We performed a comparison between FME and Matillion ETL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It has standard plug-ins available for different data sources."
"All spatial features are unrivaled, and the possibility to execute them based on a scheduled trigger, manual, e-mail, Websocket, tweet, file/directory change or virtually any trigger is most valuable."
"It has a very friendly user interface. You don't need to use a lot of code. For us that's the most important aspect about it. Also, it has a lot of connectors and few forms. It has a strong facial aspect. It can do a lot of facial analysis."
"The most valuable feature of FME is the graphical user interface. There is nothing better. It is very easy to debug because you can see all steps where there are failures. Overall the software is easy to optimize a process."
"We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else."
"The most valuable feature of Matillion ETL is the UI experience in which you can drag and drop most of the transformation."
"It's been able to do everything we require."
"Matillion ETL has great Git integration that is perfect and convenient to use."
"The new version with the Productivity Cloud is very simple. It's easy to use, navigate, and understand."
"Matillion ETL is one hundred percent stable."
"It has improved the costs of managing my customer’s data."
"It has good integrations with Amazon Redshift and other AWS services."
"The product has a good user interface."
"FME's price needs improvement for the African market."
"FME can improve the geographical transformation. I've had some problems with the geographical transformations, but it's probably mostly because I'm not the most skilled geographer in-house. The solution requires some in-depth knowledge to perform some functions."
"To get a higher rating, it would have to improve the price and the associated scalability. These are the main issues."
"Improvements could be made to mapping presentations."
"The one thing that always appears in the community is the ability to make really easy loops to loop through data efficiently. That needs to be added at some point."
"It needs integration with more data sources."
"Sometimes, we have issues with the solution's stability and need to restart it for three weeks or more."
"Our main challenge currently is that Matillion runs on an EC2 instance, limiting us to running only two processes simultaneously at the entry level."
"In the next release, we would like to have connections to more databases."
"The product must enhance its near-real-time data capture feature."
"Matillion’s on-premises capabilities don’t allow you to build something customized."
"The tool's lineage is very weak."
"Ideally, I would like it to integrate with Secrets Manager as well as the AWS."
FME is ranked 25th in Data Integration with 5 reviews while Matillion ETL is ranked 4th in Cloud Data Integration with 24 reviews. FME is rated 8.6, while Matillion ETL is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of FME writes "Great for handling large volumes of data, but it is priced a bit high". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Matillion ETL writes "Efficient data integration and transformation with seamless cloud-native integration". FME is most compared with Azure Data Factory, Alteryx Designer, Talend Open Studio, SSIS and AWS Glue, whereas Matillion ETL is most compared with Snowflake, Azure Data Factory, AWS Glue, Informatica PowerCenter and SSIS. See our FME vs. Matillion ETL report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
