We performed a comparison between Forescout Platform and Nozomi Networks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IoT Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Forescout Platform's most valuable features are that it is very granular. We are able to cull out a lot of information about our particular device or endpoint. The configuration and the visibility are very seamless. Overall the solution is very easy to handle and it's very comprehensive."
"The user management has been very easy for the most part."
"We think it's simple. We think it's very useful and we really like reports and everything."
"Ease of deployment There's a great support team that becomes actively engaged whenever we encounter issues. Their technical support is amazing. Good documentation is available. The product is stable. The solution is highly scalable. I recommend using the solution because it gives verified control over the environment. It has a great visibility feature."
"We use the Forescout Platform for device visibility and control in our network. It's very helpful for tracking malicious or unusual activity. We use it to track which ports are open, which machines are running specific services, and to identify vulnerabilities. For example, there was a vulnerability related to SMB, and we could use the product to determine which machines inside our organization were allowing SMB traffic."
"Obtaining visibility into the network and connected devices is very simple with this tool. It takes me three minutes to do a base deployment when all the parameters are available."
"The solution's implementation and operation are very easy."
"The actions that the agentless visibility, allow us to perform on the endpoint, are really amazing, especially in the way that it is done."
"Provides security for our operational technology environment for OT and IoT."
"The feature I like best is its stability."
"The most valuable feature of Nozomi Networks is its security features."
"I should be able to integrate my Forescout with any other third party security technology, to build that connected security strategy."
"The solution could always improve by adding more features to make it more robust."
"They should improve features related to IT security. ForeScout should analyze behavior to see if the behavior is malicious behavior and block this device. They should develop the ability to analyze the behavior of the device in my environment."
"Forescout Platform sometimes returns false positives, so there's some fine-tuning to be done there."
"Forescout needs to upgrade its development in the future."
"Forescout Platform could improve the costs of integrations."
"Two things can be improved in the Forescout Platform. First of all, the support for some certain proprietary protocols from other vendors, but they are very widely used. If the TechEx from Cisco, was added to Forescout, then it will be a full solution for me."
"Forescout Platform could improve the vulnerability management as well as the control on the endpoint, which needs to be connected to my network."
"Proof of concept could be improved. It could be more tangible to the customer and the end users to have a video presentation or something like that."
"It should support more programmable logic controllers (PLCs)."
"The solution should include an integration library."
Forescout Platform is ranked 1st in IoT Security with 69 reviews while Nozomi Networks is ranked 2nd in IoT Security with 3 reviews. Forescout Platform is rated 8.4, while Nozomi Networks is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of Forescout Platform writes "We can go granular on each endpoint, quarantine non-compliant machines, and target vulnerabilities through scripting". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nozomi Networks writes "Has good security features and can be used for OT visibility". Forescout Platform is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, Fortinet FortiNAC, Armis and Tenable Security Center, whereas Nozomi Networks is most compared with Claroty Platform, Tenable OT Security, Dragos, Armis and Microsoft Defender for IoT. See our Forescout Platform vs. Nozomi Networks report.
See our list of best IoT Security vendors.
We monitor all IoT Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
