Everest Blueriq vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Everest Logo
250 views|204 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo
979 views|768 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Everest Blueriq and OpenText 360 for SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM).
To learn more, read our detailed Business Process Management (BPM) Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
ChrisBiemans
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The biggest benefit of using the product is identifying the issues, enabling a more flexible working method."

More Everest Blueriq Pros →

"In terms of its most valuable features, this solution, in general, will provide all you need and it's very convenient to use. We can share our details to collaborative platforms. We can give access to users. It's pretty flexible.""It has a lot of flexibility, and Microsoft does come up with some new additions from time to time.""The most valuable features are collaboration, traceability, retention of documents, and search.""The fact that you can see and create something that fits your business is the most valuable thing in this platform. It is a customizable product, so it fits your needs.""This solution has good connection and we do not need to migrate everything in order to protect the repository.""The most valuable feature of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is its performance. The solution is one of the best in the market if you search the internet.""The product has a strong and easy integration with Teams.""It's all now on cloud subscription, so you can use all the features without worrying about making the system updates patches."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint Pros →

Cons
"The platform's initial setup process could be better."

More Everest Blueriq Cons →

"OpenText 360 is generally stable, though there are sometimes issues with document size or format.""The platform's workflows could be more intuitive and easier to use.""An area for improvement would be how the platform handles large volumes of documents. It also doesn't provide a very good, robust backup and restore capacity. In the next release, I would like the search technology to be improved.""They need to come with more out of the box solutions, rather than depending on customers to develop them.""Integration is an area where the solution lacks.""Its licensing needs to be simplified. Currently, its licensing is very complex. It contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify the licensing and make it easier to understand. It would make a customer's life easier.""They are not going for any add-ons right now. It's the same version we are still using and there is no plan of upgrading and/or creating any add-ons at all.""If I have to really create an internal knowledge management portal, if I have to compare SharePoint and WordPress, WordPress is far, far better in regard to the SharePoint option."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Its price is reasonable, but its licensing is very complex. This platform contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify its licensing."
  • "On-premises version is expensive"
  • "SharePoint uses a subscription model."
  • "There is a license needed to use OpenText 360 for SharePoint and we pay annually. The price of the solution could be less expensive."
  • "OpenText 360's price varies depending on how long you've been a customer, how many licenses you have, and which products you use."
  • "The solution has a very complex pricing model."
  • "Pricing is a part of the enterprise agreement that we have."
  • "It has a reasonable price."
  • More OpenText 360 for SharePoint Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The biggest benefit of using the product is identifying the issues, enabling a more flexible working method.
    Top Answer:The platform's initial setup process could be better.
    Top Answer:We use Everest Blueriq for a food safety organization, that revolves around automating and managing complex processes critical to ensuring food safety and compliance. It involves monitoring containers… more »
    Top Answer:The product has a strong and easy integration with Teams.
    Top Answer:OpenText 360 for SharePoint offers subscription-based licensing. It has a reasonable price. I rate the pricing a seven out of ten.
    Top Answer:The platform's workflows could be more intuitive and easier to use. They could enhance the integration with Power BI and make it seamless, similar to Teams.
    Ranking
    Views
    250
    Comparisons
    204
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    282
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    979
    Comparisons
    768
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    505
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Blueriq, Aquima
    Process 360, Global 360, OpenText Process 360
    Learn More
    Everest
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    Blueriq is the software platform for organizations with knowledge-based, rule-driven business processes. By modeling these processes in one central area, automate and integrate, you can respond quickly to changes, creating the ultimate customer experience and streamline your services.
    With Process360, businesses can take advantage of enterprise process applications delivered on top of SharePoint that also leverage other Microsoft technologies for content management, collaboration, user interface design, and integrated communications.
    Sample Customers
    Abn Amro, Aegon, duo, City of Tilburg
    iTAC Software, AG Alcatel-Lucent, Pacific Life, Deutsche Verbindungsstelle Krankenversicherung Ausland (DVKA)
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Government12%
    Energy/Utilities Company9%
    Computer Software Company8%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise46%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise74%
    Buyer's Guide
    Business Process Management (BPM)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: April 2024.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Everest Blueriq is ranked 33rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews while OpenText 360 for SharePoint is ranked 15th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews. Everest Blueriq is rated 8.0, while OpenText 360 for SharePoint is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Everest Blueriq writes "Stable platform with valuable case management capabilities ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText 360 for SharePoint writes "A great, collaborative environment with scalability for many products". Everest Blueriq is most compared with Pega BPM, whereas OpenText 360 for SharePoint is most compared with Apache Airflow, IBM BPM, Bizagi, Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms and IBM Business Automation Workflow.

    See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

    We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.