Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

One Identity Defender vs Starling Two-Factor Authentication comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

One Identity Defender
Ranking in Authentication Systems
28th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Starling Two-Factor Authent...
Ranking in Authentication Systems
66th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Authentication Systems category, the mindshare of One Identity Defender is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Starling Two-Factor Authentication is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Authentication Systems
 

Featured Reviews

Maksym Tkachenko - PeerSpot reviewer
Good compatibility, responsive support, and a nice interface
The solution works very well. The initial setup is pretty easy. It is stable and pretty reliable in general. We find that the product scales very well.  Technical support is responsive. The interface is good.  It is compatible with other products.  It has everything we need right now. The login…
Use Starling Two-Factor Authentication?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.
865,140 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Starling Two Factor Authentication
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Bakersfield Police Department, Village of Westmont, Illinois
Akima
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: July 2025.
865,140 professionals have used our research since 2012.