Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs Icinga comparison

ExtraHop Networks and Icinga are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. ExtraHop Networks is ranked #72, while Icinga is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.0. ExtraHop Networks holds a 0.6% mindshare in NMS, compared to Icinga’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ExtraHop Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Icinga users who would recommend it.
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT O...
Read 8 ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations reviews
  • 1,247 Views
  • 898 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Icinga
Read 17 Icinga reviews
  • 3,873 Views
  • 3,370 Comparison Views
85% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations and Icinga are competitors in the IT operations management category. Icinga appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive monitoring and alerting capabilities despite ExtraHop's edge in certain advanced analytical features.

Features: ExtraHop Reveal(x) provides network traffic analysis, real-time visibility, and threat detection capabilities. Icinga is known for infrastructure monitoring, customizable dashboards, and effective alerting systems.

Room for Improvement: ExtraHop could enhance integration capabilities, improve user interface complexity, and expand third-party plugin support. Icinga may benefit from simplifying deployment processes, enhancing advanced analytics features, and offering more dedicated technical support options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Icinga presents a flexible open-source platform that can be complex to deploy, but it offers extensive documentation and community support. ExtraHop Reveal(x) offers a straightforward deployment process with dedicated support, beneficial for organizations seeking direct assistance.

Pricing and ROI: ExtraHop Reveal(x) entails higher upfront costs due to its enterprise-level capabilities and dedicated support. Icinga offers a lower-cost setup with its open-source nature, providing ROI through custom configurations, appealing to cost-sensitive environments.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. Icinga Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. Icinga
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 869,785 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT O...
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
72nd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Network Diagnostics (12th), IT Operations Analytics (14th), Network Packet Capture (8th)
Icinga
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
19th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Server Monitoring (11th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (27th), Cloud Monitoring Software (20th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations is 0.6%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Icinga is 2.8%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Icinga2.8%
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations0.6%
Other96.6%
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

Out West - PeerSpot reviewer
Great for identifying application interdependencies with helpful support but needs better visualizations
We're just trying to identify the application interdependencies, which normally reside on different servers, including web servers, database servers, enterprise service bus, et cetera, up to your presentation layer before we start moving stuff around. Normally, the reason why we use these tools is to understand what assets we have, where they're deployed, and how they enter and operate before we decide to go move something from point A to point B. The solution is going to allow me to establish a wave or migration plan where you have different waves of migration and then you actually have move groups to try and get your application moved from A to B seamlessly. A to B could be on-premise to on-premise. It could be on-premise to cloud. Et cetera. The solution can tell me what components can I deploy, for example, into a cloud space, without having to refactor my applications since that can be quite time-consuming and costly.
Read full review
Harrison Bulley - PeerSpot reviewer
A stable, scalable and cost-effective solution that helps with inbuilt scripts for easy modification
I think the software is quite good, but we have had problems with getting it to recognize certain areas and amend certain checks, where we needed so we would have to create backend scripts for those checks. Though, being open source, it has the support to create backend scripts, it would be better to have these scripts in-built.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable features are security detections, perimeter detection, dashboards, and alerts."
"The most valuable feature is the way it handles data, from Layer 2 up to Layer 7. We can see everything that happens in the network."
"Not only can you look at the protocol import level. It also has a live PCAP analysis."
"Wire data analytics."
"This solution is more applications reference architecture focused. Its benefit is that it specializes in that space."
"There are many valuable features in this product, but probably the biggest is the customization capability it has."
"Icinga has multiple automation and integration features. There is an API for everything and a web UI for configurations. The APIs enable you to automate tasks in Icinga. We can also use plugins to talk to the API. The Icinga Director talks to a database in the background, and you can import settings from the CMDB to all systems in Icinga."
"There's a module called Icinga Director, which helps us configure the product using an intuitive interface through clicks instead of creating a text configuration. It's very helpful for us."
"This solution has a self-healing handler where if the service is down, it is automatically restarted."
"I like the ability to amend and adjust things really easily, which is useful in a case where you could make it auto-discover and then set a template to say all of these applications or servers under this template have an automatic threshold set that you’d set up manually."
"Icinga does the job and is fairly stable."
"The value of Icinga is that it has hundreds of plugins, so it's really easy to monitor pretty much anything."
"It is really easy in Icinga to create your own plugin and integrate it without any fuss. And it works just perfectly fine."
"The apply rules feature saves a lot of time."
More Icinga pros
 

Cons

"This solution would be improved if it had the ability to retain data longer."
"Network visibility is something that needs to be improved."
"I would improve the Rule-Based Access Control (RBAC) by providing granular access control to the data."
"They either have to go broad or decide what their bread and butter is and get really good at that."
"We'd like to see a local presence within the region in order to have seamless service whether it's the support, the implementation, or professional services."
"They have a new solution, ExtraHop Reveal(x), and I think it needs improvement."
"The solution lacks many features important to higher-level IT management and network support."
"One of the areas that are frustrating is remote monitoring for more than one machine."
"Icinga’s automation could be improved."
"There is room for improvement in multi-tenancy. It's not perfect, not even really good. It's average, but it should be improved."
"The user interface should be improved."
"It needs Trap SNMP. I saw the documentation for Zabbix, that it has its own built-in product which handles SNMP traps, and there's nothing similar in Icinga or Nagios. I think this feature is most important for me."
"The tool currently fails to provide notifications to users."
"One thing that Icinga lacks is the capability to create advanced and customized dashboards within the tool itself."
More Icinga cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is fair considering the value provided."
"The price of this solution for our environment is about £650,000 ($855,000 USD) for three years."
"The pricing is higher than other solutions, but with such good features, I think it's worth it."
"It's an open-source solution."
"This is an open-source solution with paid support."
"We're using the free version of Icinga."
"The solution is free to use."
"It is cost-effective, and the return on investment can be very interesting because the price is low."
"The product is inexpensive compared to other DBM products."
"The solution is cheap."
"Even though Icinga's financial cost is low, it is an expensive product regarding the resources required to maintain and operate it."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
869,785 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
13%
Healthcare Company
9%
Educational Organization
7%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Computer Software Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Educational Organization
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise3
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise7
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Icinga?
The best thing about the solution is how it highlights errors, the issues, and what needs my attention. The solution directs me to areas that I should look for first.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Icinga?
It is cost-effective, and the return on investment can be very interesting because the price is low. If you want to include this product in the services you offer to your customers, the return on i...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Icinga?
There is room for improvement in multi-tenancy. It's not perfect, not even really good. It's average, but it should be improved. For instance, multi-tenancy for monitoring the virtual infrastructur...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Splunk Observability Cloud vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
Compared 32% of the time
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Logo
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
Compared 17% of the time
ThousandEyes vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Logo
ThousandEyes vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
Compared 13% of the time
ExtremeAnalytics vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Logo
ExtremeAnalytics vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
Compared 11% of the time
Netrounds vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Logo
Netrounds vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
Compared 11% of the time
More ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Competitors
Zabbix vs Icinga Logo
Zabbix vs Icinga
Compared 38% of the time
Nagios Core vs Icinga Logo
Nagios Core vs Icinga
Compared 18% of the time
Checkmk vs Icinga Logo
Checkmk vs Icinga
Compared 11% of the time
Nagios XI vs Icinga Logo
Nagios XI vs Icinga
Compared 5% of the time
Datadog vs Icinga Logo
Datadog vs Icinga
Compared 3% of the time
More Icinga Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
October 2025
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations reportDownload ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations product report
Buyer's Guide
Icinga
October 2025
Icinga reportDownload Icinga product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Icinga Cloud Monitoring
 

Overview

The ExtraHop Application Performance Management Solution Delivers Unified Visibility Across the IT Environment w/ Proactive Alerts & Accelerated Troubleshooting

ExtraHop Networks

Icinga is a robust tool for monitoring IT infrastructure, known for its distributed monitoring capabilities and seamless integration with multiple platforms. It efficiently observes servers, network devices, and environments like Linux and Windows, enabling proactive issue identification and resource management.

With a focus on task delegation and clustering, Icinga offers an intuitive interface through its GUI and Icinga Director, simplifying configuration. The extensive plugin library supports diverse technologies, while the API allows automation with tools like Terraform and Ansible. Despite its strengths, users report challenges with data display in the GUI, a need for improved dashboards, and complex configuration processes. Users benefit from its SNMP alerts, email notifications, and automated incident handling, making it essential for managed service environments and enterprises.

What are the key features of Icinga?
  • Task Delegation: Streamlines monitoring tasks across distributed systems.
  • Event Handler: Enables automatic service recovery with minimal intervention.
  • Plugin Library: Offers extensive support for integrating diverse technologies.
  • API Accessibility: Facilitates automation with popular tools like Terraform.
  • Custom Plugins: Allows easy creation and personalization for monitoring needs.
What benefits should you consider in Icinga reviews?
  • Flexibility: Tailors monitoring to specific requirements with community support.
  • Scalability: Successfully manages growing infrastructure demands.
  • Proactivity: Enhances issue identification and resource allocation.
  • Integration: Seamlessly works with existing IT operations platforms.

Icinga is widely adopted in IT environments for monitoring servers, networks, and applications across industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology. Its ability to integrate with various operating systems and automation platforms makes it a versatile choice for industries prioritizing comprehensive surveillance and proactive management of their infrastructure.

Icinga
 

Sample Customers

Alaska Airlines, bet365, Concur, McKesson, Microsoft, Morgan Stanley, Practice Fusion, Seattle Children's Hospital, Steward Health Care System
Puppet Labs, Audi, Spacex, Debian, Snapdeal, McGill, RIPE Network Coordination Centre
Buyer's Guide
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. Icinga
September 2025
Free Report: ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. Icinga
Find out what your peers are saying about ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. Icinga and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
869,785 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. Icinga report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.