We performed a comparison between Flux and Fortra's Globalscape Managed File Transfer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon, BMC, ActiveBatch (ASCI ) by Redwood and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT).
Earn 20 points
Flexible, integrated solution to meet highly complex processing needs with job scheduling, batch processor, and managed file transfer.
Flux automates batch processes into comprehensive workflows. Flux's batch job scheduling runs reports, triggers database jobs, runs Java code, executes ETL processes, transfers files, and runs command lines or shell scripts. Flux integrates batch job scheduling, managed file transfer, database queries and stored procedures, web services, and error handling to automate your batch job scheduling needs.
Globalscape is consistently recognized for providing top-notch solutions for securing and automating file transfers for Windows-centric organizations.
Flux is ranked 36th in Managed File Transfer (MFT) while Fortra's Globalscape Managed File Transfer is ranked 13th in Managed File Transfer (MFT) with 3 reviews. Flux is rated 10.0, while Fortra's Globalscape Managed File Transfer is rated 8.4. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortra's Globalscape Managed File Transfer writes "The API call and file synchronization options are standout features ". Flux is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, whereas Fortra's Globalscape Managed File Transfer is most compared with AWS Transfer for SFTP, MOVEit, Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct, BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer and WS_FTP Server.
See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.
We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.