Forescout Platform vs Nozomi Networks comparison

Forescout and Nozomi are both solutions in the IoT Security category. Forescout is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.2, while Nozomi is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.7. Forescout holds a 8.4% mindshare in IS, compared to Nozomi’s 13.3% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Forescout users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Nozomi users who would recommend it.

Forescout Platform

Read 78 Forescout Platform reviews

8,779 Views
1,229 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Nozomi Networks

Read 11 Nozomi Networks reviews

6,820 Views
1,978 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Forescout Platform

Nozomi Networks

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

Forescout Platform and Nozomi Networks are network security solutions designed to provide visibility and control. While Forescout excels with its integration flexibility and agentless capabilities, Nozomi Networks is recognized for its robust security features and ease in managing OT assets.

Features: Forescout Platform offers comprehensive endpoint visibility and control, dynamic policy enforcement, and a wide integration spectrum. It excels in managing both 802.1x and non-802.1x network access control and is flexible enough for centralized or decentralized deployments. In contrast, Nozomi Networks stands out for advanced network visualization and asset management, essential for OT environments.

Room for Improvement: Forescout is critiqued for its user interface, management of dual-homed devices, false positives, and high pricing. Improvements are needed in third-party integration and reporting features. Nozomi Networks could enhance its pricing strategy and provide more configuration options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Forescout Platform provides on-premises and hybrid cloud deployment options but can be complex. Nozomi Networks offers simpler deployment. Both have mixed reviews on customer service, with Forescout's support noted as sometimes slow, while Nozomi Networks is seen as more responsive.

Pricing and ROI: Forescout’s pricing is perceived as high due to endpoint licensing and integration costs, but ROI is positive when considering security effectiveness. Nozomi Networks is viewed as reasonably priced, with its ROI aligning with its feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed Forescout Platform vs. Nozomi Networks Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Forescout Platform vs. Nozomi Networks

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Forescout Platform

Ranking in IoT Security

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Access Control (NAC) (6th), Endpoint Compliance (3rd), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (19th)

Nozomi Networks

Ranking in IoT Security

2nd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Operational Technology (OT) Security (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the IoT Security category, the mindshare of Forescout Platform is 8.4%, down from 13.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nozomi Networks is 13.3%, down from 30.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IoT Security Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Nozomi Networks	13.3%
Forescout Platform	8.4%
Other	78.3%

IoT Security

Featured Reviews

AshishKumar Rai

Security Consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Comprehensive visibility has strengthened endpoint control and automated threat response across networks

When it comes to improving Forescout Platform, I have faced some issues recently, particularly with the switch integration part. When integrating a switch, it asks for the vendor type, and often it does not match. For example, one series of HP switches may not be found in that vendor list. This leads to frustration because you have to check again with different HP models, and once you integrate a switch, you cannot edit the vendor list without removing it. Other issues are being worked on, particularly related to switch integration. I believe they will be fixed in the next upgrade or patch fix. There are no major issues, but the configuration changes needed for the switch model are necessary, and I think it would help if during integration, an admin user could check the password or credential used, as they currently cannot see the password after it is entered and saved.

Read full review

Apurva Nigam

Senior Team Member In Engineering And Cybersecurity at Mindsprint

Comprehensive dashboards have enabled detailed asset visibility and proactive risk mitigation

On the negative side, I believe their AI, which is IQ, could be more improved. For example, when I export any data, there are only 50 columns available. What if there were more columns? Nozomi Networks does not provide that data, so I have to go to the query section. The AI is currently useful for writing queries in English that are converted into their coding language for queries. Sometimes it provides the correct data, and sometimes it does not understand the request. From my attempts, I would say 50 percent of the time it has given me the proper data, and 50 percent of the time it might need improvement. Every day or week, new threat intelligence and AI upgrades are being released for Vantage, and all those upgrades are being implemented. Things are getting better, but I believe there are areas of improvement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The valuable feature of the product stems from the fact that it is easy to implement."

"Overall, the stability of the product has been very good."

"This product allows monitoring and control of the PC fleet across the company."

"Its feature that I have found most valuable is that it is very granular. You can configure granular controls just as you want those policies to be implemented. It gives you that flexibility to go granular in how you want your controls to be implemented. That's something I like about it."

"I have noticed that in the last year the license model has changed from licensing the whole appliance to licensing the number of devices. It's more simple for a large installation, or a user to have CounterACT as their peripheral site in the company. It's a good choice to have changed the license policy."

"The most valuable feature for us is the real-time alerting of newly connected devices, whether they are approved or unapproved devices on our network."

"The stability is amazing for the Forescout Platform. We have been using Forescout for four years, and no one complained about the stability."

"Customer service is above average and technical support is above average."

More Forescout Platform pros

"I believe it is the best."

"I chose Nozomi because it is far ahead of other competitors, like Curator and Elastic."

"Provides security for our operational technology environment for OT and IoT."

"It brings visibility into the OT environment because most of the enterprises only have methods to check their IT environment."

"Nozomi Networks has the best AI-based detection and intrusion detection solution, as it is very robust, easy to deploy, and easy to use with a very user-friendly GUI and good support in terms of product and after-sales support."

"The network visualization feature of Nozomi impacts security operations positively."

"The most valuable feature of Nozomi Networks is its security features."

"This is a good product and I definitely recommend it."

More Nozomi Networks pros

Cons

"It is quite expensive, but there are specs for small companies as well."

"The solution could always improve by adding more features to make it more robust."

"Forescout Platform isn't flexible with connections to devices like printers and forces you to re-enter details like the MAC address after any breakdowns."

"Sometimes the switch management interface doesn't display accurate information which relates to false positives on individual switch access errors."

"The initial setup is a bit complex."

"We experienced some detection issues when checking compliance for the Sophos agent."

"The security features can be improved because we use it for sensitive information, such as compliance."

"The initial setup was complex, but that was due to the nature of the network architecture."

More Forescout Platform cons

"Creating custom queries is time-consuming."

"It should support more programmable logic controllers (PLCs)."

"The solution should include an integration library."

"Regarding the functionality of Nozomi Networks, the query syntax is very complicated. The syntax of the queries is very complex, so sometimes you will not get what you want."

"Proof of concept could be improved. It could be more tangible to the customer and the end users to have a video presentation or something like that."

"I believe there is room for improvement regarding on-premises AI."

"Nozomi Networks currently offers add-ons, such as ARP agents, that can be installed on machines to expand the information we receive from sensors. However, these are part of a licensing structure, which can be costly."

More Nozomi Networks cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Time savings in finding rogue devices as well as identifying potentially unwanted devices on the network has saved the organization time and money."

"The price of the solution is reasonable. We have paid for the license for five years. We have integration with Symantec AV for orchestration, and we have an additional license."

"You can have a flexible license depending on your environment."

"It is expensive because you have to pay for their CSM, the customer's access manager, and their professional services on top of that, and they charge you roughly $400 per hour, which is overhead."

"The price of the Forescout Platform is expensive. I purchased it for approximately 94 lakhs."

"It's about $160,000, but I'm not sure how long that is for or what it includes. Because we were a test base, we were provided with servers, but now, Forescout wants us to buy servers because those servers are now end-of-life or end-of-service. For our lifecycle management program, in order to get a refresh on those servers, we would have to buy servers or use our own network resources to house Forescout. Forescout takes up about 13 or 14 virtual CPUs."

"5,000 user licenses will cost you between seven and eight million dollars, compared to 20 million for Aruba."

"The ROI is priceless."

More Forescout Platform pricing and cost advice

"I have not seen any competition in terms of pricing, and it is quite reasonable."

"The solution's pricing is good and cheaper than that of Claroty."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IoT Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

14%

Energy/Utilities Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	44

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What advice do you have for others considering Forescout Platform?

Forescout is a very powerful NAC product that does not rely on port level configuration. It can detect and block unauthorized devices very quickly. But it has a lot of capabilities and really would...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Forescout Platform?

I would rate the Forescout Device and Visibility Control Platform at a six out of ten.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Forescout Platform?

I recommend doing a compression demo. If people use it, they will buy it. So they have to see the product in place. That's the main recommendation is to do a proof of concept. If they do, they will...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nozomi Networks?

Nozomi Networks and Claroty are on the expensive end of the market, so the client should have those budgets available.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nozomi Networks?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Nozomi Networks?

I am a service provider handling the portal for Nozomi Networks across 35 different sites. I use the dashboard, Vantage, Guardian, and CMC. I have configured everything and use the system as both a...

See all answers

Comparisons

Aruba ClearPass vs Forescout Platform

Compared 12% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Forescout Platform

Compared 11% of the time

Fortinet FortiNAC vs Forescout Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Armis vs Forescout Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Impulse Point SafeConnect vs Forescout Platform

Compared 2% of the time

More Forescout Platform Competitors

Claroty Platform vs Nozomi Networks

Compared 26% of the time

Dragos vs Nozomi Networks

Compared 13% of the time

Tenable OT Security vs Nozomi Networks

Compared 8% of the time

Armis vs Nozomi Networks

Compared 8% of the time

Honeywell Forge vs Nozomi Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Nozomi Networks Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Forescout Platform

May 2026

Download Forescout Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Nozomi Networks

April 2026

Download Nozomi Networks product report

Also Known As

Forescout Platform, CounterACT for Endpoint Compliance, ForeScout CounterACT

SCADAguardian

Overview

Forescout Platform provides comprehensive device visibility and asset management without requiring agent installation. It strengthens network access control and endpoint compliance, integrating flexibly with zero-trust architecture.

Forescout Platform offers organizations a robust solution for maintaining network security by enabling detailed monitoring of connected devices and enforcing compliance policies across IT and OT networks. Effective in sectors like finance, healthcare, and manufacturing, it controls unauthorized access, authenticates, quarantines, and remediates noncompliant devices while supporting both on-premises and cloud environments. Notable for its third-party integration, easy configuration, and customizable threat responses, Forescout Platform aids in efficient security measure maintenance.

What are the key features?

Device Visibility: Identifies and monitors all connected devices.
Asset Management: Facilitates efficient oversight of network assets.
Third-party Integration: Offers compatibility with many security systems.
No Agent Installation Required: Simplifies setup and reduces overhead.
Network Access Control: Protects networks with automated policy enforcement.
Endpoint Compliance: Ensures devices adhere to security policies.
Customizable Threat Responses: Tailors actions to specific security threats.

What are the benefits to look for?

Flexibility: Adapts to diverse IT environments with ease.
Zero-trust Integration: Enhances security with robust architecture compatibility.
Ease of Use: Reduces complexity in setup and operation.
Comprehensive Visibility: Maintains detailed insight into network devices.

Forescout Platform finds widespread adoption across industries like finance, healthcare, and manufacturing. It is particularly valued for enforcing cybersecurity measures and maintaining compliance in diverse operational environments, handling network access and device management challenges efficiently.

Forescout

Nozomi Networks enhances ICS and OT cybersecurity through threat detection, monitoring, and comprehensive asset management. Users value its real-time anomaly detection, advanced threat detection via machine learning, and intuitive interface, which streamline workflows and boost efficiency, ensuring compliance and robust network security.

Nozomi

Sample Customers

NHS Sussex, SAP, SEGA, Vistaprint, Miami Children's Hospital, Pioneer Investments, New York Law School, OmnicomGroup, Meritrust

Enel, FireEye, GlaxoSmithKline, VEC, TAGSEC Group

Buyer's Guide

Forescout Platform vs. Nozomi Networks

April 2026

Free Report: Forescout Platform vs. Nozomi Networks

Find out what your peers are saying about Forescout Platform vs. Nozomi Networks and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Forescout Platform vs. Nozomi Networks report.

See our list of best IoT Security vendors.

We monitor all IoT Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.