatility across programming languages.

Which benefits should users look for in reviews?

Increased Efficiency: Reduces time spent on coding tasks.
Enhanced Productivity: Speeds up the development process.
Learning Aid: Aids developers in understanding and creating complex code.
Task Automation: Facilitates automating repetitive coding tasks.

Utilized across industries to enhance application development and productivity, GitHub CoPilot assists in generating code snippets, writing code skeletons, analyzing documents, and automating workflows. It supports coding best practices, prompt engineering, and natural language processing. Developers leverage its capabilities for creating meeting summaries, report recommendations, and content ideas, thereby optimizing workflow efficiency.

GitHub

Retool enables rapid construction of internal tools with minimal coding, streamlining workflows across HR, customer support, and compliance. Praised for its drag-and-drop interface, extensive component library, and SQL support, it boosts organizational efficiency by automating tasks and enhancing data management.

GitHub CoPilot vs. Retool