

IBM Security QRadar and Elastic Observability compete in the cybersecurity and log analytics category. Elastic Observability appears to have the upper hand due to its cost-effectiveness and flexibility.
Features: IBM Security QRadar offers robust data enrichment, predefined connectors, and correlation rules that allow quick customization and real-time alerts. Elastic Observability is known for its open architecture, flexible visualization, and centralized logging, making it appealing for comprehensive monitoring.
Room for Improvement: IBM Security QRadar needs improvements in custom actions scripting and should incorporate more playbook design features, as well as address challenges with log source integration. Elastic Observability could enhance its predictive analytics, handling of on-prem devices, and ease-of-use to combat steep learning curves.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Security QRadar supports both on-premises and hybrid cloud deployments and offers flexibility in infrastructure choices, though it becomes complex with its feature set. Its technical support could improve in responsiveness and expertise. Elastic Observability is adaptable to on-premises and cloud environments; its support is generally satisfactory but could be more responsive.
Pricing and ROI: IBM Security QRadar is perceived as expensive, especially with its licensing complexity based on events per second. Despite the cost, it is considered valuable over time. Elastic Observability boasts a straightforward pricing model, often viewed as cost-effective with its open-source elements. Users find the cost balance appealing for scalability.
Elastic Observability has saved us time as it's much easier to find relevant pieces across the system in one screen compared to our own software, and it has saved resources too since the same resources can use less time.
With SOAR, the workflow takes one minute or less to complete the analysis.
AWS gives the chance to implement a solution out of the box with use cases that are already in IBM Security QRadar.
Investing this amount was very much worth it for my organization.
Elastic support really struggles in complex situations to resolve issues.
Their excellent documentation typically helps me solve any issues I encounter.
They assist with advanced issues, such as hardware or other problems, that are not part of standard operations.
Support needs to understand the issue first, then escalate it to the engineering team.
The support is really good; for instance, if a critical ticket is submitted, you will get paged right away as it gets logged, and their analyst will look into it, letting you know as soon as possible so you can work on it.
I rate the scalability of Elastic Observability as a ten, as we have never seen issues even with a lot of data coming in from more customers, provided we have the appropriate configuration.
Elastic Observability is easy in deployment in general for small scale, but when you deploy it at a really large scale, the complexity comes with the customizations.
For EPS license, if you increase or exceed the EPS license, you cannot receive events.
There are some bugs that come with each release, but they are keen always to build major versions and minor versions on time, including the CVE vulnerabilities to fix it.
I would rate the stability of Elastic Observability as a ten, as we don't experience any issues.
On cloud, you don't see any disconnections or instability.
I think QRadar is stable and currently satisfies my needs.
The product has been stable so far.
For instance, if you have many error logs and want to create a rule with a custom query, such as triggering an alert for five errors in the last hour, all you need to do is open the AI bot, type this question, and it generates an Elastic query for you to use in your alert rules.
It lacked some capabilities when handling on-prem devices, like network observability, package flow analysis, and device performance data on the infrastructure side.
Some areas such as AI Ops still require data scientists to understand machine learning and AI, and it doesn't have a quick win with no-brainer use cases.
We receive logs from different types of devices and need a way to correlate them effectively.
If AI-related support can suggest rules and integrate with existing security devices like MD, IPS, this SIM can create more relevant rules.
IBM Security QRadar does not support Canvas, so we had to create custom scripts and workarounds to pull logs from Canvas.
Observability is actually cheaper compared to logs because you're not indexing huge blobs of text and trying to parse those.
Many customers struggle to understand their total cost of ownership because Elastic licensing is not dependent on easy, quantifiable metrics such as number of users or amount of data.
Splunk is more expensive than IBM Security QRadar.
It was costly mainly because of the value you can get right now compared to other solutions.
It depends on how much you want to spend.
the most valued feature of Elastic is its log analytics capabilities.
Every integration, whether for Windows or Linux or even Palo Alto or Fortinet, installs the out-of-the-box dashboards along with it, making it easy to parse incoming data meaningfully and immediately start viewing dashboards to see what's happening in the platform.
The best features of Elastic Observability are their flexibility to integrate with other existing systems and the ability to build a unified monitoring tool that can integrate with existing ones and end-to-end user journeys which require a lot of customizations.
Recently, I faced an incident, a cyber incident, and it was detected in real time.
IBM Security QRadar gives the opportunity to improve the time to market of the releases with a great evaluation of cybersecurity breaches.
Compared to ArcSight, Splunk, or any other SIEM tools where you need their processing language such as structured query language, SPL, and in Sentinel there is KQL query languages, IBM Security QRadar doesn't require reliance on query languages.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| IBM Security QRadar | 4.6% |
| Elastic Observability | 1.3% |
| Other | 94.1% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 16 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 93 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 39 |
| Large Enterprise | 107 |
Elastic Observability is known for its powerful search capabilities, central logging, and integration with cloud-native tasks. It enhances monitoring for applications and systems through its flexibility and machine learning features.
Elastic Observability is a robust tool offering end-to-end monitoring and performance analysis, widely utilized for application performance monitoring, centralized logging, and metrics collection. Kibana enables data visualization and connection of sources, while the platform aids in incident response with real-time insights. Despite its complex learning curve, limited customization, and licensing challenges, it remains valuable for businesses seeking to improve operational efficiency with additional support from log analytics and system automation.
What are the key features of Elastic Observability?A wide range of industries apply Elastic Observability for its capabilities in capturing significant data points to offer insights into business and technical performance. Its applications span log events, application monitoring, network protocol monitoring, and more, aiding in data-driven decision-making processes within sectors like IT, finance, and e-commerce.
IBM Security QRadar offers real-time threat detection, data correlation, and integration with third-party solutions, providing a user-friendly interface, scalability, and extensive reporting capabilities for SIEM needs.
IBM Security QRadar is designed for comprehensive security monitoring in diverse environments, aiding sectors like telecom and finance with advanced threat detection and breach management. It aggregates data and analyzes user behavior, while its customizable and out-of-the-box rules deliver robust security insights and vulnerability management. The platform seeks enhancements in integration, performance, and user interface, with a focus on AI and cloud service compatibility.
What are the most important features of IBM Security QRadar?Telecom, finance, and cloud-based industries implement IBM Security QRadar for threat detection, compliance, and security monitoring. It is deployed for log collection and correlation, user behavior analytics, and ensuring secure data transfer and incident management, focusing on compliance and anomaly detection.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.