Fortra's Globalscape Managed File Transfer vs Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Aspera On Demand
Sponsored
Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)
21st
Average Rating
0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Fortra's Globalscape Manage...
Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)
12th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Sterling Commerce Connect:D...
Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)
9th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2024, in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category, the mindshare of Aspera On Demand is 1.3%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Fortra's Globalscape Managed File Transfer is 3.3%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct is 9.4%, up from 6.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

Use Aspera On Demand?
Share your opinion
AP
Jul 18, 2022
Enables us to automate processes and reduce dependency on other technologies
The most valuable feature is the automation engine because it allows you to script or program and it has lots of different features and options. It's something like an IDE for programmers, where they can add variables, arrays, loops, et cetera. It has much more functionality than the advanced rules component, which only has limited options. You can use automated scripts, such as those built with PowerShell, in GlobalSCAPE, as well as scripts that you build in Globalscape. It's also very important that it is designed specifically for Windows because our servers are Windows and everything that we do is in Windows. Of course, we have a few Linux servers and even an SFTP server, but it's very important to be in the Windows space. In addition, we use it to automate the submission of regulatory documentation and that is another very important functionality for us.
Ankit Rahangdale - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 6, 2022
Secure, fast, and 100% reliable
The setup depends on the requirement. In the current environment or current project, we have it as a middleware. We have other tools for displaying the output of a file, and there is an application that is taking it to the display servers so that it can display the data. That is one implementation in the current project. There are also multiple implementations for their finance-related file transmission because that requires security. All the financial data is automatically transferred by the Connect:Direct whenever the application team puts a file into one of the directories. We provide the directory where they need to put the file. We have the automation job that picks up the file and delivers it to the user or the application that needs to utilize that file. Its setup is straightforward. The concept is straightforward. All the related information is also available on the internet. If any of the newbies want to check or get some info on Connect:Direct, they can go to the IBM site, and they will get all the details regarding the implementation, configuration, and any issues they are facing. They can just check with the error message, and they will be able to get some details about it. It is a pretty straightforward tool. In open systems servers, the setup and configuration take 10 minutes or less than that. It also supports silent installation, which hardly takes two minutes. It can be deployed anywhere. It supports on-premises and cloud deployments. IBM recently provided a patch for cloud HPE servers. There were a few vulnerabilities that caused data leaks, and they have fixed that in their recent updates.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"It is much more competitively priced. Axway is probably three or four times more expensive than Globalscape. I like the server-based license. It's easier to manage than a seat license, which our previous product Axway had. Axway's license model is to charge by the account while Globalscape's model is by the server. It is much simpler and much easier when audit time comes."
"The solution is reasonably priced in comparison to other products."
"We are paying around 30K per year."
"The on-prem licensing is very good. It's a perpetual license and I would advise others to purchase that license. That way, you don't have to pay yearly."
"Maintenance and services for Globalscape EFT have an annual price tag, and it is not cheap."
"Globalscape is not cheap, but you get what you pay for. The cost is worth the value of the product. What you're getting is a good, stable solution that does a lot."
"A large factor in our decision to go with Globalscape was the price."
"It is a very good product in terms of purchase. It didn't cost that much, even with the way we had scaled and architecturally put things in place. It is definitely comparable to other products."
"Annual licensing fee."
"The price and licensing of Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct is expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Government
11%
Educational Organization
6%
Financial Services Firm
20%
Computer Software Company
13%
Healthcare Company
9%
Insurance Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
44%
Computer Software Company
10%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Globalscape Managed File Transfer?
It bolsters security with features like Data Loss Prevention and seamless integration with DLP for a safe and complia...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Globalscape Managed File Transfer?
It offers excellent value and its pricing is straightforward, making it easy to acquire, set up, and use. While there...
What needs improvement with Globalscape Managed File Transfer?
It could improve its operations by incorporating real-time collaboration features like those offered by platforms suc...
What needs improvement with Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct?
There is room for improvement in monitoring. We don't have good visibility tools and monitoring, so I believe there m...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Globalscape GlobalSCAPE Managed File Transfer
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Deluxe Digital Studios, BT, The European Space Agency, GigaScience, Groupe AB
Information Not Available
HZMO, Bank of Communications
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortra's Globalscape Managed File Transfer vs. Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct and other solutions. Updated: July 2024.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.