Eggplant Test vs Ranorex Studio comparison

Keysight Technologies and Ranorex are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Keysight Technologies is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.3, while Ranorex is ranked #16. Keysight Technologies holds a 4.0% mindshare in TAt, compared to Ranorex’s 4.4% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Keysight Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Ranorex users who would recommend it.

Eggplant Test

Read 19 Eggplant Test reviews

3,466 Views
2,253 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Ranorex Studio

Read 46 Ranorex Studio reviews

2,913 Views
2,476 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Eggplant Test

Ranorex Studio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Ranorex Studio and Eggplant Test compete in automation testing. While both offer strong features, Ranorex Studio has an upper hand due to its superior code control and customization with C#, appealing to more technical users.

Features: Ranorex Studio offers C# code control, an easy test recording and execution interface, and comprehensive element recognition. It also benefits from robust support forums and cross-platform capabilities. Eggplant Test provides strong OCR technology, AI-driven automation, and image recognition, enhancing versatility across various platforms.

Room for Improvement: Ranorex Studio needs to improve support for non-Windows systems, enhance coding interface flexibility, and strengthen compatibility with non-.NET applications. Eggplant Test could improve in user-friendliness, integration with external tools, and expand support for more programming languages.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ranorex Studio supports on-premises deployment with reliable customer support praised for responsiveness. It encourages community support benefits. Eggplant Test offers both on-premises and cloud deployment, providing similar customer service levels but faces licensing complexities.

Pricing and ROI: Ranorex Studio is considered expensive, utilizing a licensing model that offers flexibility and good ROI by reducing manual regression efforts. Eggplant Test is more expensive, targeting larger enterprises with its robust features. Its ROI is enhanced through saving manual testing hours and flexible licensing. Some users appreciate Eggplant’s support-inclusive pricing model.

To learn more, read our detailed Eggplant Test vs. Ranorex Studio Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test vs. Ranorex Studio

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,008 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Eggplant Test

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (9th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (13th)

Ranorex Studio

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

16th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (19th), Mobile App Testing Tools (10th), Regression Testing Tools (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Eggplant Test is 4.0%, up from 3.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ranorex Studio is 4.4%, down from 5.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Eggplant Test	4.0%
Ranorex Studio	4.4%
Other	91.6%

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Mirza Hussain

Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Has required frequent manual adjustments due to screen resolution but supports simple automation with minimal effort

I would prefer more UFT because it has VB scripting capabilities. While Eggplant Test also has this feature, it's not very user-friendly. I prefer the features of UFT compared to Eggplant Test. When needing to do quick automation, I would prefer Eggplant Test, but otherwise, I would always choose UFT. It depends on the complexity of the tasks. For big problems and complex automation tasks, I would prefer UFT because it has more flexibility and is more effective. With Eggplant Test, if you have very low complexity automation, such as simple click sequences and validation, then it would be preferable; with more complexity, I would not recommend Eggplant Test.

Read full review

Aws V

IT Team Leader -Automation Manager at Citco

Good data security, allowing local installations to prevent data from going to the internet

There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman. Additionally, expanding language support beyond C#, Java, and JavaScript to include Python would be beneficial. An AI feature that automatically detects automation object properties and suggests actions would be a great addition. So, in future releases, AI solutions for automated property identification would be helpful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Good text reading ability."

"The main feature of Eggplant Test is that it can do fully automated web testing and app testing."

"It provides very strong cross-platform support."

"The features that we like the most are the developer interface and the ability to quickly develop and deploy tests."

"The most valuable features would be the image recognition and the OCR."

"The solution is a stable one."

"DAI's newest release allows us to test via scripts rather than models, because we have done 95 percent of our development in functional, not through modeling. I am really happy that then we can use the controller to run scripts rather than having to translate things to models. There are lots of options."

"The biggest advantage has been the ability to improve the quality significantly."

More Eggplant Test pros

"Code Conversion is one of the great features because sometimes, the automation tool doesn't have the capability of maneuvering around two specific evaluations."

"The solution is stable."

"Support is very quick. You can write to them and on the same day, they will respond. This is one of the best features."

"Object identification is good."

"I'm from a UFT background, so Ranorex Studio has a similar feel in terms of how it handles objects. It just felt familiar even though I'd never seen it before. However, it doesn't have all the bells and whistles of UFT, but it's a pretty good start, and it's cost-effective."

"The solution is fast and includes built-in libraries that record and playback."

"The scalability is very good. It's probably one of the better tools I've seen on the market."

"Easy integration with CI Tools like Jenkins, TFS, and TeamCity."

More Ranorex Studio pros

Cons

"Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence could improve by lowering the price."

"It has low productivity."

"In terms of additional features, it would be helpful to have one package for all testing. You have the manager, the AI, then you have functional, and about 10 different packages for installing."

"The execution times are a little slower, and the two-system architecture that we currently follow could be better replaced with a one-system architecture."

"They need to update the Linux. I think it's kind of an outdated Java Swing application."

"I would like to see standardized actions already built into Eggplant. For example, "wait eight seconds". That way, I wouldn't need to create it as an action. Right now, I have to program that wait and describe it as an action so that everybody knows it is an action that waits eight seconds... That way, somebody who is not familiar with programming processes like "if-else", or "for", or "while", would be able, from the first moment, and without programming, to put some easy-to-use, standardized, actions in place."

"The IDE could be even more full-featured. Because I was a developer, I was very spoiled by either Visual Studio Code or Visual Studio for shortcuts. For example, I was able to say "ctor" and hit Tab and it would create a template of a constructor for me... It would be great, when I want to create a new function, if there were shortcut commands like those that helped create all of the functions, or if there were shortcut features to do any of the complex plans."

"Eggplant Test is not a stable solution at all in my experience."

More Eggplant Test cons

"When we have updated the solution in the past there have been issues with the libraries. They need to make it clear that the libraries need to be upgraded too."

"For our purposes it requires integration with other products to get out the results in the format we want them. Adding this to the product could improve it."

"We are mainly working for manufacturing OEMs but the integration is not available. It would be a benefit if they built one integration tool for all the Teamcenter home servers and software as the main PLM data source. It is a simple process at this time, the integration could be made easier."

"I would like to be able to customize the data grids. They are currently written in Visual Basic and we are unable to get down to the cell level without hard-code."

"The solution's technical support team could be responsive."

"The solution does not support dual or regression testing."

"The object detection functionality needs to be improved."

"Part of the challenge is that Ranorex's support is over in Europe, so we can't get responses on the same day. If we had support in the United States that was a bit more timely, that would be helpful."

More Ranorex Studio cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Eggplant Test is a very expensive solution."

"End-to-end testing isn't possible for us because of the licensing problems. It's very expensive, so we only have two development/execution licenses."

"This solution is expensive when compared to the market. However, the reason it is more expensive is because of its stability, high performance, and for its support of any technology."

"It is scalable, but it is a matter of money in the pocket. You can scale it, but then you have to have additional licenses. The licensing approach of eggPlant is not the best."

"Make a smart decision about the number of developer- and execution-only licenses you purchase to maximize your budget. We found that going heavier on execution-only licenses has been a way to reduce our costs and maximize our ability to benefit from the software."

"It probably has a yearly license."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"We paid €3,000 (approximately $3,300 USD) for this solution. When you add the runtime licenses it will be €3,500 (approximately $3,900 USD)."

"The licensing fees depend on the number of users."

"This solution is a more expensive solution compared to some of the other competitors."

"There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage."

"Our company has one license per user with each costing two lakh rupees."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,008 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	23

Questions from the Community

How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?

Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Eggplant Manager?

The price of Eggplant Test is on the higher side, but the benefits it provides make it worth using.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Eggplant Manager?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Eggplant Test

Compared 18% of the time

Qt Squish vs Eggplant Test

Compared 13% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Eggplant Test

Compared 11% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Eggplant Test

Compared 11% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs Eggplant Test

Compared 7% of the time

More Eggplant Test Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 22% of the time

Qt Squish vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 15% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 13% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 7% of the time

More Ranorex Studio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test

October 2025

Download Eggplant Test product report

Buyer's Guide

Ranorex Studio

October 2025

Download Ranorex Studio product report

Also Known As

Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence, Eggplant DAI, Eggplant Automation Cloud, Eggplant Manager, Eggplant Mobile, Eggplant Customer Experience Insights

No data available

Overview

Across every industry, digital transformation is top of mind. New methods of developing software are driving fast change, and test teams are feeling the pressure. Increasing demand to release faster while maintaining the highest levels of quality is making the testing process more complex and harder to scale.

With AI-powered testing, Eggplant’s test and automation intelligence delivers the coverage you need to optimize the user experience, speed up release cycles, and improve your quality assurance process. Discover a fast, secure, and easy-to-use solution that tests any kind of software on any platform or device.

Keysight Technologies

Ranorex is a leading software development company that offers innovative test automation software. Ranorex makes testing easy, saves time in the testing process and empowers clients to ensure the highest quality of their products. Its flexible tools and quick ROI make it the ideal choice for companies of virtually any size – and this is why thousands of clients in over 60 countries trust in its excellence.

Ranorex

Sample Customers

FUJIFILM Group, NEC Personal Computers

Siemens, TomTom, Adidas, Canon, Lufthansa, Roche, Cisco, Philipps, Dell, Motorola, Toshiba, Citrix, Ericsson, sage, Continental, IBM, Credit Suisse, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test vs. Ranorex Studio

September 2025

Free Report: Eggplant Test vs. Ranorex Studio

Find out what your peers are saying about Eggplant Test vs. Ranorex Studio and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,008 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Eggplant Test vs. Ranorex Studio report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.