No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

FTI Harvester vs IBM StoredIQ comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

FTI Harvester
Ranking in eDiscovery
36th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM StoredIQ
Ranking in eDiscovery
12th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Indexing and Search (13th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the eDiscovery category, the mindshare of FTI Harvester is 1.2%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM StoredIQ is 3.3%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
eDiscovery Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
IBM StoredIQ3.3%
FTI Harvester1.2%
Other95.5%
eDiscovery
 

Featured Reviews

Use FTI Harvester?
Leave a review
GB
Delivery Manager at Gesel
Helps with GDPR compliance through data discovery and management
We knew that we have a lot of scanned docs inside our repositories, but there was a big issue where we needed to know which content was really an image. Because of the OCR made at runtime during the scan, now we know exactly the data we have. When you have zipped documents the scan will unzip them and find the data inside.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which eDiscovery solutions are best for your needs.
911,952 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Canadian Competition Bureau
J.B. Hunt Transport, BBVA Compass
Find out what your peers are saying about Commvault, Microsoft, Google and others in eDiscovery. Updated: August 2026.
911,952 professionals have used our research since 2012.