We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiToken and One Identity Defender based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Authentication Systems solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I believe FortiToken is the simplest to implement."
"Its ease of installation is most valuable. It took me five minutes, and it was up and running. It didn't take me that long. The installation on the cell phones is pretty simple."
"I love the push-button authentication on FortiToken Mobile. It's also great that the soft token automatically reloads the OTP at intervals, so I always have a fresh code to enter."
"The solution is simple and similar to Google Authenticator. It follows time-based authentication. We use it for hardware and software in one environment. The tool offers simple and fast authentication for SSL."
"The token-based authentication is good and modern aspect."
"Fortinet FortiToken is used for double factor authentication."
"We like the mobile FortiToken."
"The product provides secure access to our internal server."
"One Identity Defender has good network protection."
"It's very fast, and it's easy to use because it's integrated with Active Directory."
"We find that the product scales very well."
"You need your mobile just to enroll the tokens, and sometimes, it's difficult to use for someone who is not knowledgeable"
"The tool could be a little cheaper."
"The solution works well. We have nothing to complain about."
"Maybe the price could be improved, and the integration could be better. But the integration is different from the authenticator side."
"The app could be improved so that you don't have to actually type in the code. It would be great if you can just do a prompt or push similar to the way Duo does."
"We can only use the tool with the FortiToken Mobile app."
"The solution could introduce a mobile application instead of a physical product."
"I would rate the scalability a seven out of ten. The migration issue definitely brings it down a bit."
"We have some clients that are wanting to protect their Apache web servers with One Identity Defender but all the research I have done says cannot be done. It can only be oriented to an IIS server. One Identity Defender should have more integration with more types of web servers."
"Maybe it could provide support for more web applications. It seems more focused on IIS web applications."
"The login capabilities could be better."
Fortinet FortiToken is ranked 4th in Authentication Systems with 20 reviews while One Identity Defender is ranked 15th in Authentication Systems with 3 reviews. Fortinet FortiToken is rated 8.2, while One Identity Defender is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiToken writes "A stable and scalable solution that provides an affordable and perpetual license". On the other hand, the top reviewer of One Identity Defender writes "Good compatibility, responsive support, and a nice interface". Fortinet FortiToken is most compared with Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, Microsoft Entra ID, Cisco Duo, Yubico YubiKey and RSA SecurID, whereas One Identity Defender is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID and Cisco Duo. See our Fortinet FortiToken vs. One Identity Defender report.
See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.
We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
