Fortra's Intermapper vs Opsview comparison

Fortra and ITRS are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Fortra is ranked #80, while ITRS is ranked #44 with an average rating of 8.0. Fortra holds a 0.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to ITRS’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Fortra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ITRS users who would recommend it.

Fortra's Intermapper

Read 4 Fortra's Intermapper reviews

2,040 Views
1,958 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Opsview

Read 25 Opsview reviews

5,615 Views
3,874 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fortra's Intermapper

Opsview

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Opsview and Fortra's Intermapper are competing in the network monitoring space. Opsview seems to have the upper hand with its comprehensive monitoring capabilities, while Intermapper is preferred for its ease of deployment and intuitive interface.

Features: Opsview offers extensive monitoring capabilities, customizable dashboards, and advanced automation features. Fortra's Intermapper focuses on real-time network mapping, intuitive drag-and-drop map designs, and immediate insights into network performance.

Room for Improvement: Opsview could improve its deployment complexity, enhance user interface intuitiveness, and offer simpler setup processes. Intermapper can expand its monitoring capabilities, provide more customization options, and increase advanced automation features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Opsview's deployment can be more complex, requiring skilled administrators, but it provides comprehensive support options. Intermapper is designed for quick and straightforward deployment, minimizing setup time and offering standard customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Opsview's initial setup costs can be higher due to its sophisticated infrastructure, yet it promises significant ROI through its deep insights and automation. Fortra's Intermapper typically has lower upfront costs and delivers satisfactory ROI with rapid setup and reduced operational overhead.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortra's Intermapper vs. Opsview Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Fortra's Intermapper vs. Opsview

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 910,005 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortra's Intermapper

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

80th

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Opsview

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

44th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (21st), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (33rd), Cloud Monitoring Software (24th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Fortra's Intermapper is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Opsview is 1.0%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Opsview	1.0%
Fortra's Intermapper	0.5%
Other	98.5%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Andrian Lubimov

SVP of Networking and Operations at Skywire Networks

It tremendously cuts down our troubleshooting timeframe, but needs advanced SLA monitoring and reporting

They can do a better job with SLA reporting. It does some basic reporting, but it really doesn't offer the ability to monitor devices by groups, customers, or carrier to give an overall health performance of specifically-defined environments. That's where HelpSystems Intermapper could have done a better job. I would love to see advanced SLA monitoring and reporting in this solution. They already have a lot of ingredients. They already have SNMP polling. It is really about what people are looking for from SLA monitoring, especially someone who looks at the network topology. You want to see your endpoints. You want to see half of your endpoints by simply analyzing ICMP or SNMP-based availability of your endpoints. Having an ability to define your group and how you bring devices into your group would be a huge benefit.

Read full review

reviewer1898607

Partner Technical Support & Escalation Manager at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

Real-time dashboards have improved our deployment monitoring and incident response

We are using Opsview ourselves, rather than being a consultant or a reseller. We do not use its auto-discovery feature. We do not utilize its API driven architecture. I do not know what metrics we use to assess the effectiveness of Opsview's hybrid IT monitoring. Overall, I am pretty satisfied with Opsview as it is good for what it does. I do not know if Grafana has any other advantages besides better stats, as I am not involved in that side. Based on my experience, I would still recommend Opsview to others as it is good for what it does. I gave this review a rating of 8.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution has a couple of features which are really interesting; it's not a fancy or expensive solution but we wanted to have a cost effective one and it's doing its job pretty well."

"Right now, it is really a combination of network topology, network monitoring, and network analyzing, so, in my opinion, it is awesome."

"What is really cool about HelpSystems InterMapper is that because of its SNMP base, you can integrate all different makes and models on the same map. You, of course, can have more than one map, but you have an option to have visibility into the entire network from one centralized system. You can monitor IPs, routers, radios, DC power plants, and UPS. You can do it all from one network management and monitoring solution. That's what really makes HelpSystems Intermapper great. Another great thing about HelpSystems InterMapper is that you can really bundle different probes under one device. You can have a bundled device. You can monitor the physical status of a host based on the IP availability. You can also monitor services and actually see if anything happens. You can quickly determine whether it is the application layer, host layer, or network layer. HelpSystems Intermapper gives such a unique representation of a network. Ever since we started using HelpSystems InterMapper, we don't have to document everything in a detailed format and store it somewhere. Right now, it is really a combination of network topology, network monitoring, and network analyzing. So, in my opinion, it is awesome. When you have your SNMP topology defined, you don't require a dedicated NMS engineer to manage your system, which is another great thing about HelpSystems InterMapper. I see how our operators get so excited by having the ability to map a device or interface and connect interfaces together. HelpSystems InterMapper is also very operator friendly; not just user friendly, but also operator friendly. This is a unique feature, and it works really great."

"It's a nice graphical interface, a nice map, that relates Layer 1 to Layer 3, virtually instantly, to the Helpdesk support staff. It provides a default place to get critical information so we can deploy our staff."

"It's all today portal-based which is a good feature for us."

"The most valuable features are its: log history, real-time monitoring capabilities, accuracy - the number of false positives is very low, and the mapping features."

"The graphical alerting with the ability to obtain a quick overview of a monitored device is my favorite feature."

"Put Intermapper in as your base to start from, hands-down."

"Over the past three years, we've grown by about 200%, and the system has been able to manage that growth."

"I am satisfied with the overall product since it works well…It is a stable solution."

"We now have a single view for all systems monitored within our IT estate, while we previously had three different systems (each configured differently)."

"It's a good solution. It covers all aspects of monitoring purposes."

"We use this solution for internal monitoring our own cloud platform because we are a public cloud provider, and we also use it for monitoring purposes on behalf of our clients."

"Customer service is great; always responsive, within minutes at times."

"The multi-tenancy that's available through this is one of the most valuable things."

"The dashboards are the real value add for this product in my opinion and enhance customer experience if done properly."

More Opsview pros

Cons

"They can do a better job with SLA reporting. It does some basic reporting, but it really doesn't offer the ability to monitor devices by groups, customers, or carrier to give an overall health performance of specifically-defined environments. That's where HelpSystems Intermapper could have done a better job. I would love to see advanced SLA monitoring and reporting in this solution. They already have a lot of ingredients. They already have SNMP polling. It is really about what people are looking for from SLA monitoring, especially someone who looks at the network topology. You want to see your endpoints. You want to see half of your endpoints by simply analyzing ICMP or SNMP-based availability of your endpoints. Having an ability to define your group and how you bring devices into your group would be a huge benefit."

"I'd love to see more of the network management side of it coming back into it."

"I'd love to see more of the network management side of it coming back into it. If we were able to run scripts to bounce ports on switches, that would be great. It's asking a lot, but it's actually very doable because I do it through scripting into other products. If we could incorporate that directly into Intermapper, that would be fantastic."

"It's a smaller solution so tools are not as advanced as you would find in a larger solution"

"I have seen instances where Intermapper does not seem to recover from network changes."

"We have had some stability issues, but that is largely because we're using an unsupported database."

"In a future release, we would like to have Observ for AI. Any AI and intelligence it can add to the monitoring is obviously beneficial. We would also like to have automated callouts."

"We are starting to hit the limits of how we can scale out."

"Sometimes Opsview has crashed, but the multiple master/slave solution provides consistent uptime for monitoring."

"Often the webpage becomes inaccessible and you need to refresh the page."

"Maybe the graphical representation can be improved. It can be enhanced for better visualization. It could be a little better. And the graph center can be improved."

"Hard to say, some minor changes could help improve ease of configuring (which have already been requested and are now on the roadmap)."

"In Opsview 4.6.3, there is no provision for making bulk changes to monitored servers via the GUI, though it is possible to custom-script bulk changes via the API."

More Opsview cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The solution is priced similarly to other tools offering similar features."

"I would rate pricing a seven out of ten, where ten is the highest price."

"The solution is not cheap. I think that the pricing is a little bit on the high side."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

910,005 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

12%

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with Opsview Monitor?

There is always room for improvement, and part of the reason we're looking at Grafana is because there are things it can do that Opsview cannot do as well. Grafana does have features that I think m...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Opsview Monitor?

Our primary use case is monitoring our deployments.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Opsview Monitor?

See all answers

Comparisons

SolarWinds VoIP & Network Quality Manager vs Fortra's Intermapper

Compared 15% of the time

ConnectWise RMM vs Fortra's Intermapper

Compared 10% of the time

Nmap vs Fortra's Intermapper

Compared 9% of the time

Zabbix vs Fortra's Intermapper

Compared 9% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Fortra's Intermapper

Compared 7% of the time

More Fortra's Intermapper Competitors

Nagios XI vs Opsview

Compared 10% of the time

LogicMonitor vs Opsview

Compared 7% of the time

Datadog vs Opsview

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Opsview

Compared 6% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Opsview

Compared 6% of the time

More Opsview Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

August 2026

Download Fortra's Intermapper product report

Buyer's Guide

Opsview

August 2026

Download Opsview product report

Also Known As

HelpSystems Intermapper

Opsview Monitor, Opsview Enterprise

Overview

Fortra's Intermapper offers real-time network mapping and monitoring, ideal for IT teams seeking a reliable visualization and alerting tool to maintain uptime and connectivity.

Ideal for IT environments, Fortra's Intermapper provides dynamic and intuitive network mapping capabilities. Known for its ability to display an up-to-date graphical view of IT infrastructure, this solution enables proactive monitoring through instant alerts and performance insights. It helps IT teams swiftly address potential issues, ensuring consistent connectivity and performance.

What are the key features of Fortra's Intermapper?

Real-Time Network Mapping: Displays live network status for immediate infrastructure insight.
Customizable Alerts: Allows personalized notifications for targeted problem-solving.
Performance Monitoring: Tracks metrics to preemptively identify potential disruptions.
Cross-Platform Compatibility: Supports different operating systems for wider usability.
Historical Data Maintenance: Retains past network data for trend analysis and reporting.

Which benefits or ROI can users expect from Fortra's Intermapper?

Improved Network Visibility: Enhances understanding of network status and layout.
Faster Issue Resolution: Real-time alerts and monitoring minimize downtime.
Cost Efficiency: By reducing outages, operational costs decrease significantly.
Enhanced User Experience: Stable networks boost overall end-user satisfaction.

In industries such as healthcare, finance, and education, Fortra's Intermapper is a vital tool for maintaining high network performance and reliability. It plays a crucial role in environments where uptime is critical, ensuring that network issues are resolved swiftly to support essential operations.

Fortra

Opsview provides advanced monitoring for system availability, service metrics, and resource usage with flexibility and scalability tailored for global networks.

Opsview delivers comprehensive monitoring through its flexible alert framework, web GUI, and integration with Nagios plugins. It facilitates seamless server additions, supports multi-tenancy, and offers scalability with a MySQL backend. Configuring new hosts and services is straightforward, while advanced services like cloning and alert noise reduction enhance user experience. Users mention room for improvement in the API, database support, and features like bulk changes in the GUI. Despite these aspects, Opsview is preferred for cloud and client monitoring across multiple geographical points.

What are Opsview's most important features?

Flexible Alert Framework: Allows customized alerting rules to suit diverse needs.
Web GUI and Dashboard: Intuitive interfaces for real-time monitoring and data visualization.
Integration with Nagios: Compatible with a wide range of plugins for extended functionality.
Multi-Tenancy: Supports multiple users with isolated data views.
API and Automation: Streamlines management and operational workflows.
Distributed Monitoring: Ensures reliable performance across global networks.

What benefits or ROI are users experiencing?

Scalability: Adapts to growing infrastructure with ease.
Ease of Configuration: Simplifying initial setup and ongoing adjustments.
Accurate Alerting: Reduces false positives, improving response efficiency.
System Stability: Consistent performance with minimal downtime.
Comprehensive Support: Extensive integration and customization options.

Opsview proves valuable in cloud environments for monitoring resource availability and performance. Organizations deploy it for both internal and client-facing monitoring across global regions, benefiting from enhanced event triggers and automation opportunities, particularly in deployment monitoring and service tracking.

ITRS

Sample Customers

Greater Media Detroit, University of British Columbia, Don's Farm Supply

IBM, BT, Cisco, Sky, UPS, Capgemini, Visolit, Fujitsu Services UK, UKCloud, Massachusetts Insitute of Technology, Cornell University, Incomm

Buyer's Guide

Fortra's Intermapper vs. Opsview

August 2026

Free Report: Fortra's Intermapper vs. Opsview

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortra's Intermapper vs. Opsview and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

910,005 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fortra's Intermapper vs. Opsview report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.