


McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention and Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline compete in the data protection and network visibility categories, respectively. McAfee holds the advantage in environments requiring robust data loss prevention, while Gigamon is superior for organizations focusing on network performance and analysis.
Features: McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is known for its strong data protection capabilities, making it valuable in complex environments like those with virtual machines and cloud systems. It offers user-friendly administration and comprehensive endpoint security. Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline provides enhanced network visibility and performance optimization, with features such as packet filtering and traffic aggregation that are crucial for analyzing network traffic.
Room for Improvement: McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention faces issues with high resource consumption and a complicated user interface. Users desire a lighter agent, better management console, especially for virtual environments, and improved customer support. Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline needs better cloud monitoring integration and more comprehensive internal traffic visibility to reduce reliance on additional tools.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention offers various deployment options, including on-premises and cloud, but has poor customer support in some regions. Its technical support is often unresponsive or costly. Gigamon provides hybrid and on-premises deployment, receiving positive technical support feedback, although both could benefit from a simplified deployment process.
Pricing and ROI: McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is considered expensive due to its complex licensing models, although users report a positive ROI from its comprehensive protection features. Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline is also pricey, with costs justified by network optimization benefits. Perceptions of ROI vary depending on organizational needs.
For the small project I was working on, using the basic tier provided a huge improvement at zero cost.
In terms of return on investment with Cloudflare, it costs my time to set them up, but basically once they're set up, it's done.
Cloudflare does not offer hands-on technical support to fix customer problems but rather a self-service model.
I would rate the technical support with Cloudflare as excellent every time I've had to call them.
I have primarily worked not with the tool's customer support but with the product's sales engineers and technical sales engineers, who seem to know their stuff.
The technical support by Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline is good because it has a local architect in my area.
Improvements could be made in response time or quality as all of them can be rated a seven.
It is a SaaS tool, but the fact that they have workloads deployed across the world proves that it is a highly scalable tool.
The tool offers very good performance, even during high-traffic periods.
I rate the solution’s scalability an eight out of ten.
I rate the solution’s stability an eight out of ten.
The service is very stable with no impacts during high-traffic periods.
Sometimes there are some issues in the product itself; whenever they release a new version, vulnerabilities come into the picture, and we need to update the product to mitigate such issues.
Despite these challenges, overall, Cloudflare remains the preferred solution compared to Azure, AWS CloudFront, and Google Cloud Armor.
Areas like how assessment, discovery, and payload are dealt with and how it all comes into your organization can be considered when trying to make suggestions to Cloudflare for improvements.
There are some performance considerations when it comes to dynamic content that involves fetching data from databases or using APIs.
Sometimes there are some issues in the product itself; whenever they release a new version, vulnerabilities come into the picture, and we need to update the product to mitigate such issues.
I see enhancement in reporting for McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention as a potential area of improvement to think from a data asset perspective, not from a policy perspective, and do more analysis regarding the user's perspective rather than the policy's perspective.
I find it to be cheap.
I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.
The tool is a premium product, so it is very expensive.
I rate the pricing for McAfee as competitive compared to other companies; they are in the same range, not a cheap product and not an expensive product.
The most valuable features of the solution are performance and security.
Techniques like minification and image compression reduce the size of assets, leading to better performance and faster user load times.
The solution has been able to compare it to the market, and I think the product has taken great strides in automating quite a bit of things, and they use a lot of AI.
The Pipeline's Comprehensive Insights into data flows have helped improve operational efficiency and security.
We are just restricting data to be uploaded, which is the best option that allows us to control organizational data, making it the biggest benefit for us in McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention.
I find unique value in McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention specifically in controlling the application from a DLP perspective; when a computer downloads a package, you can understand where it downloaded this package from, and you can create a policy regarding the source of the download.
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 46 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 25 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 5 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 18 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
Cloudflare enhances web performance and security with features like CDN caching and DDoS mitigation while providing easy DNS management and intuitive setup through its user-friendly dashboard.
Cloudflare is recognized for its comprehensive web security and performance solutions. Speed improvements are achieved through caching mechanisms and DDoS protection, combining ease of DNS management with flexible page rules. The robust analytics and threat insight tools provide valuable data, assisted by a user-friendly dashboard allowing quick setup and configuration. An API offers dynamic DNS settings ensuring low latency and high performance across the globe.
What are Cloudflare's key features?Cloudflare finds utility across industries for DNS management and defense mechanisms. Its content delivery network assures fast content distribution and fortified security. Businesses integrate features like web application firewalls, load balancing, end-to-end SSL, and zero trust to protect websites from cyber threats while ensuring resilience and reliable performance.
Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline is a comprehensive network visibility solution that provides real-time insights into network traffic. It offers SSL inspection and mobile network monitoring for traffic monitoring purposes. The solution optimizes networks, aids in security inspection, and improves firewall performance. It is praised for its performance, power, straightforward integration, stability, and ease of initial setup.
With Gigamon, organizations can gain complete visibility into their network traffic, identify potential threats, and take proactive measures to prevent them. The solution is ideal for organizations of all sizes, including enterprises, service providers, and government agencies.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.