No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Fischer Identity – Identity as a Service vs Idira IGA comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 2, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Fischer Identity – Identity...
Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)
39th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Idira IGA
Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)
6th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
Identity Management (IM) (6th), Identity Governance Administration (IGA) (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category, the mindshare of Fischer Identity – Identity as a Service is 0.7%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Idira IGA is 1.6%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Idira IGA1.6%
Fischer Identity – Identity as a Service0.7%
Other97.7%
Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

Use Fischer Identity – Identity as a Service?
Leave a review
Sasikiran Sakalabattina - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr Infrastructure engineer at TechMahindra
Automated lifecycle governance has reduced manual access work and strengthens audit readiness
CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla significantly reduces manual access management efforts due to day-to-day activities. RBAC and role mining actually reduce manual access management efforts significantly. RBAC is the best feature, and it provides AI capabilities. The second feature I value most is identifying lifecycle management for joiner, mover, and leaver scenarios. CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla has one feature that provides strong access reviews, compliance reports, automation, and audit readiness with centralized governance. Centralized governance means we can handle everything at one point, making it a very strong feature. This is integrated with another feature such as SaaS integrations for strong security posture and faster provisioning with reduced operational overhead. These are the four features I value most, and with all my three years of experience, I use and appreciate these four features most. The impact of automation on my access reviews is that it automates the provisioning and de-provisioning. If I were to perform manual tasks such as provisioning and de-provisioning without automation, it would require a lot of time to handle. With this automation, we easily accomplish provisioning or de-provisioning. We simply get the Active Directory users and create the VPNs, cloud, and enterprise applications without any manual intervention. AI-driven role management and RBAC automation significantly reduce service tickets. Without automation, I would need to handle tickets, which involve a lot of manual work and requires additional manual employees. Without automation, this leads to approval delays and manual access assignment efforts. Automated access reviews provide simple audit reports, and by complying with the report, it improves audit readiness while reducing operational workload for IT and security teams.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
920,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
16%
Construction Company
14%
Pharma/Biotech Company
14%
Retailer
9%
Outsourcing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise16
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zilla Security?
The experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was a bit costly, and for a larger environment, it took millions, depending on the number of licenses required.
What needs improvement with Zilla Security?
Idira IGA needs more focus on non-human identities; as we move into Agentic AI or GenAI features, we should concentrate on setting guardrails for Agentic AI and related accounts, which is a primary...
What is your primary use case for Zilla Security?
My main use case for Idira IGA is integrations with other external applications and reconciling AD accounts with other applications, which acts as an entitlement or access provisioning and de-provi...
 

Also Known As

Fischer Identity-as-a-Service
Zilla Security
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Maryland Institute College of Art (MICA)
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Okta, One Identity and others in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS). Updated: October 2026.
920,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.