OpenText ProVision vs erwin Evolve by Quest comparison

erwin by Quest and OpenText are both solutions in the Enterprise Architecture Management category. erwin by Quest is ranked #11 with an average rating of 9.0, while OpenText is ranked #27. erwin by Quest holds a 2.7% mindshare in AM, compared to OpenText’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of erwin by Quest users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

erwin Evolve by Quest

Read 19 erwin Evolve by Quest reviews

870 Views
525 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

OpenText ProVision

Read 3 OpenText ProVision reviews

135 Views
74 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

erwin Evolve by Quest

OpenText ProVision

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Erwin Evolve by Quest and OpenText ProVision are competing enterprise architecture management tools. Erwin Evolve by Quest appears to have the upper hand in pricing and customer support, making it a cost-effective option, while OpenText ProVision is favored for its advanced features.

Features: Erwin Evolve by Quest provides strong modeling capabilities, data visualization, and collaboration tools focused on integration and business alignment. OpenText ProVision stands out with its robust analytics, comprehensive architecture diagrams, and extensive repository management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Erwin Evolve by Quest offers a cloud-based deployment model ensuring ease of use and flexibility, backed by responsive customer service. OpenText ProVision, also cloud-based, is supported with detailed training resources and comprehensive support.

Pricing and ROI: Erwin Evolve by Quest features competitive setup costs appealing to budget-conscious organizations with satisfactory ROI due to its alignment of IT with business goals. OpenText ProVision has higher setup costs but provides greater long-term value and ROI with its advanced feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText ProVision vs. erwin Evolve by Quest Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText ProVision vs. erwin Evolve by Quest

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

erwin Evolve by Quest

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

11th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (19th)

OpenText ProVision

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

27th

Average Rating

6.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (48th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Enterprise Architecture Management category, the mindshare of erwin Evolve by Quest is 2.7%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText ProVision is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Architecture Management

Featured Reviews

Asish Sahu

SPM at Infosys

The reverse engineering capabilities are quite useful.

Evolve is primarily focused on the entity's licenses diagrams, but it would be nice if erwin could integrate case development, so that it shows the ER diagram plus certain inputs on the use cases and how the data is used. That deviates somewhat from the overall scope, so maybe they could call it a different product.

Read full review

reviewer1944672

Senior Director, Head of Process & Functional Architecture, Intelligent Automation at a real estate/law firm with 10,001+ employees

Good attribute attachment but problems with collaboration

I primarily use OpenText ProVision to create our end-to-end process repository and library for different parts of the organization, capturing the collaboration process to get the right inputs OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ability to share and collaborate on the solution is its most valuable feature."

"Evolve is like a tank. You can do whatever you want with the solution, but you need to customize it. I think that it's not very aligned with the framework for enterprise architecture. MEGA is focused on these enterprise architectures, but it's only for that. With Evolve, you can do everything you want with professional services."

"The most valuable features for us are impact analysis, where I can easily visualize the impact of change."

"Workgroup Repository collection of data models allows research across models without worry about platform incompatibilities and provides easy KPIs about corporate data assets."

"The feature that stands out for me is the ease of configuring objects and the screens to show them. It's really easy to add a new type of object in this reference. Creating a new type of object, using it, and evolving it a little bit in terms of what we can document about it are the main features that made us decide to use this provider."

"Forward and reverse engineering were valuable features."

"Support for a broad range of data sources from relational to big data to the Cloud."

"One of the most valuable features is the website that sits on top of the database. There's a database of objects and how they are related, and you can make views and diagrams and visual elements out of that information on the website. The website is the part that is called Evolve and we use the Evolve Designer and publish the website out to our employees. They can click around and navigate and search, etc."

More erwin Evolve by Quest pros

"The stability of the product is very good."

"All the features come as part of a standard license."

"OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and analyze that information."

Cons

"Business process modelling could be improved."

"With the Excel importing, the "up to date" part is the challenge. If we had a real-time integration, we could keep things up to date for whatever kinds of change points we had. With Excel, it is more that you have to export from one system then import it to another, so it's better for data that doesn't change that often."

"The solution's integration capabilities with other tools in our system has not been all that well done. We have people who use ARIS, who use System Architect and, of course, Visio. erwin has very limited ways to import and export from those kinds of tools. It's not a very easy thing to do."

"If it had fewer features to model all kinds of architecture, it would be less complicated."

"Add some ability to do conditional Visualization on the models and in reports (some ideas) – maybe as a specialized Theme or Diagram or Display."

"I would like to see an improvement in the output of the solution."

"What they need to do is to consolidate more of their products. For example, I was just looking and I couldn't figure out what erwin DT is. It's on the website but it would help if they could put information together and make it more clear as to what products they have and how they work with other things."

"I feel that the UML drawing capability needs to be improved."

More erwin Evolve by Quest cons

"OpenText ProVision's collaboration management is quite complicated and difficult to use."

"Lacks the ability to have your own in-house developments."

"Integrating with or interfacing with other tools like data management tools would be very helpful."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I estimate that we pay between $40,000 and $50,000 a year for the solution, not including the upfront costs to buy things the first time."

"The licensing enables you to differentiate between people who edit the content and the people who consume it. We are able to keep the licensing costs down by keeping the "contributor" licenses to a minimum, and we then just roll out the content in a read-only version for the rest of our users."

"The cost is something like $15,000, per license. But I haven't looked at those numbers in three years. It was over $100,000 to initially set everything up and get it all configured."

"Yearly, our cost is €100,000."

"I think erwin is quite expensive. I have difficulty selling the portal, in fact."

"Unless you are a one person shop – always go with the Workgroup edition and Concurrent licensing."

"On a yearly basis, our licensing costs are 50,000 euro. There are no additional costs because we are on a SaaS model."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

19%

Energy/Utilities Company

14%

Construction Company

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What advice do you have for others considering erwin Evolve?

I rate erwin Evolve by Quest a nine out of ten.

See all answers

What do you like most about erwin Evolve by Quest?

We can efficiently deploy business models into the databases and generate SQL scripts.

See all answers

What needs improvement with erwin Evolve by Quest?

erwin Evolve by Quest could have additional features to manage the architecture of enterprises and businesses.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs erwin Evolve by Quest

Compared 23% of the time

LeanIX vs erwin Evolve by Quest

Compared 17% of the time

SAP PowerDesigner vs erwin Evolve by Quest

Compared 12% of the time

ARIS BPA vs erwin Evolve by Quest

Compared 10% of the time

Avolution ABACUS vs erwin Evolve by Quest

Compared 9% of the time

More erwin Evolve by Quest Competitors

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs OpenText ProVision

Compared 100% of the time

More OpenText ProVision Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

erwin Evolve by Quest

June 2025

Download erwin Evolve by Quest product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

May 2025

Download OpenText ProVision product report

Also Known As

erwin EA, erwin Business Process, erwin Enterprise Architecture

Metastorm ProVision

Overview

erwin is used by more than 50,000 professionals in 60+ countries to get big results from their enterprise data initiatives. erwin is the #1 choice in virtually every industry, from government and healthcare to retail and finance.

erwin Modeling provides a collaborative environment to manage enterprise data through an intuitive, graphical interface. With a centralized view of key data definitions, you can leverage information as a strategic asset and more efficiently manage your data resources to save time and money.

erwin by Quest

OpenTextâs MIM (formerly Metastorm Integration & Managed File Transfer) solution provides a single platform for you to manage both batch and real-time, system-based integrations and processes complete with an audit trail to ensure operational success. With OpenText MIM, your organization can: Track high volume transaction and data transfers and file content from a centralized dashboard Ensure corporate data and auditing compliance requirements Enhance agility and visibility into end-to-end process activities at the system, data and human interaction levels Tie legacy systems into new SOA environments Simplify interactions with your existing legacy systems and data by integrating them into your improved business processes

OpenText

Sample Customers

AT&T, Bank of America, Chevron, Duke University, ESPN, Fidelity, GE, JP Morgan Chase, KPMG, McGraw Hill, NASA, Pfizer, Royal Bank of Scotland, Teradata, Union Pacific, Vodafone, Wells Fargo.

Delta Technology, Export Development Canada, Rompetrol, Salt River Project, AMEC, U.S. Air Force, HP Consulting & Integration

Buyer's Guide

OpenText ProVision vs. erwin Evolve by Quest

June 2025

Free Report: OpenText ProVision vs. erwin Evolve by Quest

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText ProVision vs. erwin Evolve by Quest and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText ProVision vs. erwin Evolve by Quest report.

See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.