Immuta vs erwin Data Intelligence by Quest comparison

erwin by Quest and Immuta are both solutions in the Data Governance category. erwin by Quest is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.2, while Immuta is ranked #24 with an average rating of 7.5. erwin by Quest holds a 2.2% mindshare in DG, compared to Immuta’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of erwin by Quest users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Immuta users who would recommend it.

erwin Data Intelligence by ...

Read 18 erwin Data Intelligence by Quest reviews

3,571 Views
939 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Immuta

Read 4 Immuta reviews

662 Views
470 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

erwin Data Intelligence by ...

Immuta

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Erwin Data Intelligence and Immuta compete in the data governance and security domain. Erwin offers a comprehensive suite with appealing pricing and support, while Immuta is superior in privacy and compliance features, justifying its higher investment.

Features: Erwin Data Intelligence includes data mapping, data lineage, and governance capabilities. These features allow organizations to efficiently manage and annotate data. It also provides automated data classification and data quality checks. Immuta offers dynamic access control, automated privacy technologies, and role-level security. It focuses on simplifying data compliance and ensuring sensitive data is properly handled.

Room for Improvement: Erwin could enhance its data documentation capabilities in user interfaces. Simplifying the system for non-technical users might increase accessibility. Better navigation and search functionalities can benefit extensive data catalogs. Immuta could improve in streamlining policy configuration processes. Enhancing integration capabilities with other data management tools and processes would be beneficial. Providing more user-friendly deployment options is essential for broad user adoption.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Erwin Data Intelligence offers user-friendly deployment and efficient customer service, ensuring smooth integration with existing systems. Immuta emphasizes cloud-based deployment, offering comprehensive support for configuring tailored policies and access controls, which may require more setup effort.

Pricing and ROI: Erwin Data Intelligence offers competitive pricing with strong ROI due to its comprehensive capabilities, leading to operational efficiencies. Immuta's higher setup costs are justified by its advanced compliance and privacy features, delivering significant ROI for organizations focused on stringent data governance standards.

To learn more, read our detailed Immuta vs. erwin Data Intelligence by Quest Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Immuta vs. erwin Data Intelligence by Quest

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

erwin Data Intelligence by ...

Ranking in Data Governance

9th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Immuta

Ranking in Data Governance

24th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Data Governance category, the mindshare of erwin Data Intelligence by Quest is 2.2%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Immuta is 1.5%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Governance

Featured Reviews

Roy Pollack

Advisor Application Architect at CPS Energy

The solution provides more profound insights into legacy data movements, lineages, and definitions in the short term.

We have loaded over 300,000 attributes and more than 1000 mappings. The performance is slow, depending on the lineage or search. This is supposed to be fixed in the later versions, but we haven't upgraded yet. The integration with various metadata sources, including erwin Data Modeler, isn't smooth in the current version. It took some experimentation to get things working. We hope this is improved in the newer version. The initial version we used felt awkward because Erwin implemented features from other companies into their offering.

Read full review

Saurav P

Big Data Engineer at Cognizant

A data governance management solution that helps to restrict sensitive information

We use the product for data governance management. It helps us to create policies and restrict sensitive data. The tool's most valuable feature is restriction. Immuta is behind in updating upgrades and software releases. I have been using the product for the last three years. Immuta is…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Being able to capture different business metrics and organize them in different catalogs is most valuable. We can organize these metrics into sales-related metrics, customer-related metrics, supply chain-related metrics, etc."

"Data Intelligence has provided more profound insights into legacy data movements, lineages, and definitions in the short term. We have linked three critical layers of data, providing us with an end-to-end lineage at the column level."

"We use the codeset mapping quite a bit to match value pairs to use within the conversion as well. Those value pair mappings come in quite handy and are utilized quite extensively. They then feed into the automation of the source data extraction, like the source data mapping of the source data extraction, the code development, forward engineering using the ODI connector for the forward automation."

"The data management is, obviously, key in understanding where the data is and what the data is. And the governance can be done at multiple levels. You have the governance of the code sets versus the governance of the business terms and the definitions of those business terms. You have the governance of the business data models and how those business data models are driving the physical implementation of the actual databases. And, of course, you have the governance of the mapping to make sure that source-to-target mapping is done and is being shared across the company."

"The possibility to write automation scripts is the biggest benefit for us. We have several products with metadata and metadata mapping capabilities. The big difference when we were choosing this product was the ability to run automation scripts against metadata and metadata mappings. Right now, we have a very high level of automation based on these automation scripts, so it's really the core feature for us."

"The interface is easy to use. I also like Erwin's automatic data classification and data quality checks."

"Overall, DI's data cataloging, data literacy, and automation have helped our decision-makers because when a source wants to change something, we immediately know what the impact is going to be downstream."

"Mind map... is a really good feature because it is very helpful in seeing which column's tables are related. Also, you can flag them with "sensitive data" and other indicators. You can also customize your own features for the mind map. That was another very robust feature."

More erwin Data Intelligence by Quest pros

"What I appreciate the most is its user-friendliness."

"The tool's most valuable feature is restriction."

"Instead of manually tagging data, Immuta’s auto-discovery capability identifies sensitive information, such as country labels, gender information, and other personal data."

"All features available are good."

Cons

"There are a lot of little things like moving between read screens and edit screens. Those little human interface type of programming pieces will need to mature a bit to make it easier to get to where you want to go to put the stuff in."

"The SDK behind this entire product needs improvement. The company really should focus more on this because we were finding some inconsistencies on the LDK level. Everything worked fine from the UI perspective, but when we started doing some deep automation scripts going through multiple API calls inside the tool, then only some pieces of it work or it would not return the exact data it was supposed to do."

"There was a huge learning curve, and I'd been in software development for most of my career. The application itself, and how it runs menus and screens when you can modify and code, is complex. I have found that kind of cumbersome."

"We still need another layer of data quality assessments on the source to see if it is sending us the wrong data or if there are some issues with the source data. For those things, we need a rule-based data quality assessment or scoring where we can assess tools or other technology stacks. We need to be able to leverage where the business comes in, defining some business rules and have the ability to execute those rules, then score the data quality of all those attributes. Data quality is definitely not what we are leveraging from this tool, as of today."

"One big improvement we would like to see would be the workflow integration of codeset mapping with the erwin source to target mapping. That's a bit clunky for us. The two often seem to be in conflict with one another. Codeset mappings that are used within the source to target mappings are difficult to manage because they get locked."

"The versioning can sometimes be confusing because we use the publishing feature for the mapping. Technical analysts sometimes have two versions, and they should know that the public version is the correct one."

"There is room for improvement with the data cataloging capability. Right now, there is a list of a lot of sources that they can catalog, or they can create metadata upon, but if they can add more then that would be a good plus for this tool."

"It's a little bit clunky. I think a lot of these features were bolted on, and they don't necessarily transition smoothly in the interface. I would like to see a little more cohesion."

More erwin Data Intelligence by Quest cons

"We have had some challenges with their support when we were migrating to the cloud version. We we had some issues, and it took us several attempts to get a proper responses as part of that migration."

"The implementation process with Immuta was quite challenging, primarily due to issues related to database handling and the syncing of user groups."

"Immuta is behind in updating upgrades and software releases."

"There is room for improvement in enhancing the monitoring capabilities."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing cost is around $7,000 for user. This is an estimation."

"erwin is cheaper than other solutions and this should appeal to other buyers. It has a good price tag."

"erwin was at a good price. The federal government wouldn't buy something if the pricing wasn't good."

"The solution is aggressively priced."

"We operate on a yearly subscription and because it is an enterprise license we only have one. It is not dependent on the number of users."

"There is an additional fee for the server maintenance."

"You buy a seat license for your portal. We have 100 seats for the portal, then you buy just the development licenses for the people who are going to put the data in."

"erwin's pricing was cheaper than its competitors."

More erwin Data Intelligence by Quest pricing and cost advice

"Immuta's pricing is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

22%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

Non Profit

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about erwin Data Intelligence by Quest?

The data mapping manager is the most valuable feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for erwin Data Intelligence by Quest?

The price is reasonable, and a subscription is required.

See all answers

What needs improvement with erwin Data Intelligence by Quest?

The data quality assessment requires third-party components and a separate license. I would like to have better integration around the data quality. I would appreciate the inclusion of a non-struct...

See all answers

What do you like most about Immuta?

All features available are good.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Immuta?

We have had some challenges with their support when we were migrating to the cloud version. We we had some issues, and it took us several attempts to get a proper responses as part of that migration.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Immuta?

Our use cases are for data access control and data access control provisioning. We also use it for roles and policies.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs erwin Data Intelligence by Quest

Compared 32% of the time

Collibra Governance vs erwin Data Intelligence by Quest

Compared 24% of the time

Alation Data Catalog vs erwin Data Intelligence by Quest

Compared 12% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs erwin Data Intelligence by Quest

Compared 10% of the time

Collibra Lineage vs erwin Data Intelligence by Quest

Compared 10% of the time

More erwin Data Intelligence by Quest Competitors

BigID vs Immuta

Compared 23% of the time

Privacera vs Immuta

Compared 18% of the time

Protegrity’s Data Protection Platform vs Immuta

Compared 17% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs Immuta

Compared 16% of the time

Cyera vs Immuta

Compared 11% of the time

More Immuta Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

erwin Data Intelligence by Quest

May 2025

Download erwin Data Intelligence by Quest product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Governance

April 2025

Download Immuta product report

Also Known As

erwin DG, erwin Data Governance

No data available

Overview

The erwin Data Intelligence Suite (erwin DI) combines data catalog and data literacy capabilities for greater awareness of and access to available data assets, guidance on their use, and guardrails to ensure data policies and best practices are followed. Automatically harvest, transform and feed metadata from a wide array of data sources, operational processes, business applications and data models into a central data catalog. Then make it accessible and understandable within context via role-based views. This complete metadata-driven approach to data governance facilitates greater IT and business collaboration.

erwin by Quest

Immuta ensures secure, controlled access to sensitive data, excelling in data governance, regulatory compliance, and privacy. Key features include dynamic policy enforcement, fine-grained access control, and seamless integration with diverse data sources. Users report improved operational efficiency and enhanced teamwork.

Immuta

Sample Customers

Oracle, Infosys, GSK, Toyota Motor Sales, HSBC

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Immuta vs. erwin Data Intelligence by Quest

April 2025

Free Report: Immuta vs. erwin Data Intelligence by Quest

Find out what your peers are saying about Immuta vs. erwin Data Intelligence by Quest and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Immuta vs. erwin Data Intelligence by Quest report.

See our list of best Data Governance vendors.

We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.