Eggplant Test vs Panaya Test Dynamix comparison

Keysight Technologies and Panaya are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. Keysight Technologies is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.3, while Panaya is ranked #19. Keysight Technologies holds a 3.6% mindshare in TMT, compared to Panaya’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Keysight Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Panaya users who would recommend it.

Eggplant Test

Read 19 Eggplant Test reviews

3,597 Views
504 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Panaya Test Dynamix

Read 4 Panaya Test Dynamix reviews

1,336 Views
347 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Eggplant Test

Panaya Test Dynamix

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Panaya Test Dynamix and Eggplant Test are both robust testing tools with distinct strengths. Eggplant Test seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced automation capabilities and ROI.

Features: Panaya Test Dynamix features intuitive workflow automation, extensive integration options, and enhanced overall testing efficiency. Eggplant Test excels with intelligent automation, a scriptless testing environment, and superior advanced features, contributing to higher user satisfaction.

Room for Improvement: Panaya Test Dynamix could benefit from enhanced reporting capabilities, a broader range of supported technologies, and improved performance speed. Eggplant Test requires improvements in faster performance, more comprehensive user documentation, and additional technical support resources.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Panaya Test Dynamix scores high for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Eggplant Test requires a more involved setup process but compensates with excellent ongoing support, slightly outperforming Panaya Test Dynamix in customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Panaya Test Dynamix is considered cost-effective with good ROI due to its quick implementation and broad functionality. Eggplant Test has a higher initial setup cost but users report significant ROI owing to its advanced automation and time-saving features, offering better long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Eggplant Test vs. Panaya Test Dynamix Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test vs. Panaya Test Dynamix

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

6.7

Eggplant Test automation cut testing time and costs, saving $75,000 per tester and achieving fast ROI with increased efficiency.

Sentiment score

5.0

Panaya Test Dynamix improved test efficiency, reduced manual efforts, and provided measurable benefits in productivity, cost-effectiveness, and resource allocation.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Eggplant Test report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Panaya Test Dynamix report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

7.5

Eggplant Test customer service is praised for quick, knowledgeable support, despite some time zone and coverage challenges.

Sentiment score

5.7

Users praise Panaya Test Dynamix customer service for prompt, knowledgeable, and efficient support with effective communication and problem-solving skills.

Eggplant Test offers 24x7 support.

Naresh Nathala

Practice Head - QA at IdeaBytes

I'm not impressed because it depends on the resolution of the screen, so I wouldn't highly recommend this tool.

Mirza Hussain

Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Eggplant Test report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Panaya Test Dynamix report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

5.5

Eggplant Test scales well and integrates strongly but faces challenges with licensing costs and performance slowdowns in large packs.

Sentiment score

6.7

Panaya Test Dynamix is praised for scalability, efficient test case management, integration, reliability, and performance under large workloads.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Eggplant Test report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Panaya Test Dynamix report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

6.1

Eggplant Test is praised for stability and responsive support but faces occasional crashes, latency, and high resource usage.

Sentiment score

7.8

Panaya Test Dynamix stands out for its stability, reliability, and efficient performance, excelling under heavy workflows and various conditions.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Eggplant Test report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Panaya Test Dynamix report

Room For Improvement

Eggplant Test struggles with usability, integration, setup issues, and outdated features, requiring improvements in performance, support, and accessibility.

Panaya Test Dynamix requires better customization, clearer error messages, improved performance, enhanced integration, easier navigation, and more comprehensive training resources.

For big problems and complex automation tasks, I would prefer UFT because it has more flexibility and is more effective.

Mirza Hussain

Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

The two-system architecture that we currently follow could be better replaced with a one-system architecture.

Naresh Nathala

Practice Head - QA at IdeaBytes

For more quotes and insights, download the Eggplant Test report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Panaya Test Dynamix report

Setup Cost

Eggplant Test is costly yet ideal for large enterprises, with execution-only licenses offering better cost-effectiveness than competitors.

Panaya Test Dynamix offers competitive, scalable, and cost-effective pricing with customizable packages to meet diverse organizational testing needs.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Eggplant Test report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Panaya Test Dynamix report

Valuable Features

Eggplant Test excels in cross-platform testing with AI-driven automation, simplifying processes and enhancing collaboration through modular scripts.

Users praise Panaya Test Dynamix for its automation, detailed reporting, ease of use, seamless integration, and efficient defect management.

It can auto-heal the test cases and suggest new paths for testing, enhancing our ability to automate end-to-end journeys across various applications.

Naresh Nathala

Practice Head - QA at IdeaBytes

It can integrate with GitHub, allowing you to work with DevOps pipelines, so whenever you make changes in GitHub, it runs and checks the smoke testing on the server.

Mirza Hussain

Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Eggplant Test report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Panaya Test Dynamix report

Categories and Ranking

Eggplant Test

Ranking in Test Management Tools

9th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (13th), Test Automation Tools (12th)

Panaya Test Dynamix

Ranking in Test Management Tools

19th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Defect Tracking (4th), Functional Testing Tools (21st), Regression Testing Tools (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of Eggplant Test is 3.6%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Panaya Test Dynamix is 3.0%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Management Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Eggplant Test	3.6%
Panaya Test Dynamix	3.0%
Other	93.4%

Test Management Tools

Featured Reviews

Mirza Hussain

Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Has required frequent manual adjustments due to screen resolution but supports simple automation with minimal effort

I would prefer more UFT because it has VB scripting capabilities. While Eggplant Test also has this feature, it's not very user-friendly. I prefer the features of UFT compared to Eggplant Test. When needing to do quick automation, I would prefer Eggplant Test, but otherwise, I would always choose UFT. It depends on the complexity of the tasks. For big problems and complex automation tasks, I would prefer UFT because it has more flexibility and is more effective. With Eggplant Test, if you have very low complexity automation, such as simple click sequences and validation, then it would be preferable; with more complexity, I would not recommend Eggplant Test.

Read full review

Alain Vanhaeght

IT Project leader at a construction company with 10,001+ employees

More than reliable, with satisfied results for our needs, and excellent testing options

For the moment we are looking to automated testing, and there today apparently it is not working well with the application we want to test. So we are using an application on a terminal server and some quirks make it challenging to make automatic testing. It would be nice to be able to test offline. What I mean by that is today most of the time things are in the cloud, but sometimes when we are in factories we do not have network access and we should be able to download a test script into our PCs and do the test offline. Once that is complete we can re-upload it when we again have a network connection.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

22%

Computer Software Company

12%

Retailer

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	14

No data available

Questions from the Community

How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?

Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Eggplant Manager?

The price of Eggplant Test is on the higher side, but the benefits it provides make it worth using.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Eggplant Manager?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Eggplant Test

Compared 18% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Eggplant Test

Compared 16% of the time

Qt Squish vs Eggplant Test

Compared 9% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Eggplant Test

Compared 7% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Eggplant Test

Compared 7% of the time

More Eggplant Test Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Panaya Test Dynamix

Compared 43% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs Panaya Test Dynamix

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Application Quality Management vs Panaya Test Dynamix

Compared 7% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs Panaya Test Dynamix

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Rational ClearQuest vs Panaya Test Dynamix

Compared 5% of the time

More Panaya Test Dynamix Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test

January 2026

Download Eggplant Test product report

Buyer's Guide

Test Management Tools

January 2026

Download Panaya Test Dynamix product report

Also Known As

Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence, Eggplant DAI, Eggplant Automation Cloud, Eggplant Manager, Eggplant Mobile, Eggplant Customer Experience Insights

No data available

Overview

Across every industry, digital transformation is top of mind. New methods of developing software are driving fast change, and test teams are feeling the pressure. Increasing demand to release faster while maintaining the highest levels of quality is making the testing process more complex and harder to scale.

With AI-powered testing, Eggplant’s test and automation intelligence delivers the coverage you need to optimize the user experience, speed up release cycles, and improve your quality assurance process. Discover a fast, secure, and easy-to-use solution that tests any kind of software on any platform or device.

Keysight Technologies

Panaya Test Dynamix makes it easy for large enterprises to test smarter and release faster, by gaining control and visibility of every aspect of their ERP testing wherever they are.

With SAP ERP testing holding unique challenges, Test Dynamix offers provides all test management and execution capabilities in a single place , with a business process-centered approach designed specifically for SAP and Oracle testing, risk-based testing and test automation, to ensure the most efficient and effective large-scale testing possible.

Panaya

Sample Customers

FUJIFILM Group, NEC Personal Computers

Over 3000 leading enterprises worldwide including SONY, NICE, NEC, Shiseido, DHL, ABB and Grupo Bimbo

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test vs. Panaya Test Dynamix

January 2026

Free Report: Eggplant Test vs. Panaya Test Dynamix

Find out what your peers are saying about Eggplant Test vs. Panaya Test Dynamix and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Eggplant Test vs. Panaya Test Dynamix report.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.