Entuity vs Statseeker comparison

Park Place Technologies and Techniche are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Park Place Technologies is ranked #40 with an average rating of 9.0, while Techniche is ranked #61 with an average rating of 7.0. Park Place Technologies holds a 0.6% mindshare in NMS, compared to Techniche’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Park Place Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Techniche users who would recommend it.

Entuity

Read 11 Entuity reviews

921 Views
486 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Statseeker

Read 38 Statseeker reviews

428 Views
163 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Entuity

Statseeker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Entuity and Statseeker are competing products in the network performance monitoring space. Based on comparisons, Statseeker has an edge in advanced features, while Entuity stands out in pricing and support, appealing to cost-conscious buyers despite Statseeker’s robust functionality.

Features: Entuity offers real-time monitoring, comprehensive analytics, and insightful network performance metrics. Statseeker stands out with rapid data collection, detailed reporting capabilities, and extensive feature depth.

Room for Improvement: Entuity could enhance integration options, expand its reporting features, and improve scalability for larger networks. Statseeker might benefit from more competitive pricing, a more intuitive user interface, and enhanced flexibility in data presentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Entuity is known for straightforward deployment and proactive customer service, ensuring quick issue resolution. Statseeker offers easy deployment and is recognized for responsive customer support, giving it a slight advantage.

Pricing and ROI: Entuity usually provides a competitive pricing structure focusing on high ROI, which is attractive to budget-sensitive buyers. Statseeker, despite higher initial costs, offers justified expense through its enhanced capabilities and long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Entuity vs. Statseeker Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Entuity vs. Statseeker

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,438 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Entuity

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

40th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Statseeker

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

61st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Entuity is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Statseeker is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Ahmed Salman

Performance & Monitoring Supervisor at Saudi Telecom Company

A good solution for network monitoring and support management, but there is no centralized database

There is no centralized database. It is an issue if you use a local database and have multiple borders. However, if you have an external database, you can keep the same old data from an old border up to 100 borders. In addition, if we want to create an ABI or use an ABI to connect data, there is no competition when we ask for support. If we want to modify the calculation matrix or equation, we have to raise a professional service. Other competitors like Micro Focus, a network management system, have a new supportability matrix in the market every quarter.

Read full review

John Elhariry

Team Leader at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

We can set up a dashboard to monitor the status of an entire site, which provides more insight into any issues across devices

One engineer is enough for the solution's maintenance. There has been a significant improvement in Statseeker in the last few versions. It includes a wallet map and features we plan to implement when deploying the latest or penultimate versions across all our sites. This will significantly assist in identifying sites surpassing thresholds or KPIs, making issue detection much more accessible. The threshold feature is handy for identifying delays and major outages. This graphical map enables us to quickly assess the scope of nationwide problems, allowing for swift action and efficient reporting to management and service providers. This tool facilitates monitoring by visualizing all network elements with their respective coordinates, highlighting any downtimes or issues through color-coded green for operational, orange for approaching thresholds, yellow for minor alarms, and red for critical issues. The tool is a monitoring tool that helps in identifying problems. It is necessary to have someone trained to set up the dashboards because they might require some programming or specific configuration skills. Once it's configured, it works well. It's not as straightforward as other tools where you plug in the device, and everything works. With Statseeker, you still need to put in some effort to set up your dashboard properly. It requires someone with good training and proficiency in setting up these dashboards. They can benefit the technical and operations teams, providing useful insights into the network and the executive management team to receive reports on the overall network health. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best thing about Entuity is that it's easy to use. It's user-friendly. It's intuitive and easy to customize as per your needs."

"Event management and the geographical Google API-based network topology are the most valuable features of Entuity."

"The initial setup of Entuity is easy and the full process took approximately 30 minutes."

"This is a product that is easy to deploy and maintain with a positive end-user experience."

"One of the most valuable features of Entuity is the user interface."

"We find the SurePath component of this solution to be very valuable, as it gives us the path to whatever we are configuring."

"The setup was very simple and took about an hour."

"I particularly like the theme and the dashboard that they have brought in this version. In the previous version, there was only a simple screen. There wasn't any dashboard. It was a simple view, but now, they have brought in a dashboard that gives the fields for the ops as well. They can get the data they want to see in a single place."

More Entuity pros

"We are now able to easily track where problems are with bandwidth and port errors, rather than having to do a lot of diagnostics."

"This solution provides us with a quicker response in troubleshooting."

"It is fairly simple and easy to use as an all-purpose network monitor."

"The most valuable features are scalability and reliability."

"It also allows us to predict the capacity on WAN circuits, as well as other circuits, to help us plan for upgrading."

"Summary Reports provide a quick way to identify where potential issues are. Drill-downs provide more granular details very quickly."

"The graphics and trends are the most valuable for us."

"The most valuable feature is the dashboard, where you have everything right there on the screen."

More Statseeker pros

Cons

"If we want to modify the calculation matrix or equation, we have to raise a professional service."

"Entuity can expand its coverage on monitoring VoIP solutions a little bit more."

"Entuity can improve the fetching of device configuration. The solution uses scripts and I could not understand them or find any recourses on the internet to learn about the language that is used in the script. It could be more user-friendly and the device configuration management could be enhanced."

"A typical user might want to see even more depth to the standard reporting and ease of integration."

"It should support IPAM or IP Address Management. When it comes to the network, IP Address Management is a feature for which we have to use a different solution. When we are managing networks, if IPAM also becomes a part of this, we do not have to look for a separate solution."

"Entuity could improve by having more integration because now network management is not a standalone solution. You have to integrate it with your network, applications, and everything else. We have to collect that information from those solutions or relevant managers. Additionally, the SLA dashboard should be improved."

"We would like the backup element of this solution to be improved as, at present, it is very limited and does not have much scope for customization."

"In the most recent versions, Entuity has removed the Explorer navigation feature. This was very useful, and Entuity would be improved by restoring it."

More Entuity cons

"It would be very nice to have the Cisco ACI option included in the regular license."

"There is a little bit of room to improve in the alerting section to give some more options there. It's all I can think of right now off the top of my head."

"I would like the ability to update the dashboard. I would also like the ability to access via an API. Then I could produce a dashboard that my C level can understand. This is just so they can go and refresh whenever they want to and see what things look like."

"I would like to see some layer two and layer three topology mappings, similar to what NNMi and SolarWinds presents."

"The inclusion of configuration management features and SIP links would improve this solution."

"It would be nice if they had twenty-four-hour technical support because we contact Australia and we have to wait for them to open."

"More private MIB object support, such as WAN optimisation performance and wireless, would be helpful."

"I would like to see more comprehensive reporting and alerting."

More Statseeker cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Entuity is not an expensive solution."

"We have 400 licenses and we are only using 150 licenses."

"It varies and depends on the quantity. It's worth the cost."

"Entuity's licensing is very highly-priced."

"It can be comparatively expensive but that is because it is comprehensive."

"We pay a yearly maintenance fee of approximately $40,000 USD."

"The yearly cost varies as per the number of devices being monitored. The cost for 25,000 devices is about $4500."

"Pricing is reasonable but licensing should unlimited."

"The licensing cost is yearly and it's $5,000 to $8,000, I think."

"When it came to selecting this solution, it came down to cost."

"It's probably $5K a year for the license."

"We pay somewhere between $5,000 and $8,000 yearly in licensing fees."

"Compared to other solutions such as Zabbix and AKiPS, this solution is very well priced."

More Statseeker pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Energy/Utilities Company

Financial Services Firm

University

Financial Services Firm

20%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Entuity?

Event management and the geographical Google API-based network topology are the most valuable features of Entuity.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Entuity?

We work with other solutions. We have a very good relationship with Entuity Commercial. You can negotiate discounts and provide better proposals to our customers. The pricing is very competitive. T...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Entuity?

Entuity could integrate with other solutions and collect more information from IoT devices.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Statseeker?

We are content with our current setup and its features. Additionally, we appreciate Statseeker's responsiveness to our queries and requests for improvements, particularly in monitoring. The upcomin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Statseeker?

There is a need for many developments to mature Statseeker. It should provide a study use case to show how it monitors the SD-WAN service.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Statseeker?

Statseeker provides the basic monitoring status of our network elements, including latency, ping delays, and ping drops. Its strengths lie in a couple of areas. Firstly, it is not an expensive tool...

See all answers

Comparisons

SolarWinds NPM vs Entuity

Compared 45% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Entuity

Compared 12% of the time

NetBrain vs Entuity

Compared 9% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Entuity

Compared 9% of the time

Motadata Network Management System vs Entuity

Compared 7% of the time

More Entuity Competitors

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Statseeker

Compared 100% of the time

More Statseeker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Entuity

June 2025

Download Entuity product report

Buyer's Guide

Statseeker

May 2025

Download Statseeker product report

Overview

Entuity network management software continually monitors network bandwidth, network error rate and network congestion, which are all factors that impact overall network throughput. Events can be raised in response to abnormal traffic to allow remedial action before users are impacted. The Entuity network monitor continually evaluates network latency and network jitter to calculate MOS and ICPIF scores. Events can be raised when these scores are unacceptable for business application, voice and video performance. Key Features include: Root Cause Analysis, Event Management, Flow Monitoring & Analysis, Application Path Monitoring and Network Performance Monitoring.

Park Place Technologies

Statseeker is the only network performance monitoring technology to seamlessly and successfully combine speed + scale + value. Statseeker is a global provider delivering innovative network monitoring solutions for the IT enterprise and OT industrial market space. With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Instant visibility: Installed in minutes, polls up to 1 million ports from a single server… reduce your time to repair. Powerful monitoring: Checks every port over entire network, every 60 seconds… low network consumption bandwidth. Fast reporting: Practical real-time dashboard, reports in seconds, instant alerts… maximize your up-time. Smart data: 100% network data, original granularity, never rolled up, never averaged… tune for peak performance, control CAPEX and OPEX.

Techniche

Sample Customers

Tait Communications, Vattenfall, Discovery, University of Minnesota, Pernod Ricard, Electric Car

With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Some example customers include: FedEx, Optus, Verizon, California State University, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Monash University, Texas A&M University.

Buyer's Guide

Entuity vs. Statseeker

June 2025

Free Report: Entuity vs. Statseeker

Find out what your peers are saying about Entuity vs. Statseeker and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Entuity vs. Statseeker report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.