GitGuardian Platform vs Safetica ONE comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
GitGuardian Logo
787 views|124 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Safetica Logo
2,087 views|935 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between GitGuardian Platform and Safetica ONE based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed GitGuardian Platform vs. Safetica ONE Report (Updated: May 2024).
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I like GitGuardian's instant response. When you have an incident, it's reported immediately. The interface gives you a great overview of your current leaked secrets.""Some of our teams have hundreds of repositories, so filtering by team saves a lot of time and effort.""GitGuardian has helped to increase our security team's productivity. Now, we don't need to call the developers all the time and ask what they are working on. I feel the solution bridged the gap between our team and the developers, which is really great. I feel that we need that in our company, since some of the departments are just doing whatever and you don't know what they are doing. I think GitGuardian does a good job of bridging the gap. It saves us about 10 hours per week.""You can also assign tasks to specific teams or people to complete, such as assigning something to the "blue team" or saying that this person needs to do this, and that person needs to do that. That is a great feature because you can actually manage your team internally in GitGuardian.""GitGuardian has many features that fit our use cases. We have our internal policies on secret exposure, and our code is hosted on GitLab, so we need to prevent secrets from reaching GitLab because our customers worry that GitLab is exposed. One of the great features is the pre-receive hook. It prevents commits from being pushed to the repository by activating the hook on the remotes, which stops the developers from pushing to the remote. The secrets don't reach GitLab, and it isn't exposed.""The most valuable feature of GitGuardian is that it finds tokens and passwords. That's why we need this tool. It minimizes the possibility of security violations that we cannot find on our own.""I like that GitGuardian automatically notifies the developer who committed the change. The security team doesn't need to act as the intermediary and tell the developer there is an alert. The alert goes directly to the developer.""The entire GitGuardian solution is valuable. The product is doing its job and showing us many things. We get many false positives, but the ability to automatically display potential leaks when developers commit is valuable. The dashboards show you recent and historical commits, and we have a full scan that shows historical leaked secrets."

More GitGuardian Platform Pros →

"Safetica ONE is easy to use and set up. We can set up rules and policies quickly.""The most valuable feature is the data classification.""The solution's most valuable feature is data leak protection.""It is a stable solution...The initial setup of Safetica ONE is simple.""ESET Safetica is a cost-effective solution for customers who need a small quantity along with a competitive price.""The most valuable things about Safetica ONE are its comprehensive features, competitive pricing, and a strong focus on data security and compliance.""When you subscribe to the DLP, the system manages and protects your files well from the cloud.""The current version of the solution is stable...It is easy to scale the solution."

More Safetica ONE Pros →

Cons
"Right now, we are waiting for improvement in the RBAC support for GitGuardian.""We have encountered occasional difficulties with the Single Sign-On process.""GitGuardian encompasses many secrets that companies might have, but we are a Microsoft-only organization, so there are some limitations there in terms of their honey tokens. I'd like for it to not be limited to Amazon-based tokens. It would be nice to see a broader set of providers that you could pick from.""They could give a developer access to a dashboard for their team's repositories that just shows their repository secrets. I think more could be exposed to developers.""GitGuardian could have more detailed information on what software engineers can do. It only provides some highly generic feedback when a secret is detected. They should have outside documentation. We send this to our software engineers, who are still doing the commits. It's the wrong way to work, but they are accustomed to doing it this way. When they go into that ticket, they see a few instructions that might be confusing. If I see a leaked secret committed two years ago, it's not enough to undo that commit. I need to go in there, change all my code to utilize GitHub secrets, and go on AWS to validate my key.""It could be easier. They have a CLI tool that engineers can run on their laptops, but getting engineers to install the tool is a manual process. I would like to see them have it integrated into one of those developer tools, e.g., VS Code or JetBrains, so developers don't have to think about it.""I would like to see more fine-grained access controls when tickets are assigned for incidents. I would like the ability to provide more controls to the team leads or the product managers so that they can drive what we, the AppSec team, are doing.""There is room for improvement in GitGuardian on Azure DevOps. The implementation is a bit hard there. This is one of the things we requested help with. I would not say their support is not good, but they need them to improve in helping customers on that side."

More GitGuardian Platform Cons →

"One area for improvement in Safetica is its firewall integration feature.""The solution's most valuable feature is data leak protection.""Safetica ONE fails to support Linux.""ESET Safetica’s stability could be improved.""The product needs to improve support.""There are some minor issues with the price and support of the solution that needs to be improved.""This solution could be improved if it was available on Linux as well. Currently it can only be deployed on Mac and Windows.""Safetica One has every other thing that you need, so I cannot give Safetica NXT a higher mark because it does not have the full features of the enterprise solutions."

More Safetica ONE Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We don't have a huge number of users, but its yearly rate was quite reasonable when compared to other per-seat solutions that we looked at... Having a free plan for a small number of users was really great. If you're a small team, I don't see why you wouldn't want to get started with it."
  • "It's a little bit expensive."
  • "You get what you pay for. It's one of the more expensive solutions, but it is very good, and the low false positive rate is a really appealing factor."
  • "The pricing and licensing are fair. It isn't very expensive and it's good value."
  • "The internal side is cheap per user. It is annual pricing based on the number of users."
  • "We have seen a return on investment. The amount of time that we would have spent manually doing this definitely outpaces the cost of GitGuardian. It is saving us about $35,000 a year, so I would say the ROI is about $20,000 a year."
  • "It could be cheaper. When GitHub secrets monitoring solution goes to general access and general availability, GitGuardian might be in a little bit of trouble from the competition, and maybe then they might lower their prices. The GitGuardian solution is great. I'm just concerned that they're not GitHub."
  • "It's not cheap, but it's not crazy expensive either."
  • More GitGuardian Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The licensing cost for this solution depends on the deal size and your use case. In our instance, it costs $35 per user per year. This is a reasonable price."
  • "The pricing for ESET Safetica is less as compared to other solutions. The customers have to pay only for the license."
  • "Customers need to pay for a yearly license per device."
  • "Safetica ONE is expensive."
  • More Safetica ONE Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It's also worth mentioning that GitGuardian is unique because they have a free tier that we've been using for the first twelve months. It provides full functionality for smaller teams. We're a smaller… more »
    Top Answer:The purchasing process is convoluted compared to Snyk, the other tool we use. It's like night and day because you only need to punch in your credit card, and you're set. With GitGuardian, getting a… more »
    Top Answer:GitGuardian had a really nice feature that allowed you to compare all the public GitHub repositories against your code base and see if your code leaked. They discontinued it for some reason about… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable things about Safetica ONE are its comprehensive features, competitive pricing, and a strong focus on data security and compliance.
    Top Answer:The SafeticaONE is great platform if youre looking for solution with DLP with Insider threat protection and Data Classification with UEBA. It is one of the best solution when it comes to SME customers… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    787
    Comparisons
    124
    Reviews
    14
    Average Words per Review
    1,390
    Rating
    9.0
    Views
    2,087
    Comparisons
    935
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    280
    Rating
    7.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    GitGuardian Internal Monitoring
    Learn More
    Overview

    GitGuardian helps organizations detect and fix vulnerabilities in source code at every step of the software development lifecycle. With GitGuardian’s policy engine, security teams can monitor and enforce rules across their VCS, DevOps tools, and infrastructure-as-code configurations.

    Widely adopted by developer communities, GitGuardian is used by more than 500,000 developers and is the #1 app in the security category on the GitHub Marketplace. GitGuardian is also trusted by leading companies, including Instacart, Genesys, Orange, Iress, Beyond Identity, NOW: Pensions, and Stedi.

    GitGuardian Platform includes automated secrets detection and remediation. By reducing the risks of secrets exposure across the SDLC, GitGuardian helps software-driven organizations strengthen their security posture and comply with frameworks and standards.

    Its detection engine is trained against more than a billion public GitHub commits every year, and it covers 350+ types of secrets such as API keys, database connection strings, private keys, certificates, and more.

    GitGuardian brings security and development teams together with automated remediation playbooks and collaboration features to resolve incidents fast and in full. By pulling developers closer to the remediation process, organizations can achieve higher incident closing rates and shorter fix times.

    The platform integrates across the DevOps toolchain, including native support for continuously scanning VCS platforms like GitHub, Gitlab, Azure DevOps and Bitbucket or CI/CD tools like Jenkins, CircleCI, Travis CI, GitLab pipelines, and many more. It also integrates with ticketing and messaging systems like Splunk, PagerDuty, Jira and Slack to support teams with their incident remediation workflows. GitGuardian is offered as a SaaS platform but can also be hosted on-premise for organizations operating in highly regulated industries or with strict data privacy requirements.

    Discover, classify, analyze, and protect data intuitively with a seamless user experience. Stop threats and stay compliant with regulations and industry standards.​

    Sample Customers
    Automox, 66degrees (ex Cloudbakers), Iress, Now:Pensions, Payfit, Orange, BouyguesTelecom, Seequent, Stedi, Talend, Snowflake... 
    Mitsubishi Motors, Canon
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company28%
    Insurance Company11%
    Wholesaler/Distributor11%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider22%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Media Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Retailer6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise28%
    Large Enterprise36%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise62%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business75%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise44%
    Buyer's Guide
    GitGuardian Platform vs. Safetica ONE
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitGuardian Platform vs. Safetica ONE and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    GitGuardian Platform is ranked 6th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 21 reviews while Safetica ONE is ranked 12th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 8 reviews. GitGuardian Platform is rated 9.0, while Safetica ONE is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of GitGuardian Platform writes "It dramatically improved our ability to detect secrets, saved us time, and reduced our mean time to remediation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Safetica ONE writes "A cost-effective solution that can be used for regulatory compliance, but its stability could be improved". GitGuardian Platform is most compared with SonarQube, Cycode, GitHub Advanced Security, Snyk and Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, whereas Safetica ONE is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, CoSoSys Endpoint Protector, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Symantec Data Loss Prevention and Digital Guardian. See our GitGuardian Platform vs. Safetica ONE report.

    See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

    We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.