No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Gemalto Protiva [EOL] vs RSA Authentication Manager comparison

Thales and RSA are both solutions in the Authentication Systems category. Additionally, 100% of Thales users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of RSA users who would recommend it.
RSA Authentication Manager
Read 12 RSA Authentication Manager reviews
  • 1,301 Views
  • 1,249 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2025

Gemalto Protiva EOL and RSA Authentication Manager compete in the authentication solutions market. RSA Authentication Manager appears to have the upper hand due to its robust features and comprehensive support.

Features: Gemalto Protiva EOL offers solid multifactor authentication, competitive pricing, and effective support. RSA Authentication Manager provides comprehensive authentication protocols, integration flexibility, and extensive technical support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: RSA Authentication Manager provides a streamlined deployment process with comprehensive guidance and technical support. Gemalto Protiva EOL may require more technical understanding during deployment but has effective support.

Pricing and ROI: Gemalto Protiva EOL typically has a lower setup cost with an appealing short-term ROI. RSA Authentication Manager, with a higher setup cost, can offer better long-term financial returns due to its enhanced capabilities.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Authentication Systems Report (Updated: March 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
March 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 885,667 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Gemalto Protiva [EOL]
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
RSA Authentication Manager
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
8.2
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
Authentication Systems (16th)
 

Featured Reviews

PC
Paul Connaire
RAS Team Lead at Produban USA
A cost-effective solution, but the user interface lacks the ability to customize
In the UK, I think that we are one of the biggest utilizers of the service. With the restrictions that it has, I don't think it's got massive upscalability. For general users it is fine, but the scalability could be better. We started with approximately eight and a half thousand users, and we currently have about twelve-thousand people using it. This is used widely across a number of user groups, including administrators, end users, general users, and specific privileged users for two-factor authentication. We do plan to increase the usage of this solution. Our current capacity is fourteen thousand but we will probably grow beyond that.
Read full review
US
Uwe Schomäcker
VP Business Development at SDVG
Enhancing security with seamless single sign-on and Microsoft integration
We use RSA Authentication Manager for web applications and internal applications. We have a number of applications connected to it, serving over thirty thousand clients. It is integrated into everything from our standard login to Windows in the morning, as well as our applications Due to its…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature for us is the ability to use Active Directory groups as virtual containers instead of domains because it means that we can control our access groups better."
"The most valuable feature for us is the ability to use Active Directory groups as virtual containers instead of domains because it means that we can control our access groups better."
"The Gemalto Protiva suite is really complete as it has smart card managed software, Secure Digital Key, drivers, smart card reader, smart card, OTP readers etc."
"Easy setup, deployment, and integration in different infrastructures, including virtual ones."
"The most valuable feature is the provision part, the mapping and the logging is also very good, and the troubleshooting from a console point of view is easy for administration on the provisioning and logging part."
"The single sign-on feature is the most important."
"RSA Authentication Manager is the best available solution."
"RSA Authentication Manager is a robust solution that provides comprehensive protection for both on-premise and cloud-based applications."
"I have found RSA Authentication Manager to be scalable."
"It stands out as a comprehensive and adaptable solution that excels in both on-premises and cloud-based authentication, offers strong security with multi-layered authentication, and boasts a well-maintained product with reliable performance."
"The product has addressed our remote access security needs while making our work force mobile thus enhancing productivity and customer service initiatives."
More RSA Authentication Manager pros
 

Cons

"The user interface needs improvement. It is not obvious where things are; while the cosmetics are ok, the way it's laid out on the screen could be better."
"The user interface needs improvement."
"The reporting needs to be improved, and they should be delivered by email."
"Our major problem is the authentication via Microsoft, via Microsoft cloud systems."
"We are not planning on using the solution in the future."
"The price needs to be improved."
"There is room for improvement in the RSA support."
"Our major problem is the authentication via Microsoft, via Microsoft cloud systems. This is our major aim, to be a valued product for the future. The biggest problem is to work against cheap cloud systems. Cloud identification is our main problem at this time."
"We are seeing a lot of difficult issues in terms of RSA, especially the cloud-based two-factor authentication process."
"Perhaps parts of the the user interface should become more intuitive."
More RSA Authentication Manager cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is a cost-effective solution compared to some other products out there."
"The solution is costly."
"The pricing is a little bit complicated because sometimes resellers are able to make prices that are too low. Our price, with a discount, is typically not as high as some of our competitors."
"As a new customer, the minimum cost would be four dollars, but you have room for negotiation, potentially bringing it down to as low as three dollars."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
9%
Construction Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Large Enterprise7
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with RSA Authentication Manager?
RSA Authentication Manager is perfect. We do not see current missing products or enhancements yet emphasize the importance of a continuous development roadmap.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for RSA Authentication Manager?
We use RSA Authentication Manager for web applications and internal applications. We have a number of applications connected to it, serving over thirty thousand clients. It is integrated into every...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering RSA Authentication Manager?
RSA Authentication Manager is the best available solution. However, for other companies, it might seem expensive. It's important for RSA to keep developing new features and maintain a robust roadma...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Oracle Identity Governance vs Gemalto Protiva [EOL] Logo
Oracle Identity Governance vs Gemalto Protiva [EOL]
Compared 53% of the time
Symantec Identity Governance and Administration vs Gemalto Protiva [EOL] Logo
Symantec Identity Governance and Administration vs Gemalto Protiva [EOL]
Compared 22% of the time
More Gemalto Protiva [EOL] Competitors
Cisco Duo vs RSA Authentication Manager Logo
Cisco Duo vs RSA Authentication Manager
Compared 9% of the time
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs RSA Authentication Manager Logo
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs RSA Authentication Manager
Compared 9% of the time
Microsoft Entra ID vs RSA Authentication Manager Logo
Microsoft Entra ID vs RSA Authentication Manager
Compared 8% of the time
Yubico YubiKey vs RSA Authentication Manager Logo
Yubico YubiKey vs RSA Authentication Manager
Compared 7% of the time
Fortinet FortiToken vs RSA Authentication Manager Logo
Fortinet FortiToken vs RSA Authentication Manager
Compared 6% of the time
More RSA Authentication Manager Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
March 2026
Gemalto Protiva [EOL] reportDownload Gemalto Protiva [EOL] product report
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
March 2026
RSA Authentication Manager reportDownload RSA Authentication Manager product report
 

Also Known As

Protiva
ACE/Server
 

Overview

Gemalto Protiva [EOL] offered strong identity and access management solutions tailored to enhance enterprise security. It provided authentication and digital protection critical for businesses relying on precise access to sensitive information.

Gemalto Protiva [EOL] was acclaimed for its robust security features, facilitating authentication processes and protecting digital assets from unauthorized access. Designed to cater to businesses seeking heightened security measures, it delivered multifactor authentication options and seamless integration with existing systems. Its use spanned across secure login and transaction services, ensuring that user data remained protected against breaches.

What were the key features offered by Gemalto Protiva [EOL]?
  • Multifactor Authentication: Provided layers of security for user validation.
  • Seamless Integration: Easily connected with existing IT infrastructures.
  • Versatile Deployment: Supported both on-premise and cloud environments.
  • Enhanced Security Tokens: Utilized smart cards and USB tokens for credential security.
  • Comprehensive Access Control: Centrally managed user access to sensitive information.
What benefits or ROI should you consider in reviewing Gemalto Protiva [EOL]?
  • Increased Security: Strengthens defenses against unauthorized data access.
  • Cost Efficiency: Reduces potential financial loss from data breaches.
  • Regulatory Compliance: Aids adherence to industry security standards.
  • User Productivity: Simplifies login processes, saving time and resources.

In healthcare, Gemalto Protiva [EOL] protected patient data and ensured compliance with health regulations. In finance, it secured transactions and user accounts, while in education, it safeguarded academic records and research data, highlighting its versatility across distinct sectors.

Thales
RSA Authentication Manager is the platform behind RSA SecurID that allows for centralized management of the RSA SecurID environment including authentication methods, users, applications, and agents across multiple physical sites. It verifies authentication requests and centrally administers authentication policies for organizations' end users.
RSA
 

Sample Customers

Exostar, Sunrise Health Region, Baker Tilly, Seattle Children's, SEW-Eurodrive
Tiera, Fred Loya, BRE Leasing, ADP, BlueFort Security, New Hanover County
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
March 2026
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: March 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.