GitHub CoPilot vs Retool comparison

Read 7 Retool reviews

261 Views
170 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitHub CoPilot

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

GitHub Copilot and Retool cater to different segments within the tech industry, with GitHub Copilot focused on enhancing developer productivity through automatically generated code suggestions, while Retool specializes in facilitating the creation of custom internal tools. Despite positive feedback on GitHub Copilot’s pricing and support, Retool is perceived as superior due to its valuable feature set and justifiable user value.

Features: GitHub Copilot is adept at generating code suggestions efficiently, thereby increasing productivity. It also features multi-language support, seamless integration with popular IDEs like Visual Studio Code and JetBrains, and facilitates learning through context-aware suggestions enhancing coding efficiency. Retool stands out with its drag-and-drop components, extensive API connectivity, and customizable pre-built integrations, allowing swift development and deployment of internal applications. It supports complex workflows with SQL and JavaScript, simplifying the tool-building process.

Room for Improvement: GitHub Copilot could enhance its feature for handling more complex coding tasks independently and improve code accuracy within varied contexts. Its integration scope could be broadened to include additional development environments, requiring minimal setup time. On the other hand, Retool could benefit from offering more documentation and tutorials for beginners, improving interface customization options, and reducing initial setup time to enhance user experience further.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub Copilot supports seamless integration with a wide range of IDEs, enabling developers to integrate it smoothly without affecting their workflow significantly. Retool provides an intuitive deployment model, ensuring easy setup and swift integration with existing infrastructure, underlined by responsive customer service to support users throughout the setup and usage phases.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub Copilot offers a competitive subscription model, providing favorable ROI through increased productivity and reduced coding time for development teams. Retool, despite higher initial setup costs, offers a considerable long-term ROI by optimizing the development and management of customized internal tools, making the initial investment worthwhile for many users.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub CoPilot vs. Retool Report (Updated: April 2025).

GitHub CoPilot vs. Retool

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,471 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub CoPilot

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Code Assistants (2nd)

Retool

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

18th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of GitHub CoPilot is 5.6%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Retool is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Rapid Application Development Software

Featured Reviews

TarunRevalla

Software Engineer at Yext Inc

Saves time with context-aware code suggestions and seamless integration

In terms of improvements for Copilot, I haven't considered much since it offers many useful interactions. It integrates well with GitHub repositories, tracks changes on PRs, and provides valuable suggestions where applicable. There is excellent support across various code editors like JetBrains, VS Code, and NeoGen. I also run many automations within GitHub. When an NPR is raised, it automatically provides suggestions, which is part of the enterprise edition without limitations. While I don't see immediate room for improvement, one suggestion is for Copilot to provide specific suggestions for certain lines of code instead of rewriting entire sections. If the tool could focus on specific lines where changes are suggested, it would save time and reduce server load.

Read full review

Saurabh Tiwari

Back End Developer at Medha

Easy to use, I don't need to write extensive code and built-in components helps to develop tools

Retool provides multiple tools and functionalities that we can use. However, there are restrictions on the front-end side. From the back-end side, we can use anything, but on the front-end, we have limited tools. This limits our ability to enhance functionality. For example, if I'm creating a tool for you to collect feedback from your clients or users, we have limited resources on the front-end. For the back-end, we have unlimited resources, but for the front-end, we are restricted to creating dashboards and similar tools. If you want to enable other functionalities, we can add them, but this is a limitation on the front-end side.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The CoPilot app that you can use while creating presentations is very useful."

"Initially, OpenAI is free, but you'll need to pay for it later."

"GitHub Copilot can improve productivity by up to 40%, especially for experienced developers. Senior developers often spend more time reviewing code, which can make the code review process a bit longer."

"The platform's most valuable feature is its code suggestion capability, which leverages AI to provide context-aware suggestions."

"The solution increases coding efficiency."

"GitHub CoPilot is easy to use even for beginners and it supports the integration with CI/CD tools."

"The document generation features are valuable."

"The solution's most valuable features are context awareness, multi language support, integration with popular IDs like Visual Studio Code or JetBrains, and reduced coding time."

More GitHub CoPilot pros

"We can create the dashboards quickly."

"There are several key aspects to Retool that make it stand out. Firstly, its extensive range of components makes integration straightforward. Secondly, its support for SQL and JavaScript allows for the implementation of complex logic, which is particularly beneficial for developers like yourself with experience in .NET development."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is connectivity with APIs and other databases."

"The stability is okay."

"Retool's most valuable features are its drag-and-drop components and the ability to customize them extensively."

"The most valuable feature of Retool is the workflow because I can integrate multiple features, such as RESTful API, JavaScript API, or different databases on the same dashboard."

"Retool provides us with the opportunity to save time and be more efficient."

Cons

"The tool must improve its ability to work with multiple files."

"The limitation is based on the training dataset and the number of repositories."

"It would be useful if we could use the solution to create documents, not only prompts."

"There's room for improvement to ensure that suggestions align more precisely with the context of what I'm seeking, minimizing instances of unrelated or inaccurate code suggestions."

"While I don't see immediate room for improvement, one suggestion is for Copilot to provide specific suggestions for certain lines of code instead of rewriting entire sections."

"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"In certain instances, OpenAI didn't respond in the expected way. The responses were more general and didn't address the specific point."

"Some of the suggestions provided by GitHub CoPilot are not accurate, making it an area of concern where improvements are required."

More GitHub CoPilot cons

"Retool should add more resource integration."

"The components are changed frequently, which is very irritating."

"The solution lacks inbuilt customization to customize bar charts."

"Retool could enhance support, including efforts to establish support centers in Europe, which was lacking previously. However, the community is still in the growth phase, leading to potential delays in receiving responses to queries."

"There are restrictions on the front-end side."

"One area for improvement in Retool is expanding its library support to include a broader range of third-party JavaScript libraries."

"The part where we can add some custom logic or custom plugins could be better."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have a demo license. Once we understand what we'll do, we'll start with a paid license."

"The pricing is reasonable. I think it is 10 USD per user."

"A personal license is priced at ten dollars per month, while a professional or enterprise license costs nineteen dollars per user, and these rates are consistent for all users."

"GitHub CoPilot is less expensive than other solutions."

"The product offers a free version and a paid version. Whether to choose the product's free version or paid version depends on the size of the company where it will be used."

"GitHub CoPilot's pricing is reasonable. Our licensing costs were initially monthly, but then we switched to yearly payments. I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."

"The pricing for GitHub Copilot is around ten dollars per month."

"We have a license but need another one for the GitHub CoPilot tool."

More GitHub CoPilot pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is very expensive. It costs for each user, for automated users, open-end users, et cetera."

"For me, I'm in India right now, and we have Retool's subscription for one team member for $10 per month."

"For new users, evaluate the scale of their administrative needs as Retool provides excellent free services for smaller setups, but larger deployments might require transitioning to a paid plan."

"I don't know Retool's current pricing, but it cost around $12 per month earlier."

"The tool is a little bit expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,471 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

20%

Comms Service Provider

16%

University

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub CoPilot?

The product is easy to integrate.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub CoPilot?

They recently made Copilot free to use up to a certain limit, which is a positive change. The pricing aligns with other AI agents like Chargebee and Anthropic Cloud. The ability to switch between m...

What needs improvement with GitHub CoPilot?

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Retool?

For new users, evaluate the scale of their administrative needs as Retool provides excellent free services for smaller setups, but larger deployments might require transitioning to a paid plan.

What needs improvement with Retool?

One area for improvement in Retool is expanding its library support to include a broader range of third-party JavaScript libraries. This would enhance the tool's versatility and allow more complex ...

What is your primary use case for Retool?

I employ Retool primarily to build admin panels that effectively manage office and backend project staff. These panels facilitate the management of various organizational functions and streamline u...

Blackbox.ai vs GitHub CoPilot

Comparisons

GitLab vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 35% of the time

Compared 9% of the time

Claude vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 8% of the time

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 7% of the time

Amazon Q vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 6% of the time

More GitHub CoPilot Competitors

Streamlit vs Retool

Compared 72% of the time

Pega Platform vs Retool

Compared 28% of the time

More Retool Competitors

Product Reports

Download GitHub CoPilot product report

GitHub CoPilot

May 2025

Download Retool product report

May 2025

Overview

GitHub CoPilot accelerates developer productivity with code generation, test case creation, and code explanation. It provides context-aware suggestions, integrates with popular IDEs, and supports multiple languages.

GitHub CoPilot significantly boosts development efficiency by reducing coding and debugging time. Its user-friendly auto-complete and variable detection features streamline complex tasks, serving as a learning tool for developers. Areas needing improvement include its accuracy, stability, and broader integration with IDEs and languages. Users find the pricing strategy expensive and wish for enhanced contextual understanding, diverse result formats, and image support. Expanded functionality and better integration in highly regulated environments are important for future growth.

What are the most valued features of GitHub CoPilot?

Code Generation: Accelerates coding with smart suggestions.
Test Case Creation: Streamlines automated testing.
Code Explanation: Offers detailed insights into code segments.
Context-Aware Suggestions: Provides personalized assistance.
Multi-Language Support: Enhances versatility across programming languages.

Which benefits should users look for in reviews?

Increased Efficiency: Reduces time spent on coding tasks.
Enhanced Productivity: Speeds up the development process.
Learning Aid: Aids developers in understanding and creating complex code.
Task Automation: Facilitates automating repetitive coding tasks.

Utilized across industries to enhance application development and productivity, GitHub CoPilot assists in generating code snippets, writing code skeletons, analyzing documents, and automating workflows. It supports coding best practices, prompt engineering, and natural language processing. Developers leverage its capabilities for creating meeting summaries, report recommendations, and content ideas, thereby optimizing workflow efficiency.

GitHub

Retool enables rapid construction of internal tools with minimal coding, streamlining workflows across HR, customer support, and compliance. Praised for its drag-and-drop interface, extensive component library, and SQL support, it boosts organizational efficiency by automating tasks and enhancing data management.