GitGuardian Platform vs Tines comparison

Read 4 Tines reviews

2,613 Views
235 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitGuardian Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

GitGuardian Platform and Tines are both strong contenders in the realm of security and automation, with distinct specialties. GitGuardian leads in secrets detection, making it invaluable for identifying and managing code secrets. Meanwhile, Tines shines in automating security workflows, justifying its investment through its advanced automation capabilities.

Features: GitGuardian Platform provides robust secrets detection and monitoring of code repositories, compliance tools, and can integrate easily into developer environments for seamless security management. Tines excels with its powerful orchestration of security interactions, offering customizable automation capabilities and an extensive security operations layer.

Room for Improvement: GitGuardian could enhance its real-time scanning capability, improve support for private code repositories, and offer more detailed analytics dashboards. Tines may work on offering more granular access control, enhancing user interface navigation, and improving integration speed with new APIs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitGuardian offers both cloud and on-premises solutions with easy integration into existing developer workflows, providing efficient setup and initial simplicity. Tines supports flexible deployment models with numerous integrations, and robust customer service ensures smooth execution of complex automation workflows.

Pricing and ROI: GitGuardian offers competitive pricing, quick deployment, and rapid ROI for those focusing on securing their software development lifecycle. Tines, perceived as a larger investment, delivers significant ROI through its extensive automation capabilities, offering long-term operational efficiencies. GitGuardian is a cost-effective choice for secrets management, while Tines justifies its price with its wide-ranging automation and operational improvements.

To learn more, read our detailed GitGuardian Platform vs. Tines Report (Updated: December 2025).

GitGuardian Platform vs. Tines

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitGuardian Platform

Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)

5th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (8th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (4th), Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (8th), Software Supply Chain Security (5th), DevSecOps (4th), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (2nd)

Tines

Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)

18th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (11th), AI-Powered Security Automation (1st), AI IT Support (26th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) category, the mindshare of GitGuardian Platform is 1.1%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tines is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitGuardian Platform	1.1%
Tines	0.7%
Other	98.2%

Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)

Featured Reviews

Ney Roman

DevOps Engineer at Deuna App

Facilitates efficient secret management and improves development processes

Regarding the exceptions in GitGuardian Platform, we know that within the platform we have a way to accept a path or a directory from a repository, but it is not that visible at the very beginning. You have to figure out where to search for it, and once you have it, it is really good, but it is not that visible at the beginning. This should be made more exposed. The documentation could be better because it was not that comprehensively documented. When we started working with GitGuardian Platform, it was difficult to find some specific use cases, and we were not aware of that. It might have improved now, but at that time, it was not something we would recommend.

Read full review

VikramSingh8

Security Delivery Manager at Accenture

Automation simplifies workflows with no code and excellent support

Reporting and dashboards could be more advanced for deeper analysis. Tines has its own dashboard, which displays information like how many stories have been created and how many automations have taken place. However, the reporting and dashboard are not advanced; they are quite basic, with fewer customizable options. The look and feel of the dashboard could be enhanced. Another area for improvement is in terms of documentation, as every tool and company has its own knowledge base.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Presently, we find the pre-commit hooks more useful."

"It enables us to identify leaks that happened in the past and remediate current leaks as they happen in near real-time. When I say "near real-time," I mean within minutes. These are industry-leading remediation timelines for credential leaks. Previously, it might have taken companies years to get credentials detected or remediated. We can do it in minutes."

"When they give you a description of what happened, it's really easy to follow and to retest. And the ability to retest is something that you don't have in other solutions. If a secret was detected, you can retest if it is still there. It will show you if it is in the history."

"A high number of our exposures are remediated by developers before security needs to step in, as the self-healing playbook process engages them automatically. This results in issues being resolved within minutes, saving significant effort from the security team in tracking down or communicating with developers."

"I like that GitGuardian automatically notifies the developer who committed the change. The security team doesn't need to act as the intermediary and tell the developer there is an alert. The alert goes directly to the developer."

"GitGuardian has also helped us develop a security-minded culture. We're serious about shift left and getting better about code security. I think a lot of people are getting more mindful about what a secret is."

"It's fantastic. We have checked a couple of other vendors and seen their results, which are quite inferior to the amount of detail that the GitGuardian Platform provides. With instantaneous notifications connected to our Slack platform, it allows us to deal quickly with incidents."

"The stability of the GitGuardian Platform is excellent."

More GitGuardian Platform pros

"The tool was vendor-neutral."

"The best thing is that it's no code, so it doesn't require coding knowledge."

"The best advantage is the no-code automation, excellent customer support services, and ease of integration with other tools."

"One of the most valuable features is that it’s a low-code solution."

Cons

"The documentation could be improved because when we started working with GitGuardian, it was difficult to find specific use cases."

"It could be easier. They have a CLI tool that engineers can run on their laptops, but getting engineers to install the tool is a manual process. I would like to see them have it integrated into one of those developer tools, e.g., VS Code or JetBrains, so developers don't have to think about it."

"The purchasing process is convoluted compared to Snyk, the other tool we use. It's like night and day because you only need to punch in your credit card, and you're set. With GitGuardian, getting a quote took two or three weeks. We paid for it in December but have not settled that payment yet."

"I would like to see more fine-grained access controls when tickets are assigned for incidents. I would like the ability to provide more controls to the team leads or the product managers so that they can drive what we, the AppSec team, are doing."

"The main thing for me is the customization for some of the healthcare-specific identifiers that we want to validate. There should be some ability, which is coming in the near future, to have custom identifiers. Being in healthcare, we have pretty specific patterns that we need to match for PHI or PII. Having that would add a little bit extra to it."

"GitGuardian encompasses many secrets that companies might have, but we are a Microsoft-only organization, so there are some limitations there in terms of their honey tokens. I'd like for it to not be limited to Amazon-based tokens. It would be nice to see a broader set of providers that you could pick from."

"The documentation could be improved because when we started working with GitGuardian, it was difficult to find specific use cases."

"I would like to see improvement in some of the user interface features... When one secret is leaked in multiple files or multiple repositories, it will appear on the dashboard. But when you click on that secret, all the occurrences will appear on the page. It would be better to have one secret per occurrence, directly, so that we don't have to click to get to the list of all the occurrences."

More GitGuardian Platform cons

"Tines was a little bit more expensive than Torq."

"Maybe Tines can add more features and demonstrations, like videos on how to use the features within the tool."

"Reporting and dashboards could be more advanced for deeper analysis."

"They started implementing some AI, and their AI is isolated."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have seen a return on investment. The amount of time that we would have spent manually doing this definitely outpaces the cost of GitGuardian. It is saving us about $35,000 a year, so I would say the ROI is about $20,000 a year."

"It's competitively priced compared to others. Overall, the secret detection sector is expensive, but we are very happy with the value we get."

"I am only aware of the base price. I do not know what happened with our purchasing team in discussions with GitGuardian. I was not privy to the overall contract, but in terms of the base MSRP price, I found it reasonable."

"It could be cheaper. When GitHub secrets monitoring solution goes to general access and general availability, GitGuardian might be in a little bit of trouble from the competition, and maybe then they might lower their prices. The GitGuardian solution is great. I'm just concerned that they're not GitHub."

"We don't have a huge number of users, but its yearly rate was quite reasonable when compared to other per-seat solutions that we looked at... Having a free plan for a small number of users was really great. If you're a small team, I don't see why you wouldn't want to get started with it."

"The pricing and licensing are fair. It isn't very expensive and it's good value."

"It's not cheap, but it's not crazy expensive either."

"The internal side is cheap per user. It is annual pricing based on the number of users."

More GitGuardian Platform pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

16%

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	13

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?

It's also worth mentioning that GitGuardian is unique because they have a free tier that we've been using for the first twelve months. It provides full functionality for smaller teams. We're a smal...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?

It's competitively priced compared to others. Overall, the secret detection sector is expensive, but we are happy with the value we get.

What needs improvement with GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?

GitGuardian Platform does what it is designed to do, but it still generates many false positives. We utilize the automated playbooks from GitGuardian Platform, and we are enhancing them. We will pr...

What needs improvement with Tines?

What is your primary use case for Tines?

I am Vikram Singh, I work for top service based multinational brand and I am responsible for delivering Tines services. Essentially, I am working on it, and I am leading one of the source services ...

What advice do you have for others considering Tines?

When you start working with Tines, ensure you pursue the Tines certifications. They offer these free certifications when they become your partner. Overall, I would rate Tines a nine out of ten.

SonarQube vs GitGuardian Platform

Comparisons

Compared 9% of the time

SafeGuard Cyber Security vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Snyk vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 8% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More GitGuardian Platform Competitors

Torq vs Tines

Compared 37% of the time

Splunk SOAR vs Tines

Compared 14% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Tines

Compared 10% of the time

Blink Ops vs Tines

Compared 10% of the time

Swimlane vs Tines

Compared 8% of the time

More Tines Competitors

Product Reports

Download GitGuardian Platform product report

GitGuardian Platform

January 2026

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

December 2025

Download Tines product report

Also Known As

GitGuardian Internal Monitoring, GitGuardian Public Monitoring

No data available

Interactive Demo

GitGuardian

Demo not available

Overview

GitGuardian is a comprehensive platform focused on enhancing Non-Human Identity security by integrating Secrets Security and Secrets Observability to detect and manage secrets across development environments.

As cybersecurity threats increasingly target NHIs like service accounts and applications, GitGuardian offers a robust solution by supporting over 450 types of secrets and deploying honeytokens for additional defense. Trusted by leading organizations and developers, its monitoring and quick alert system enable effective detection and management of sensitive data, strengthening operational security across platforms.

What are the key features of GitGuardian?

Secrets Detection: Identifies various secrets types such as AWS keys and passwords.
Quick Alerts: Provides timely notifications for immediate risk management.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with development tools and workflows.
Dev in the Loop: Facilitates rapid issue resolution.
Historical Scanning: Enhances security through thorough scanning practices.

What benefits and ROI should companies consider?

Efficiency: Streamlined remediation processes with minimal false positives.
Customizability: Adaptable detection features cater to specific needs.
Risk Reduction: Proactive management of sensitive data threats.
Team Integration: Improved collaboration through connected workflows.
Development Continuity: Maintains seamless operation during security processes.

In the tech industry, GitGuardian is employed to safeguard APIs and sensitive credentials across code repositories like GitHub. Companies benefit from instant alerts and integrations with tools like Slack, effectively managing risks and enhancing security policies. While popular in sectors dependent on development agility, there is room for further improvement in customization and integration to meet specific industry needs.

GitGuardian

Tines offers no-code and low-code automation for users to automate tasks without coding expertise, integrating seamlessly with APIs to enhance incident management and security operations.

Known for a vendor-neutral approach, Tines provides detailed documentation and live chat support, allowing for effective integration with other tools, scheduling capabilities, and streamlined processes that save time and effort. Users find it intuitive for efficient task handling, making manual intervention unnecessary. Challenges include the need for more comprehensive documentation and instructional videos, as well as improvements in AI integration and reporting aesthetics. Pricing is also noted as higher compared to alternatives.

What are the most important features of Tines?

No-code and low-code automation: Enables task automation without coding knowledge.
API integration: Facilitates enhanced automation for security operations.
Vendor-neutral approach: Promotes unbiased integration across various tools.
Detailed documentation: Provides users with comprehensive guides and support.
Scheduling capabilities: Allows users to automate workflows efficiently.

What benefits and ROI can users expect from Tines?

Time savings: Automates tasks to reduce manual processes.
Improved efficiency: Streamlines security operations, enhancing productivity.
Comprehensive task handling: Offers intuitive tools for managing complex tasks easily.

Tines primarily serves organizations in the security sector, automating security operations such as alert detection and managed detection and response. It's utilized extensively in security operation centers for tasks like phishing email processing, ticket creation, IOC investigations, and ticket assignments within enterprise security frameworks, with multiple teams delivering Tines services to enhance task handling efficiency.

Sample Customers

Widely adopted by developer communities, GitGuardian is used by over 600 thousand developers and leading companies, including Snowflake, Orange, Iress, Mirantis, Maven Wave, ING, BASF, and Bouygues Telecom.

Information Not Available