• Home
  • FrameMaker vs. StreamServe [EOL]

FrameMaker vs StreamServe [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Adobe Logo
FrameMaker
Read 2 FrameMaker reviews
257 views|166 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo
StreamServe [EOL]
views| comparisons
Buyer's Guide
Adobe Captivate vs. FrameMaker
May 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between FrameMaker and StreamServe [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Adobe, QuarkXPress, PTC and others in Publishing Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Adobe Captivate vs. FrameMaker Report (Updated: May 2024).
Download the complete report
769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
The valuable features for us are format control and professional and clear output.
At the very beginning, we used to copy and edit source files for different versions of our software. Now we maintain only one source file for... Read more →
Use StreamServe [EOL]?
Ranking
1st
out of 7 in Publishing Software
Views
257
Comparisons
166
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Publishing Software
Buyer's Guide
Adobe Captivate vs. FrameMaker
May 2024
Free Report: Adobe Captivate vs. FrameMaker
Find out what your peers are saying about Adobe Captivate vs. FrameMaker and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Adobe
OpenText
Overview
Adobe FrameMaker is a complete solution for bidirectional technical content. Publish natively across channels, mobile devices and formats and author with best-in-class XML/DITA support. Collaborate seamlessly with experts, and manage content using integration with leading CMSs.
OpenText Communications Center Enterprise (CCE) provides a single platform for the enterprise-wide design, deployment and multi-channel delivery of documents and correspondence, whether digital or conventional, in batch or on-demand, including interactive correspondence to turn documents into dialogues.
Sample Customers
HaCon Ingenieurgesellschaft, ANA (All Nippon Airways Co. Ltd.), IBM, Marcia Riefer Johnston, Novell, AFNOR Publishing
KPN
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company20%
Manufacturing Company15%
Government10%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company8%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business31%
Midsize Enterprise5%
Large Enterprise65%
No Data Available

FrameMaker is ranked 1st in Publishing Software while StreamServe [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Publishing Software. FrameMaker is rated 8.0, while StreamServe [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of FrameMaker writes "The valuable features for us are format control and professional and clear output. ". On the other hand, FrameMaker is most compared with PTC Arbortext, Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms, QuarkXPress and Adobe Captivate, whereas StreamServe [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Publishing Software vendors.

We monitor all Publishing Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.