Ekran System vs One Identity Privileged Access Suite for Unix comparison

Ekran System and One Identity are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. Ekran System is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.0, while One Identity is ranked #34. Ekran System holds a 0.5% mindshare in PAM, compared to One Identity’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Ekran System users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of One Identity users who would recommend it.

Ekran System

Read 1 Ekran System review

163 Views
86 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

One Identity Privileged Acc...

Read 3 One Identity Privileged Access Suite for Unix reviews

157 Views
85 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Ekran System

One Identity Privileged Acc...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Ekran System and One Identity Privileged Access Suite for Unix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, One Identity and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM).

To learn more, read our detailed Privileged Access Management (PAM) Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 855,156 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ekran System

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

23rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Activity Monitoring (4th)

One Identity Privileged Acc...

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

34th

Average Rating

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of Ekran System is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of One Identity Privileged Access Suite for Unix is 0.4%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

Andreas Lalos

Director of Professional Services at Besecure

Early threat detection and diverse OS support with enhanced security

Ekran System offers a lightweight solution that does not impact the systems where it is implemented. It provides rich metadata for monitored activities and includes threat analysis capabilities for early alerting and investigation of unauthorized actions. Additionally, it supports diverse operating systems and allows for monitoring and enforcement policies, like blocking actions for policy violations, and provides a retention of historical data in a lightweight format.

Read full review

Hicham Barnoussi

Managing Partner at Smpl ID

A reliable solution with great password and session management

The setup process depends on the environment of the customer. It's not dependent on the solution. For customers with normal use cases and scenarios, it's a straightforward implementation, but for a customer with more than one environment, they may have BeyondTrust in one environment and Safeguard in another one. When they want to consolidate later, there may be complications. It depends on the devices and assets they would like to have under their PAM solution. The standard time for implementation is four weeks. I rate the setup an eight out of ten. There needs to be a dedicated resource for maintenance.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It supports diverse operating systems and allows for monitoring and enforcement policies, like blocking actions for policy violations, and provides a retention of historical data in a lightweight format."

"The most valuable features are session and password management."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is that it is easy to use."

"Privileged Access Suite's best feature is it's straightforward to use."

Cons

"Ekran System could improve in terms of communication to the market, particularly after their rebranding as Shiteka."

"There is a new trend of not having any privileged users or accounts."

"Privileged Access Suite's interface could be better."

"Product management should be improved."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

855,156 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ekran System?

The business model has become more complex with changes in feature licensing, yet they provide affordable options, particularly with the standard edition, which doesn't charge for the management co...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ekran System?

Ekran System could improve in terms of communication to the market, particularly after their rebranding as Shiteka. The solution does not support other protocols beyond traditional monitoring chann...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ekran System?

The primary use case for Ekran System is third-party vendor monitoring and privileged access management monitoring. It is also used for privilege access management solutions.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Proofpoint Insider Threat Management vs Ekran System

Compared 32% of the time

WALLIX Bastion vs Ekran System

Compared 29% of the time

TSFactory RecordTS vs Ekran System

Compared 20% of the time

Teramind vs Ekran System

Compared 18% of the time

More Ekran System Competitors

ManageEngine PAM360 vs One Identity Privileged Access Suite for Unix

Compared 100% of the time

More One Identity Privileged Access Suite for Unix Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

User Activity Monitoring

May 2025

Download Ekran System product report

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

May 2025

One Identity Privileged Access Suite for Unix report

Download One Identity Privileged Access Suite for Unix product report

Overview

Get overall user activity tracking with this local, Telnet, and terminal session monitoring software. See any user session in your reports.

Set up advanced video logging for any actions performed with critical applications, data, and IT configuration.

Get platform-independent software to monitor computer activity for Windows, Linux, Citrix, and VMware environments.

Ekran System

The Privileged Access Suite for Unix is a one-stop shop for UNIX security that combines Active Directory bridge and root-delegation solutions in one console. It extends the authentication and authorization of Active Directory to UNIX, Linux, and Mac OS X users consolidating and unifying identities. Plus, it assigns individual accountability, enables least-privilege access and centralizes access reporting of the UNIX root account.

One Identity

Sample Customers

Deloitte, UPS, Seoul National University, KDN, Finat, Constitutional Court of Korea, Ukrsibbank

University of East Anglia, nForce Secure, dunnhumby

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

May 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, One Identity and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

855,156 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.