Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Ivanti Tunnel comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Man...
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
118
Ranking in other categories
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) (2nd)
Ivanti Tunnel
Average Rating
10.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Infrastructure VPN (19th)
 

Mindshare comparison

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) and Ivanti Tunnel aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is designed for Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) and holds a mindshare of 15.2%, down 16.3% compared to last year.
Ivanti Tunnel, on the other hand, focuses on Enterprise Infrastructure VPN, holds 0.5% mindshare, down 0.6% since last year.
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
 

Featured Reviews

Richard Polyak - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 21, 2022
Reduces maintenance downtime and has a strong user community
Our primary use cases for F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager are high availability for applications and SSL offload certificates F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager helps reduce our downtime for maintenance purposes. It also offers us ease of use for the deployment of certificates onto a central…
AK
Nov 6, 2023
Provides efficient data security and good technical support services
We use Ivanti Tunnel to provide and publish access to on-premise applications The product's interface needs improvement. I rate the product's stability a ten out of ten. One of our Ivanti Tunnel's customers manages 300 end users, and another customer manages 200 end users. I rate its…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I've worked a little bit with iRules and it is amazing."
"Initial setup is easy and pretty standard."
"We plan to create packages of services from which it will be possible to build comprehensive tailor-made solutions."
"The F5 GTM/BIGIP DNS (Global Traffic Manager) is a valuable feature. This feature allows for DNS load balancing, which means that high availability and load sharing can be done across services locally, as well as across datacenters with advanced capabilities​."
"Good application firewall."
"It has so many features. ​First of all, it has a full proxy architecture, it has multiple modules. The best feature is the WAF, the web application firewall module. It also has cashing type capabilities. It has all kinds of load-balancing algorithms based on your IT requirements."
"The solution is robust and reliable."
"The product is quite flexible."
"The technical support team provides good services and faster response times."
 

Cons

"I would like F5 to incorporate the ability to create your own custom roles and customised permissions within the product set. I have seen many customers wanting to give a certain level of access for the purposes of out-of-hours servicing to out-of-hours staff or teams that fulfill an operations type role."
"It requires a particular skill or training before being able to manage it."
"Needs to provide a visual interface to follow a customer's activity (from client to BIG-IP to SNAT IP to the chosen server, then back). Today, we are still performing packet captures."
"The SharePoint SSO part has some room for improvement."
"The GUI needs improvement."
"The price for F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager is very high. This aspect could be improved."
"F5 BIG-IP LTM can improve on the SSL loading which includes the authentication of certificates. Although, most of these issues have been solved there are still some issue that persists."
"The logging features are too limited and do not give us a solid understanding of what's happening."
"The product's interface needs improvement."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are additional costs depending on what modules or what functionality is required."
"It is the best solution, but that comes with an increased price."
"It is a little pricey. I wish the pricing was cheaper, but I wish the pricing was cheaper for everything."
"We have found the pricing and licensing on AWS to be competitive."
"It was probably a one-time purchase and then you have maintenance, but I don't have the details on that. We bought what they called the Best bundle at the time, which pretty much included all of the modules. There was probably no additional cost afterward."
"We are on an annual license to use the solution."
"The tool is a bit expensive."
"This is a high-priced tool. We pay for its license yearly."
"The product has average pricing."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions are best for your needs.
813,418 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
14%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
17%
Government
13%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with F5 BIG-IP?
Price is an area of the tool where improvements are required. I want to see CDN capabilities in the product.
What do you like most about Ivanti Tunnel?
The technical support team provides good services and faster response times.
What needs improvement with Ivanti Tunnel?
The product's interface needs improvement.
 

Also Known As

F5 BIG-IP, BIG-IP LTM, F5 ASM, Viprion, F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition , Crescendo Networks Application Delivery Controller, BIG IP
MobileIron Tunnel
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Riken, TransUnion, Tepco Systems Administration, Daejeon University, G&T Bank, Danamon, CyberAgent Inc.
Nasdaq, FlixBUS, USDA, The Blackstone Group, J.B Hunt
Find out what your peers are saying about NetScaler, F5, HAProxy and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC). Updated: October 2024.
813,418 professionals have used our research since 2012.