Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention comparison

Forcepoint and McAfee are both solutions in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category. Forcepoint is ranked #34 with an average rating of 7.0, while McAfee is ranked #27 with an average rating of 7.7. Forcepoint holds a 0.3% mindshare in DLP, compared to McAfee’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Forcepoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 76% of McAfee users who would recommend it.

Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Pr...

Read 3 Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP reviews

120 Views
51 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

McAfee Total Protection for...

Read 29 McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention reviews

489 Views
353 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Pr...

McAfee Total Protection for...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention and Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP compete in the DLP market. Forcepoint seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced risk-based capabilities, despite McAfee's strengths in pricing and support.

Features: McAfee Total Protection offers comprehensive security protocols, strong policy management, and robust integration capabilities. Forcepoint is known for adaptive risk-based protection, real-time incident response, and AI-driven insights, providing a significant advantage in adaptability and intelligence.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: McAfee is simpler to deploy with excellent customer support, making it accessible to new clients. Forcepoint, while more complex due to its adaptive technologies, offers responsive customer service that assists in navigating its architecture.

Pricing and ROI: McAfee's initial setup costs are more budget-friendly, with good ROI for balanced security investments. Forcepoint demands higher upfront costs but delivers substantial long-term ROI through proactive risk management, offering greater financial returns with advanced features over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP vs. McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP vs. McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Pr...

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

34th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

McAfee Total Protection for...

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

27th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is 1.0%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

Nataraj KS

CISO at V Guard Industries Ltd

Stable product, key part of cybersecurity strategy but country-specific configuration issues requiring manual work

The onboarding process wasn't inherently complex, but it did take some time to open ports and configure the server. We're using three components of DLP: Endpoint DLP, email DLP, and web DLP. Web DLP isn't fully configured yet because we don't have a proxy. Email DLP took some additional coordination with a third party, and our Office 365 API, but those challenges were resolved. We have it installed and deployed on-premises. We have a partner who maintains it. It covers around 3,000 endpoints. It's deployed across our branches, factories, warehouses, and head office. It covers all endpoints in those locations. The deployment took some time due to our different locations.

Read full review

VivekGupta7

DGM at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Versatile with good patching and a straightforward setup

There is some fine-tuning needed, even once you define something. We need to do a lot of configuration. It would be easier if they made the configuration simpler, especially in the beginning. They need to give the user more choices and provide more guidance to help avoid problems later on. We'd like some more built-in predictive analytics so we can be prepared for what might happen in the future. We did have some bandwidth issues during setup. If your update fails, you may have stability issues. We find it difficult to reach higher levels of support when we face larger issues.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It primarily influences policy enforcement, cloud application access control, and endpoint network coverage."

"We chose Forcepoint as part of our cybersecurity strategy, and one of the key expectations was to prevent data leakage."

"Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP is purely a DLP-based solution, which makes it the best option available."

"The most valuable feature right now is the user control."

"The product is largely stable."

"You can manage your compliance in line with legislation such as GDPR and POPIA."

"The interface showcases threat incidents very well."

"Enables customization of file types and for different scenarios."

"The solution is very user-friendly and valuable."

"The product provides us with an excellent, dependable solution to recommend to clients for their security needs."

"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is a very stable product."

More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention pros

Cons

"From an end user's perspective, it's not always clear what's happening with the DLP. It would be beneficial to have more use cases available, perhaps on a countrywide basis."

"The deployment is a little bit difficult. It requires two to three separate servers for databases and the application."

"The SaaS solution needs improvement, especially the malware-centric part, although the CASB is better but mostly data-centric. The after-sale support could also be improved."

"The product fails to offer automatic classification capabilities to its users."

"There are a lot of vulnerabilities and viruses and malware can proliferate."

"The licensing cost for McAfee Total Protection could be cheaper, but apart from that, I don't need anything else. The software has what I need."

"When this solution is used it requires a lot of administration because the users can have difficulties using it and require assistance. The administrators are continuously modifying the policies for the users. Technical support will be used frequently."

"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention could improve by having artificial intelligence."

"Our client is not very happy with the lack of support, the skills, and the effectiveness of the tool."

"McAfee needs to clarify its rules."

"Lacks GDPR regulations to enhance security."

More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing cost is roughly 90 US dollars per year, per license."

"I'm paying the license for McAfee Total Protection yearly. It could be cheaper, but it's fine."

"There is an annual license to use this solution."

"The price is high for this type of product."

"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is an expensive solution."

"The price of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is expensive. It is not the most expensive solution but it is typically 15 to 20 percent higher than other solutions. There is no additional cost to using McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention."

"If the client purchases the entire suite of McAfee Endpoint, the license is included."

"The price of the solution could improve."

"The price of the solution could improve, it is expensive. We typically sell one and three-year licenses."

More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Retailer

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP?

It primarily influences policy enforcement, cloud application access control, and endpoint network coverage.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP?

Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP is very costly, especially in Sri Lanka, but the compliance ROI justifies the investment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP?

The SaaS solution needs improvement, especially the malware-centric part, although the CASB ( /products/casb-reviews ) is better but mostly data-centric. The after-sale support could also be improved.

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention?

The tool focuses on endpoints rather than networks. Endpoints cover everything. It wouldn't be possible to steal confidential information from endpoints.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention?

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention?

The product’s pricing could be cheaper.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

HP Wolf Security vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

Compared 81% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

Compared 5% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

Compared 3% of the time

Cisco Secure Endpoint vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

Compared 2% of the time

More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

June 2025

Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP report

Download Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP product report

Buyer's Guide

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

May 2025

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention report

Download McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention product report

Also Known As

No data available

McAfee Total Protection for Data, McAfee Total Protection for DLP, Total Protection for Data, Intel Security Total Protection for Data

Overview

Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP offers dynamic security measures tailored to data protection needs, ensuring sensitive information is safeguarded efficiently.

Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP is designed to provide a balanced approach to data loss prevention by adapting security measures based on real-time risk assessment. This innovative system prioritizes protecting sensitive information while allowing for seamless workflow integration, making it a suitable choice for organizations looking to enhance their data protection strategies.

What are the key features of Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP?

Dynamic Policy Enforcement: Automatically adjusts security policies in real-time based on risk analysis.
User Behavior Analysis: Monitors and analyzes user actions to identify potential threats.
Comprehensive Data Coverage: Offers protection for data across various environments and platforms.
Risk-Adaptive Responses: Provides threat mitigation options based on the assessed level of risk.

What benefits and ROI can be expected?

Reduced Data Breach Risks: By dynamically adjusting security measures, threats are mitigated proactively.
Operational Efficiency: Allows seamless integration of security with daily operations, minimizing disruptions.
Scalable Protection: Easily adapts to organizational growth and evolving security needs.
Cost-Effective Security: Optimizes resource allocation by focusing on high-risk areas.

Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP is particularly effective in industries with stringent data protection requirements such as healthcare, finance, and government. It adapts its security posture to the specific risks faced in these sectors, addressing compliance mandates and safeguarding sensitive information efficiently.

Forcepoint

McAfee Total Protection for Data solution suite protects your data using a combination of powerful encryption, access control, and user-behavior monitoring.

McAfee

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Kleberg Bank

Buyer's Guide

Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP vs. McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

June 2025

Free Report: Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP vs. McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

Find out what your peers are saying about Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP vs. McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP vs. McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention report.

See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.