ElectroNeek vs Nintex RPA comparison

ElectroNeek and Nintex are both solutions in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category. ElectroNeek is ranked #37, while Nintex is ranked #23 with an average rating of 6.5. ElectroNeek holds a 0.7% mindshare in RPA, compared to Nintex’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of ElectroNeek users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Nintex users who would recommend it.

ElectroNeek

Read 9 ElectroNeek reviews

897 Views
691 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Nintex RPA

Read 30 Nintex RPA reviews

1,919 Views
1,861 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

ElectroNeek

Nintex RPA

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 4, 2024

Nintex RPA and ElectroNeek compete in the RPA market, each offering unique propositions. ElectroNeek may have the upper hand for smaller enterprises due to its cost-efficient unlimited bot deployment.

Features: Nintex RPA offers a drag-and-drop interface, robust integration across platforms, and efficient error handling. ElectroNeek provides the ability to deploy unlimited bots, cost-effectiveness, and a user-friendly interface.

Room for Improvement: Nintex RPA could improve AI integration, expand its library of connectors, and enhance mobile accessibility. ElectroNeek needs to enhance browser compatibility, particularly with Microsoft Edge, and improve remote desktop interactions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nintex RPA offers deployment options such as On-premises, Public Cloud, and Hybrid Cloud, with strong support. ElectroNeek offers ease of setup and scalability with a flexible licensing model, also known for responsive technical support.

Pricing and ROI: Nintex RPA has competitive pricing with shareable license options but can be costly for some. It promises improved process quality and efficiency. ElectroNeek's pricing is highly affordable, appealing to startups with no extra costs for additional bots, ensuring cost-efficiency for smaller businesses.

To learn more, read our detailed ElectroNeek vs. Nintex RPA Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ElectroNeek vs. Nintex RPA

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ElectroNeek

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

37th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (23rd)

Nintex RPA

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

23rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category, the mindshare of ElectroNeek is 0.7%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nintex RPA is 2.0%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Nintex RPA	2.0%
ElectroNeek	0.7%
Other	97.3%

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

Featured Reviews

Sarath Gopinathan Nair

RPA Developer at DigiStaff

User-friendly, good UI, but does not work well with Microsoft Edge

We use the solution to automate processes such as the pay slips within the consol portal The solution is user-friendly with a really good UI and ID. The support is good. ElectroNeek has video recordings that enable us to easily automate tasks, and it includes a wide variety of activities. The…

Read full review

JonathanNg

Global Automation Lead - Customer Operations at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees

Helped us identify areas where frontline staff aren't following standard procedures or using unexpected systems, giving us better insight into our end users' workflows

To analyze and make sense of the data generated by Kryon process discovery can be a lot of effort. It's not as automatic as some might think. It really depends on how many processes you have and how actively you use them. But the scalability aspect isn't necessarily about deployment or technical maintenance. It's really about how you analyze and gain insights from the data gathering. I'd rate the scalability a seven out of ten because the solution has been scaling well for a long time. It's very easy to deploy. But getting value out of it at scale can be a challenge, just like with any deployment. We use it mainly for process discovery. We actually proceed it from different teams. So, we have 15 licenses that we rotate with different people, actually through different teams. So, we do discovery for the online team; we gather the results after about two weeks to a month. We analyze those results, and then we deploy them again on the analytics team. We regularly deploy it to different teams. So, it's in constant use. It just runs on the systems through discovery mode most of the time.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is user-friendly with a really good UI and ID."

"We find the OCR feature very valuable, due to the corrector recognition that it provides; this is very useful for document processing."

"The cost is the best thing about ElectroNeek."

"The drag and drop feature, which is no code, is very useful for me because I am not a technical person. It is very user-friendly."

"The most valuable feature is the price."

"The product's setup is straightforward."

"The product's initial setup phase was easy."

"ElectroNeek was extremely easy to use, especially its UI was easy to navigate with limited training."

More ElectroNeek pros

"The bot is typically about twice as fast as a person and more accurate, as long as the data going in is good. That is the biggest advantage."

"Kryon RPA is very stable - we've not had many disruptions, and the product is updated regularly."

"It has been helpful in reducing the manpower and error rate since we are able to run tasks 24/7 without interruptions. As humans definitely take breaks and there may be absenteeism that is unexpected, the solution provides continuous work. Humans tend to make errors once in a while, but the solution has almost zero percent errors."

"We have been using Kryon Process Discovery for about a year now. With our initial tests and monitoring just a couple people, we were able to identify 79 possible use cases within a one-month period."

"The task mining aspect has been the most valuable for us. That's why we actually bought it."

"The advanced Excel functionalities are really convenient because we work a lot with spreadsheets. It’s also easy to use the HTML selectors. It’s just a click and it picks it up. There’s not a lot of no hard-coding with it."

"Troubleshooting and debugging could be improved. It's missing a proper debugger. It's very difficult, based on the log files and the fact that it doesn't have a proper debugger, to troubleshoot issues. It will sometimes end with no indication as to why it ended and it becomes a bit of trial and error."

"The recording capability is valuable because of the amount of data it captures automatically. It's quite good. It means less development, and fewer configuration settings to fill in after you're done."

More Nintex RPA pros

Cons

"When I wanted to use web scraping for tables in web applications, I found through online forums that such functionality or activity is currently not working as it shows."

"Its price could definitely be lower."

"It's not applicable to very large enterprises and for difficult work or more complex processes."

"The integrating capability of the product needs to be improved, to ensure that it works with all systems involved in a process."

"The solution needs to improve its stability."

"I think that this solution could improve remote desktop interactions."

"The solution works well with Google Chrome, but not with Microsoft Edge, which is the browser we use for automation."

"The pricing is an area with a shortcoming, and from an improvement perspective, it needs to be made cheaper."

More ElectroNeek cons

"The only unstable part is Studio where you build this stuff. In our version, the 5.25. It has a memory leak. If you leave it open for too long, eventually it just freezes. Saving your work, closing, and opening it just once a day is all it takes. However, this is a bug that I have noticed about the stability of the actual tool."

"The product requires some more time in development. It still has some bugs and some things to work out. They're constantly releasing. They need to continue working out the general issues of using the product at scale, first and foremost."

"I would like to see a better OCR solution. That's the main thing: identifying unstructured data, like all paper documents and data from pictures."

"With the customer support, there have been some times where we have had to go through explaining the issue a couple times because it has gone through a couple of people's hands. There have been a couple of scenarios where we have had to re-explain the issue and bring somebody new up to speed on what is going on or what the problem is."

"From our experience, the product is not suitable for end users."

"What we are lacking is OCR, the ability to read text. We would like it to have the ability to take a page which is free text and analyze it, and then for the robot to know what to do next. This ability does not exist in Kryon products."

"Kryon could be easier to use, especially in comparison to UiPath."

"Kryon RPA's integration with other solutions could be more seamless."

More Nintex RPA cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's very affordable and the licensing is billed on a yearly basis."

"My company has made a payment towards the purchase of a license from ElectorNeek."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing a seven."

"I believe we had a Silver Membership or something similar annually."

"Its price could definitely be lower. Its licensing is on a yearly basis. There is no additional cost to the standard licensing fees."

"I give the price an eight out of ten."

"The price is affordable."

"We're paying in the neighborhood of about $66,000 a year. The cost is fairly similar to its competitors' costs. It might have been a little bit more reasonable than the others, and that cost was with Process Discovery in addition."

"Kryon is slightly more expensive compared to UiPath."

"Compared to its competitors, Kryon RPA's pricing is very competitive."

"They license per robot and we have 25 robots. You get so many robot licenses and can allocate those licenses to either attended, unintended, or Process Discovery bots. If you have 25 licenses, for example, you could have 20 automation bots and five process discovery. This allocation is flexible. There are also maintenance costs."

"We have a yearly license. It's about $5,000 per year."

"We have been able to alleviate two FTEs, which was a big savings for us. We were able to reuse those resources in other locations. It is over 5000 hours a year in total savings."

"We've more than broken even over on the license. Year to date, we are at $120,000 in savings."

More Nintex RPA pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

13%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	18

Questions from the Community

RPA that Bots can run without centralized control?

Yea there are. For example Electroneek.

See all answers

Best RPA tools for IBM iSeries

We have found that Foxtrot (Now NintexRPA) is a very solid solution for IBM iSeries integration using the IBM ACS 5250 emulator, in addition Datamatics TruBot is an alternative solution.

See all answers

What do you like most about Nintex RPA?

Nintex RPA often includes security features, including encryption and user access controls, which ensure the protection of sensitive data and compliance with security standards.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nintex RPA?

Although Nintex RPA is expensive, it is somewhat affordable considering its features. I would rate the cost aspect as an eight out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

UiPath Platform vs ElectroNeek

Compared 38% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs ElectroNeek

Compared 22% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs ElectroNeek

Compared 14% of the time

Robocorp vs ElectroNeek

Compared 14% of the time

BotFarm vs ElectroNeek

Compared 13% of the time

More ElectroNeek Competitors

Fortra's Automate vs Nintex RPA

Compared 18% of the time

UiPath Platform vs Nintex RPA

Compared 15% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs Nintex RPA

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vs Nintex RPA

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs Nintex RPA

Compared 8% of the time

More Nintex RPA Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

December 2025

Download ElectroNeek product report

Buyer's Guide

Nintex RPA

January 2026

Download Nintex RPA product report

Also Known As

ElectroNeek RPA

Kryon RPA

Overview

ElectroNeek is an Intelligent Automation Platform transforming business process management in enterprises by integrating AI bots with employee workflows, automating routines, and helping humans to focus on more creative and strategic tasks. ElectroNeek provides a wide range of exciting low-code automation tools based on RPA, IDP, AI and GPT-4 (Conversational and Generative) technologies.

ElectroNeek

Using Nintex RPA, enterprises can leverage trained bots to quickly and cost-effectively automate routine tasks without the use of code in an easy-to-use drag and drop interface. Users are now equipped with a comprehensive, enterprise-grade process management and automation solution that streamlines processes fueled by both structured and unstructured data sources.

Nintex

Sample Customers

UFP, Clariant, Ricoh, FMBCapital, RePower

Amazon, Audi, Chevron, Toyota, Uber, Walmart

Buyer's Guide

ElectroNeek vs. Nintex RPA

December 2025

Free Report: ElectroNeek vs. Nintex RPA

Find out what your peers are saying about ElectroNeek vs. Nintex RPA and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ElectroNeek vs. Nintex RPA report.

See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.

We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.