Fortra's Intermapper vs SolarWinds Network Automation Manager comparison

Fortra and SolarWinds are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Fortra is ranked #80, while SolarWinds is ranked #92. Fortra holds a 0.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to SolarWinds’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Fortra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of SolarWinds users who would recommend it.

Fortra's Intermapper

Read 4 Fortra's Intermapper reviews

1,573 Views
1,510 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SolarWinds Network Automati...

Read 2 SolarWinds Network Automation Manager reviews

1,673 Views
1,087 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Fortra's Intermapper

SolarWinds Network Automati...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Fortra's Intermapper and SolarWinds Network Automation Manager compete in network management and automation. SolarWinds is seen as having the upper hand due to its extensive feature set, providing better long-term ROI despite higher costs.

Features: Fortra's Intermapper provides real-time network mapping, comprehensive visualization tools, and quick diagnostics, ideal for easier network analysis. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager offers robust automation capabilities, extensive monitoring, and configuration management, supporting complex network environments with broader features.

Room for Improvement: Fortra's Intermapper could enhance its automation features, extend its monitoring capabilities, and integrate better with third-party tools. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager may improve its setup complexity, reduce overall cost, and simplify its user interface for easier navigation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fortra's Intermapper is favored for its simple setup process and reliable customer support, beneficial for smaller teams. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager, although initially complex to set up, offers extensive resources and assistance, valuable for larger-scale operations.

Pricing and ROI: Fortra's Intermapper attracts cost-conscious buyers with its lower setup cost and favorable ROI for smaller to mid-sized businesses. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager requires a higher upfront investment but promises superior long-term ROI through automation and efficiency improvements.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortra's Intermapper vs. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Fortra's Intermapper vs. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortra's Intermapper

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

80th

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SolarWinds Network Automati...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

92nd

Average Rating

5.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Automation (16th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Fortra's Intermapper is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SolarWinds Network Automation Manager is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Fortra's Intermapper	0.5%
SolarWinds Network Automation Manager	0.4%
Other	99.1%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Andrian Lubimov

SVP of Networking and Operations at Skywire Networks

It tremendously cuts down our troubleshooting timeframe, but needs advanced SLA monitoring and reporting

They can do a better job with SLA reporting. It does some basic reporting, but it really doesn't offer the ability to monitor devices by groups, customers, or carrier to give an overall health performance of specifically-defined environments. That's where HelpSystems Intermapper could have done a better job. I would love to see advanced SLA monitoring and reporting in this solution. They already have a lot of ingredients. They already have SNMP polling. It is really about what people are looking for from SLA monitoring, especially someone who looks at the network topology. You want to see your endpoints. You want to see half of your endpoints by simply analyzing ICMP or SNMP-based availability of your endpoints. Having an ability to define your group and how you bring devices into your group would be a huge benefit.

Read full review

Giulio Valeri

Owner at SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS SRL

Threat detection failures, poor technical support, and expensive

We use the solution to manage all of our customer's systems. We monitor and decide if everything is okay and if not, we do changes when needed. For example, if there is a need to change the antivirus software we can automate the process and install the new one. There are scripts within the software…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's a nice graphical interface, a nice map, that relates Layer 1 to Layer 3, virtually instantly, to the Helpdesk support staff. It provides a default place to get critical information so we can deploy our staff."

"The solution has a couple of features which are really interesting; it's not a fancy or expensive solution but we wanted to have a cost effective one and it's doing its job pretty well."

"Put Intermapper in as your base to start from, hands-down."

"It's all today portal-based which is a good feature for us."

"The graphical alerting with the ability to obtain a quick overview of a monitored device is my favorite feature."

"What is really cool about HelpSystems InterMapper is that because of its SNMP base, you can integrate all different makes and models on the same map. You, of course, can have more than one map, but you have an option to have visibility into the entire network from one centralized system. You can monitor IPs, routers, radios, DC power plants, and UPS. You can do it all from one network management and monitoring solution. That's what really makes HelpSystems Intermapper great. Another great thing about HelpSystems InterMapper is that you can really bundle different probes under one device. You can have a bundled device. You can monitor the physical status of a host based on the IP availability. You can also monitor services and actually see if anything happens. You can quickly determine whether it is the application layer, host layer, or network layer. HelpSystems Intermapper gives such a unique representation of a network. Ever since we started using HelpSystems InterMapper, we don't have to document everything in a detailed format and store it somewhere. Right now, it is really a combination of network topology, network monitoring, and network analyzing. So, in my opinion, it is awesome. When you have your SNMP topology defined, you don't require a dedicated NMS engineer to manage your system, which is another great thing about HelpSystems InterMapper. I see how our operators get so excited by having the ability to map a device or interface and connect interfaces together. HelpSystems InterMapper is also very operator friendly; not just user friendly, but also operator friendly. This is a unique feature, and it works really great."

"The most valuable features are its: log history, real-time monitoring capabilities, accuracy - the number of false positives is very low, and the mapping features."

"Right now, it is really a combination of network topology, network monitoring, and network analyzing, so, in my opinion, it is awesome."

"We are satisfied with the stability of the solution."

"The solution offers so many great resources, it makes them a powerhouse in the market."

"The installation is easy."

Cons

"They can do a better job with SLA reporting. It does some basic reporting, but it really doesn't offer the ability to monitor devices by groups, customers, or carrier to give an overall health performance of specifically-defined environments. That's where HelpSystems Intermapper could have done a better job. I would love to see advanced SLA monitoring and reporting in this solution. They already have a lot of ingredients. They already have SNMP polling. It is really about what people are looking for from SLA monitoring, especially someone who looks at the network topology. You want to see your endpoints. You want to see half of your endpoints by simply analyzing ICMP or SNMP-based availability of your endpoints. Having an ability to define your group and how you bring devices into your group would be a huge benefit."

"It's a smaller solution so tools are not as advanced as you would find in a larger solution"

"I have seen instances where Intermapper does not seem to recover from network changes."

"I'd love to see more of the network management side of it coming back into it."

"I'd love to see more of the network management side of it coming back into it. If we were able to run scripts to bounce ports on switches, that would be great. It's asking a lot, but it's actually very doable because I do it through scripting into other products. If we could incorporate that directly into Intermapper, that would be fantastic."

"We now use ConnectWise because while using SolarWinds we were attacked by ransomware. The solution did not protect us."

"The price could be a bit lower."

"We did not like SolarWinds because it was not able to communicate between UPSA and our accounting system. They should have better integration."

"The price could be a bit lower."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The price of SolarWinds Network Automation Manager is fair. However, it is more expensive than ConnectWise."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

17%

Construction Company

11%

University

Comms Service Provider

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Performing Arts

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Comparisons

SolarWinds VoIP & Network Quality Manager vs Fortra's Intermapper

Compared 19% of the time

ConnectWise RMM vs Fortra's Intermapper

Compared 14% of the time

Nmap vs Fortra's Intermapper

Compared 11% of the time

Zabbix vs Fortra's Intermapper

Compared 8% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Fortra's Intermapper

Compared 6% of the time

More Fortra's Intermapper Competitors

NetBrain vs SolarWinds Network Automation Manager

Compared 26% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs SolarWinds Network Automation Manager

Compared 11% of the time

Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) vs SolarWinds Network Automation Manager

Compared 11% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs SolarWinds Network Automation Manager

Compared 8% of the time

SCOM vs SolarWinds Network Automation Manager

Compared 7% of the time

More SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

April 2026

Download Fortra's Intermapper product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Automation

May 2026

SolarWinds Network Automation Manager report

Download SolarWinds Network Automation Manager product report

Also Known As

HelpSystems Intermapper

SolarWinds NAM

Overview

Fortra's Intermapper offers real-time network mapping and monitoring, ideal for IT teams seeking a reliable visualization and alerting tool to maintain uptime and connectivity.

Ideal for IT environments, Fortra's Intermapper provides dynamic and intuitive network mapping capabilities. Known for its ability to display an up-to-date graphical view of IT infrastructure, this solution enables proactive monitoring through instant alerts and performance insights. It helps IT teams swiftly address potential issues, ensuring consistent connectivity and performance.

What are the key features of Fortra's Intermapper?

Real-Time Network Mapping: Displays live network status for immediate infrastructure insight.
Customizable Alerts: Allows personalized notifications for targeted problem-solving.
Performance Monitoring: Tracks metrics to preemptively identify potential disruptions.
Cross-Platform Compatibility: Supports different operating systems for wider usability.
Historical Data Maintenance: Retains past network data for trend analysis and reporting.

Which benefits or ROI can users expect from Fortra's Intermapper?

Improved Network Visibility: Enhances understanding of network status and layout.
Faster Issue Resolution: Real-time alerts and monitoring minimize downtime.
Cost Efficiency: By reducing outages, operational costs decrease significantly.
Enhanced User Experience: Stable networks boost overall end-user satisfaction.

In industries such as healthcare, finance, and education, Fortra's Intermapper is a vital tool for maintaining high network performance and reliability. It plays a crucial role in environments where uptime is critical, ensuring that network issues are resolved swiftly to support essential operations.

Fortra

SolarWinds Network Automation Manager is a comprehensive tool designed to streamline network management and automation, helping IT teams enhance efficiency and reliability in network operations.

SolarWinds Network Automation Manager offers a detailed interface for overseeing network assets, vastly improving operational efficiency. It ensures seamless integration with existing infrastructure and automates routine tasks, reducing manual errors and increasing administrative control. This tool provides network administrators with a robust platform to manage configurations, performance metrics, and security protocols, enabling them to focus on strategic tasks.

What are the key features of SolarWinds Network Automation Manager?

Configuration Management: Automates tracking and installation of network device configurations, simplifying updates and audits.
Network Performance Monitoring: Offers real-time visibility into network health, ensuring operational continuity.
IP Address Management: Efficiently handles IP address provisioning and documentation to prevent conflicts.
Network Traffic Analysis: Provides insights into bandwidth usage and traffic patterns for better resource management.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Increased Productivity: Frees IT staff from repetitive tasks, allowing focus on strategic initiatives.
Cost Reduction: Minimizes downtime and maintenance costs through efficient issue detection and troubleshooting.
Improved Security: Enhances network safety with automated compliance checks and vulnerability management.
Scalability: Supports growth with flexible architecture to accommodate expanding network requirements.

Industries including finance, healthcare, and education utilize SolarWinds Network Automation Manager to meet specific needs like regulatory compliance, operational continuity, and cost efficiency. By automating complex processes, organizations can maintain high-performance networks, adapt quickly to industry challenges, and optimize resource allocation.

SolarWinds

Sample Customers

Greater Media Detroit, University of British Columbia, Don's Farm Supply

Maalem Financing Company, School City of Hammond

Buyer's Guide

Fortra's Intermapper vs. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager

April 2026

Free Report: Fortra's Intermapper vs. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortra's Intermapper vs. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fortra's Intermapper vs. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.