ElectroNeek vs OpenText Operations Orchestration comparison

ElectroNeek and OpenText are both solutions in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category. ElectroNeek is ranked #37, while OpenText is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.5. ElectroNeek holds a 0.7% mindshare in RPA, compared to OpenText’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of ElectroNeek users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

ElectroNeek

Read 9 ElectroNeek reviews

897 Views
691 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

OpenText Operations Orchest...

Read 26 OpenText Operations Orchestration reviews

1,319 Views
303 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

ElectroNeek

OpenText Operations Orchest...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 4, 2024

OpenText Operations Orchestration and ElectroNeek are competing products in the automation space. OpenText Operations Orchestration has advantages in pricing and support, while ElectroNeek offers a robust feature set for advanced capabilities.

Features: OpenText Operations Orchestration is recognized for scalability, integration capabilities, and creating repeatable processes. Its automation simplifies IT operations across various domains. ElectroNeek provides an intuitive, user-friendly interface with robust RPA capabilities, unlimited bot deployment, and OCR features for efficient document processing.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Operations Orchestration could benefit from a simpler deployment process, reduced setup time, and improvements to its complex framework. ElectroNeek may enhance its advanced integration capabilities, expand training resources, and optimize its UI for greater efficiency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Operations Orchestration requires a complex setup but offers comprehensive support to mitigate this. ElectroNeek facilitates a faster, simpler deployment process and provides responsive support, making it advantageous for businesses with less technical overhead.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Operations Orchestration requires a higher initial investment but achieves good ROI through scalability. ElectroNeek offers a cost-effective setup with quicker ROI due to reduced deployment time and sustainable features, particularly benefiting smaller setups and specific markets.

To learn more, read our detailed ElectroNeek vs. OpenText Operations Orchestration Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ElectroNeek vs. OpenText Operations Orchestration

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ElectroNeek

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

37th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (23rd)

OpenText Operations Orchest...

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

21st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (24th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category, the mindshare of ElectroNeek is 0.7%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Operations Orchestration is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText Operations Orchestration	0.5%
ElectroNeek	0.7%
Other	98.8%

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

Featured Reviews

Sarath Gopinathan Nair

RPA Developer at DigiStaff

User-friendly, good UI, but does not work well with Microsoft Edge

We use the solution to automate processes such as the pay slips within the consol portal The solution is user-friendly with a really good UI and ID. The support is good. ElectroNeek has video recordings that enable us to easily automate tasks, and it includes a wide variety of activities. The…

Read full review

Ahmed Salman

Performance & Monitoring Supervisor at Saudi Telecom Company

Increases productivity with automation and robust orchestration capabilities

The community is very powerful, with extensive knowledge bases available. There are ready-made workflows, integration with other products, a nice user interface, and reporting. The tool is flexible, agent-based or agentless. It allows significant automation and has robust orchestration and reporting capabilities. It is easy to configure and use, leading to increased efficiency across our IT processes.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The cost is the best thing about ElectroNeek."

"We find the OCR feature very valuable, due to the corrector recognition that it provides; this is very useful for document processing."

"The product's setup is straightforward."

"My favorite feature is that you can have unlimited bots without having to buy more licenses. That's a powerful option for scalability."

"ElectroNeek was extremely easy to use, especially its UI was easy to navigate with limited training."

"The most valuable feature is the price."

"The product's initial setup phase was easy."

"The solution is user-friendly with a really good UI and ID."

More ElectroNeek pros

"The community is very powerful, with extensive knowledge bases available."

"It's very stable. If you ask me for the success rate metrics, it's more than 90% for both."

"In my environment, if I want to shut down all tools in one shot, I can create a workflow and run the workflow to shut down all tools in one go."

"It has reduced the time taken to go to market. In the past, we were struggling with building these integrations, but now the process has sped up and there is an added advantage of quick delivery. In addition, it is an agent-less solution, which provides more flexibility in terms of multiple options."

"The product is good functionality-wise. I am impressed with the tool's flexibility in customization."

Cons

"I think that this solution could improve remote desktop interactions."

"ElectroNeek comes with three activities and we cannot add activities like we can with uiPADs."

"The solution needs to improve its stability."

"The solution works well with Google Chrome, but not with Microsoft Edge, which is the browser we use for automation."

"When I wanted to use web scraping for tables in web applications, I found through online forums that such functionality or activity is currently not working as it shows."

"The pricing is an area with a shortcoming, and from an improvement perspective, it needs to be made cheaper."

"The integrating capability of the product needs to be improved, to ensure that it works with all systems involved in a process."

"Its price could definitely be lower."

More ElectroNeek cons

"Only the tool's support can be a drawback where improvements are needed."

"The tool's UI needs to be improved. It needs to have better administration features in future releases."

"The price is an area that should be addressed because the price is high."

"I would prefer the addition of ready-made workflows for common scenarios such as Oracle database switchovers or Exchange server scenarios."

"There were a lot of scalability issues that we initially faced. Whenever I tried to deploy 100-200 endpoints, it became a huge challenge. We had to actually start using other tools like Tivoli Endpoint Management in order to patch the issues."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I believe we had a Silver Membership or something similar annually."

"My company has made a payment towards the purchase of a license from ElectorNeek."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing a seven."

"I give the price an eight out of ten."

"It's very affordable and the licensing is billed on a yearly basis."

"Its price could definitely be lower. Its licensing is on a yearly basis. There is no additional cost to the standard licensing fees."

"The cost is very high compared to anything else available."

"I do not have experience with the pricing or licensing of the product."

"The tool is expensive. I rate the tool a six if one is cheap and ten is very expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

13%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

20%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	20

Questions from the Community

RPA that Bots can run without centralized control?

Yea there are. For example Electroneek.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Operations Orchestration?

The pricing is medium, and the automation helps in cost and time savings, resulting in substantial value for money.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Operations Orchestration?

I would prefer the addition of ready-made workflows for common scenarios such as Oracle database switchovers or Exchange server scenarios. This would save time by not starting from scratch each time.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Operations Orchestration?

This tool serves as a central management hub, allowing seamless control of various IT processes via one console. I rate this solution eight out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

UiPath Platform vs ElectroNeek

Compared 38% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs ElectroNeek

Compared 22% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs ElectroNeek

Compared 14% of the time

Robocorp vs ElectroNeek

Compared 14% of the time

BotFarm vs ElectroNeek

Compared 13% of the time

More ElectroNeek Competitors

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs OpenText Operations Orchestration

Compared 15% of the time

Perpetuuiti Platform vs OpenText Operations Orchestration

Compared 13% of the time

ServiceNow Orchestration vs OpenText Operations Orchestration

Compared 10% of the time

Control-M vs OpenText Operations Orchestration

Compared 9% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs OpenText Operations Orchestration

Compared 8% of the time

More OpenText Operations Orchestration Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

December 2025

Download ElectroNeek product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Operations Orchestration

January 2026

OpenText Operations Orchestration report

Download OpenText Operations Orchestration product report

Also Known As

ElectroNeek RPA

Micro Focus Operations Orchestration, Operations Orchestration, HPOO, HPE Operations Orchestration

Overview

ElectroNeek is an Intelligent Automation Platform transforming business process management in enterprises by integrating AI bots with employee workflows, automating routines, and helping humans to focus on more creative and strategic tasks. ElectroNeek provides a wide range of exciting low-code automation tools based on RPA, IDP, AI and GPT-4 (Conversational and Generative) technologies.

ElectroNeek

OpenText Operations Orchestration (OO) automates, integrates, and orchestrates any IT process, on cloud or off. Automate using low-code/no-code workflow authoring options. Integrate with an API rich, extensible platform. Centrally orchestrate powerful, scalable workflows.

With OO you can automate and orchestrate infrastructure automation and IT processes from service fulfillment to incident remediation, cloud service delivery, and disaster recovery.

Operations Orchestration offers the tools needed to provide enterprise wide orchestration capabilities:

Design automation workflows with a low-code/no-code designer canvas, content library, and API generator wizards.
Govern your automation in one place and centrally orchestrate powerful, scalable workflows in large, high availability environments.
Schedule workflows and make sure that SLAs are met and workflows execution happens when you need it.
Expose REST APIs to programmatically invoke orchestration from any external source.
Automate difficult interfaces with RPA robots that mimic screen based human actions.
Follow business and operational metrics to understand the value and the health of your orchestration environment.
Expose orchestration scenarios as services to your end users in an easy to use Self-Service catalog.

Operations Orchestration offers the following components:

OpenText

Sample Customers

UFP, Clariant, Ricoh, FMBCapital, RePower

Casablanca INT, Internet Initiative Japan, Railway Information Systems, Samsung SDS, and Turkcell.

Buyer's Guide

ElectroNeek vs. OpenText Operations Orchestration

December 2025

Free Report: ElectroNeek vs. OpenText Operations Orchestration

Find out what your peers are saying about ElectroNeek vs. OpenText Operations Orchestration and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ElectroNeek vs. OpenText Operations Orchestration report.

See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.

We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.