Frontegg vs Omada Identity comparison

Frontegg and Omada are both solutions in the Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) category. Frontegg is ranked #12, while Omada is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.2. Frontegg holds a 5.2% mindshare in CIaA, compared to Omada’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Frontegg users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Omada users who would recommend it.

Frontegg

Read 6 Frontegg reviews

624 Views
84 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Omada Identity

Read 48 Omada Identity reviews

272 Views
31 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Frontegg

Omada Identity

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 27, 2025

Omada Identity and Frontegg are competitive products in the identity management space. Omada Identity seems to have the upper hand for enterprises with complex IAM needs, while Frontegg is more suited for agile, developer-centric environments due to its scalability and flexibility.

Features: Omada Identity offers detailed access management, robust governance capabilities, and comprehensive security frameworks. Frontegg provides easy integration, customizable authentication services, and developer-friendly interfaces, making it ideal for fast-paced tech environments.

Room for Improvement: Omada Identity could enhance its user interface and streamline deployment processes to reduce dependency on external assistance. It may also benefit from offering more budget-friendly pricing schemes for smaller companies. Frontegg might improve its governance features and expand its security depth to cater to enterprises with more stringent requirements. Additionally, enhancing user management capabilities could expand its appeal to larger organizations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Omada Identity requires extensive deployment planning and often external assistance but offers accommodating customer service. Frontegg supports quicker deployment with an intuitive process and responsive support that boosts developer efficiency, allowing for agile implementations.

Pricing and ROI: Omada Identity involves higher upfront setup costs, designed for large-scale deployments with extensive features and long-term ROI benefits. Frontegg provides a more cost-effective solution with quicker ROI for startups and smaller teams through fast deployment and reduced initial expenses.

To learn more, read our detailed Frontegg vs. Omada Identity Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Frontegg vs. Omada Identity

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,168 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Frontegg

Ranking in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)

12th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (19th), Authentication Systems (34th)

Omada Identity

Ranking in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Provisioning Software (4th), Identity Management (IM) (4th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) category, the mindshare of Frontegg is 5.2%, down from 7.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Omada Identity is 1.6%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)

Featured Reviews

reviewer1645395

Developer at Kovrr

Intuitive with reCaptcha integration and helpful technical support

Frontegg's solution fits us very well, as it removes the extra work of developing, maintaining, storing, and securing all of the user-management platforms. It saves us a lot of time and money every single day. Frontegg allows our organization to focus on what matters - creating meaningful, innovative solutions for our customers without wasting time and energy on problems that were already solved by the industry many, many times before. Without Frontegg, our dev velocity would have been compromised greatly, since we would have to invest in a lot of resources to maintain a properly secured, granular, and flexible user-management framework.

Read full review

Pernilla Hulth

IAM Project Manager (Independent) at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

The interface is easy to use and gives you a solid overview

The cloud-based deployment was straightforward, but the on-prem deployment was in a highly complex ecosystem. Omada has matured since then. I wouldn't say that it isn't straightforward, but it depends on the customer. A standard deployment is relatively easy, but it can be more painful if you need a lot of customization. We deployed the cloud solution in around four months, nearly meeting the 12-week benchmark. The on-prem deployment took three years. It was a highly complex ecosystem that was dependent on other systems. Depending on the size of your environment, you need a product owner and some specialists for maintenance. My last customer was a university with a complex environment. They had around 12 people involved in maintenance at that organization. Typically, it's between 2-5 people.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Every feature is multi-tenant by design, making different customer requests effortless to provide."

"We like the SSO, permissions and roles, multiple workspaces, and react login components."

"The MFA policy via Frontegg allows us to enable/disable/enforce the Multi-Factor Authentication policy of our users and to enhance security and adhere to modern standards."

"Their developers were always willing to meet even though we are in very different time zones."

"The admin portal layer is super useful and saves valuable front-end development time."

"It has Audit Log and many cool features that if we were to develop them by ourselves, it would require a lot of research and development resources. Frontegg gives us everything we need to ensure that our customers have a safe and reliable authentication system in which they can also manage some of the features and roles by themself which gives them more control over their environment."

"I'm not using Omada, but the interface is easy to use and gives you a solid overview of your identities."

"Surveying is a valuable feature because it allows us to import data and see who has access to what data, for example."

"Omada's onboarding features reflect our processes for onboarding new employees well. That is the primary reason we use this solution. We use role-based access control. I'm not sure how much it has improved our security posture, but it's made managing identities more convenient."

"The most valuable aspects of Omada Identity for me are the automation capabilities."

"Its best feature is definitely the process design. It is quite easy and straightforward to design a process."

"The most appealing aspect of Omada Identity is its self-service upgrade system."

"Support-wise, working with Omada has been good. We have very good direct interactions and fast responses."

"Two valuable features of Omada Identity are the ability to discover accounts and link them to identities, and the automatic disabling of inactive accounts or identities."

More Omada Identity pros

Cons

"The PHP SDK is limited. It's not a huge deal as we can just use their web API directly, but it is something to note if you're using PHP.‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎"

"The web interface is missing a way to delete a workspace. I have accidentally created a workspace and was not able to delete it. It's a minor thing that should be supported."

"We're hoping to see more user management-related features, according to Frontegg's roadmap."

"Frontegg is fairly stable, however, we are looking forward to some promised capabilities, such as more tightly integrated Feature Flag support."

"We really like the ability to add the same user across tenants. From a UX perspective, the flow can be betterized."

"It would be nice to have a backup export with all tenant/users so that in case of a mistake we can have the option to restore the users."

"The architecture of the entire system should also be less complex. The way they process the data is complex."

"The Omada support response time has room for improvement."

"In our organization, all the data is event-driven, which means that if an attribute is changed in the source system, it can be updated within a few seconds in all end-user systems. There is room for improvement in Omada regarding that. Omada is still batch-based for some processes, so sometimes it can take an hour or even four hours before the execution is run and the update is sent."

"Omada Identity has two main issues that need to be solved or improved the most. One is its setup or installation process because it's complex and cumbersome. I'm talking about the process for on-premises deployment because I've never tried the cloud version of Omada Identity. Setting up the cloud version should be much easier. The second area for improvement in Omada Identity is that it's piggybacking on Microsoft's complex way of having all kinds of add-ons, extensions, or setups, whether small or large, such as the new SQL Server, and it's cumbersome to make sure that everything works. Omada Identity is a complex solution and could still be improved."

"If I had to name one thing, it would be the user interface (UI)."

"Omada Identity's user interface needs improvement, especially for new users."

"The reporting on the warehouse data and the import process both have room for improvement."

"The user interface could be improved. The interface between Omada and the user is mainly text-based."

More Omada Identity cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Omada continues to be very competitive on pricing, especially on the Omada cloud product."

"It is expensive. Fortunately, I had a very good procurement manager on my side, but they are expensive. The closest competitors are also very expensive. You get a full-fledged solution that can do everything you dream of, but you pay for everything."

"Omada is too expensive. We are in the automotive industry. The pricing might be high because most of the other customers are in the insurance or banking sectors, but it's steep for an auto supply company."

"Omada Identity offers a reasonable price point, but it will increase as we transition to the cloud."

"Omada Identity is very reasonably and competitively priced."

"The pricing is okay."

"It is not cheap. It is expensive, but compared to what we did almost three years ago, it is value for money. It is worth it."

"It is licensed per managed user per year."

More Omada Identity pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

Government

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Omada Identity Cloud?

As an administrator, we benefit from a lot of functionality that is available out of the box, but it is also configurable to meet our specific needs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Omada Identity Cloud?

They are positioned at a good price point. They are lower than some of their competitors.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Omada Identity Cloud?

The biggest issue, which is the reason why we are transitioning from their product to SailPoint, is the overall user experience. From a technical perspective, it is a very good product, but from an...

See all answers

Comparisons

Auth0 vs Frontegg

Compared 59% of the time

WorkOS vs Frontegg

Compared 18% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Frontegg

Compared 11% of the time

Descope vs Frontegg

Compared 11% of the time

More Frontegg Competitors

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Omada Identity

Compared 30% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Omada Identity

Compared 20% of the time

Saviynt vs Omada Identity

Compared 17% of the time

One Identity Manager vs Omada Identity

Compared 8% of the time

Ping Identity Platform vs Omada Identity

Compared 5% of the time

More Omada Identity Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

May 2025

Download Frontegg product report

Buyer's Guide

Omada Identity

June 2025

Download Omada Identity product report

Also Known As

No data available

Omada Identity Suite, Omada Identity Cloud

Overview

Frontegg is a user management platform, designed for the Product-Led Growth (PLG) era. Frontegg provides blazing-fast integration of a powerful user infrastructure, designed to handle modern application use-cases.

Our platform supports app builders by covering all the way from fundamental authentication flows to the most advanced capabilities such as complex organizational structures (multi-tenancy), fine-grained authorization, API-token management, self-service admin portal for end-users, subscription enforcement, single-sign-on (SSO), and much more.

Frontegg’s interfaces are embedded as a UI layer within your app and becomes a customer-facing management interface for your end-users, both on the personal and workspace levels. Frontegg also powers-up your backend through rich SDKs supported in various languages and frameworks.

Pricing: Starts at $249/m

Frontegg

Omada Identity is an identity governance and administration (IGA) solution designed to help organizations manage and secure digital identities and access across their IT environments. It focuses on enhancing security, compliance, and efficiency by automating identity management processes.

Omada Identity offers a robust set of features that streamline identity lifecycle management, access governance, and compliance reporting. It integrates with a wide range of IT systems, applications, and data sources, providing a centralized platform for managing user identities and access rights. The solution enables organizations to enforce security policies, ensure regulatory compliance, and reduce the risk of unauthorized access.

What are the critical features of Omada Identity?

Identity Lifecycle Management: Automates the process of creating, updating, and deactivating user identities throughout their lifecycle.
Access Governance: Ensures that users have appropriate access rights, enabling continuous monitoring and recertification of access.
Compliance Reporting: Provides comprehensive reporting capabilities to demonstrate compliance with regulatory requirements.
Role-Based Access Control (RBAC): Simplifies the assignment and management of access rights based on user roles within the organization.
Self-Service Access Requests: Empowers users to request access to resources through a user-friendly portal, reducing administrative burden.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with various systems, applications, and data sources for unified identity and access management.

What benefits or ROI items should users look for in the reviews when evaluating Omada Identity?

Improved Security: By ensuring that only authorized users have access to sensitive information, Omada Identity enhances overall security posture.
Regulatory Compliance: Helps organizations meet compliance requirements by providing detailed audit trails and reporting features.
Operational Efficiency: Automates routine identity management tasks, reducing manual effort and freeing up IT resources for strategic initiatives.
User Productivity: Streamlines access management processes, enabling users to quickly obtain the resources they need to perform their jobs.
Reduced Risk: Minimizes the risk of data breaches and insider threats by enforcing strict access controls and continuous monitoring.

Omada Identity is widely adopted across various industries, including healthcare, finance, and manufacturing. In healthcare, it helps protect patient data and comply with regulations like HIPAA. In finance, it ensures compliance with SOX and other financial regulations. In manufacturing, it secures access to sensitive production data and intellectual property.

Pricing and licensing for Omada Identity are typically based on the number of users and the specific features required. Customer support is available through various channels, including online resources, support tickets, and professional services for implementation and customization.

In summary, Omada Identity is a comprehensive IGA solution that enhances security, compliance, and efficiency in managing digital identities and access.

Omada

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Bayer, ECCO Shoes, Vattenfall, NuStar Energy, Unicredit, Schiphol Group, BMW Group, Deutsche Leasing

Buyer's Guide

Frontegg vs. Omada Identity

June 2025

Free Report: Frontegg vs. Omada Identity

Find out what your peers are saying about Frontegg vs. Omada Identity and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Frontegg vs. Omada Identity report.

See our list of best Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) vendors.

We monitor all Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.