Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Qt Squish vs froglogic Coco Code Coverage comparison

The compared froglogic Coco Code Coverage and Qt Squish solutions aren't in the same category. froglogic Coco Code Coverage is ranked #7 in D , and holds a 4.5% mindshare in the category. Qt Squish is ranked #9 in TAt , with an average rating of 8.5, and holds a 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of froglogic Coco Code Coverage users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Qt Squish users who would recommend it.
froglogic Coco Code Coverage
Read 1 froglogic Coco Code Coverage review
  • 142 Views
  • 34 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Qt Squish
Read 20 Qt Squish reviews
  • 2,500 Views
  • 1,290 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

froglogic Coco Code Coverage
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Debugging (7th)
Qt Squish
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
Test Automation Tools (9th)
 

Mindshare comparison

froglogic Coco Code Coverage and Qt Squish aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. froglogic Coco Code Coverage is designed for Debugging and holds a mindshare of 4.5%, up 3.3% compared to last year.
Qt Squish, on the other hand, focuses on Test Automation Tools, holds 3.0% mindshare, up 2.7% since last year.
Debugging
Test Automation Tools
 

Featured Reviews

AnirbanSarkar - PeerSpot reviewer
Integrates well, highly scalable, but more programming langue support needed
If someone is already using Squish as a regression tool, froglogic Coco Code Coverage can be a very handy add-on to that. If somebody is already having some mechanism to write their unit test cases, froglogic Coco Code Coverage can be a very good tool for giving the code coverage. The solution overall is still in development, they need to polish a few things moving forward. I rate froglogic Coco Code Coverage a seven out of ten.
Read full review
Luc Vangrunderbeeck - PeerSpot reviewer
Testing solution supports Java testing with good reliability
There is nothing you can do for almost every application. If you do it for a single version, it is rather easy. However, if you want to run it for different versions of the software, then you need the Qt version of Java. You need to set up some special environment variables to be able to do that.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"If somebody is using a kind of Squish as a regression testing tool, froglogic Coco Code Coverage can be used in parallel because these two particular products can communicate with one another."
"I find it very user-friendly and easy to start working with. The main benefit for me is that it allows testing applications developed in the Qt language. This capability makes Squish a game-changer, as it's the only tool I've found that enables automation for applications written in Qt. I appreciate three main aspects. Firstly, the documentation is excellent. Secondly, I value the way the tool efficiently locates elements during testing. These are the two aspects I particularly like."
"The initial setup process is straightforward."
"I can perform Java SWT."
"Squish is integrated with Qt, which enables us to test the user interface effectively."
"froglogic Squish is one of the most desired solutions if you are having a Qt as a framework and if you are looking at GUI regression testing. froglogic is a part of Qt as a company."
"I like the dashboard. It's virtual, and you can see the customer results. I can do it at night and in the morning. I think it also automatically emails results."
"It is very stable."
"This product can work with QT applications and cross-cut from them on Windows or Mac."
 

Cons

"froglogic Coco Code Coverage could improve by adding more computer programing language, it would be better. It only covers four languages."
"Support isn't always helpful. I sometimes need to find solutions myself."
"ID could be improved with suggestions of names, variables or class."
"We encountered issues with the embedded environment and building for the Qt version."
"The platform could be improved by implementing some basic functionalities that are frequently used, such as login procedures and screen handling when multiple screens are used at the workplace."
"There had been a lot of improvements with froglogic Squish already. There were some scenarios in which this particular solution was available in different flavors. They have pulled everything together in one solution. There were some monitoring systems, which were missing out from the solution earlier. They have a centralized dashboard for monitoring the test cases and their execution. It's a full-blown solution, there are not many glitches in terms of something missing out of the package."
"You need to set up some special environment variables."
"The price could be better."
"I'm relatively new to Squish, so I'm not familiar with all its pros and cons. Currently, I haven't identified any specific improvements. However, one feature I miss is Git integration within the tool. In my previous experience with Selenium and Python in PyCharm, it was straightforward to create and review changes before pushing them. I haven't found a similar option in Squish, and having an integrated tool for managing conflicts would be beneficial in certain scenarios where collaboration is involved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"It is expensive."
"The platform is highly-priced."
"The price could be better. I believe each developer license costs about 6000 or 7000 Euros per year."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Debugging solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
850,671 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
21%
Computer Software Company
16%
Healthcare Company
8%
Transportation Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for froglogic Squish?
I'm aware of the price from three or four years ago, and it depends on the number of users. For the developer license, it is about $5200 a year.
See all answers
What needs improvement with froglogic Squish?
There is nothing you can do for almost every application. If you do it for a single version, it is rather easy. However, if you want to run it for different versions of the software, then you need ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for froglogic Squish?
I am not really using the solution during development, however, for regression and automatic regression tests, I am using it. I use it to do visual Qt, which focuses on the GUI part of the applicat...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
Ranorex Studio vs Qt Squish Logo
Ranorex Studio vs Qt Squish
Compared 22% of the time
SmartBear TestComplete vs Qt Squish Logo
SmartBear TestComplete vs Qt Squish
Compared 17% of the time
Eggplant Test vs Qt Squish Logo
Eggplant Test vs Qt Squish
Compared 10% of the time
Katalon Studio vs Qt Squish Logo
Katalon Studio vs Qt Squish
Compared 10% of the time
Tricentis Tosca vs Qt Squish Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs Qt Squish
Compared 9% of the time
More Qt Squish Competitors
 

Product Reports

No data available
Buyer's Guide
Qt Squish
April 2025
Qt Squish reportDownload Qt Squish product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
froglogic Squish
 

Overview

The Coco code coverage tool is a complete, cross-platform, cross-compiler tool chain allowing to analyze the test coverage of C, C++, C# and Tcl code.

Coco is used to

  • Find and highlight untested code sections
  • Find redundant tests (i.e., tests that merely duplicate others)
  • Find unreachable code
  • Compute the optimal order of test execution that will maximize the overall coverage
  • Compare the test coverage of two application versions or test executions.
Qt Group

Take the complexity out of testing graphical user interfaces (GUIs) and human-machine interfaces (HMIs) – even in the face of product evolution and safety-critical applications.

Qt Group
 

Sample Customers

Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson
Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson

We monitor all Debugging reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.