Edgio vs NetApp SnapMirror comparison

Edgio and NetApp are both solutions in the Data Replication category. Edgio is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.8, while NetApp is ranked #1 with an average rating of 9.1. Edgio holds a 0.3% mindshare in DR, compared to NetApp’s 17.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Edgio users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NetApp users who would recommend it.

Edgio

Read 6 Edgio reviews

34 Views
22 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NetApp SnapMirror

Read 25 NetApp SnapMirror reviews

2,096 Views
1,055 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Edgio

NetApp SnapMirror

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

NetApp SnapMirror and Edgio compete in data storage and content delivery. Edgio has the upper hand in content delivery due to its expansive global network, offering superior delivery efficiency.

Features: NetApp SnapMirror provides robust data replication for disaster recovery and business continuity, integration with cloud environments, and a straightforward deployment process. Edgio excels with its extensive global network, optimizing speed and reliability, advanced content delivery configurations, and high-capacity options for enterprises.

Room for Improvement: NetApp SnapMirror may need enhancements in global reach, network performance for content delivery, and integration with newer technologies. Edgio could improve its deployment complexity, ease of integration into existing systems, and cost structure for wider accessibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetApp SnapMirror offers straightforward deployment with comprehensive documentation, making it suitable for quick integration. Edgio provides robust customer assistance, but its advanced configurations might require more technical expertise, supporting enterprises seeking tailored solutions.

Pricing and ROI: NetApp SnapMirror offers cost-effective options with strong ROI through data protection features. Edgio's pricing reflects its specialized services, viewed as an investment for enhanced content delivery, with a balanced cost-benefit scenario for those prioritizing performance and network enhancements.

To learn more, read our detailed Edgio vs. NetApp SnapMirror Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Edgio vs. NetApp SnapMirror

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,963 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Edgio

Ranking in Data Replication

9th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

CDN (8th), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (30th), Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (17th)

NetApp SnapMirror

Ranking in Data Replication

1st

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Data Replication category, the mindshare of Edgio is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp SnapMirror is 17.7%, down from 21.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Replication

Featured Reviews

Eduardo Oviedo-Blanco

CTO and Game Developer at Solospace

A CDN solution to enhance loading times and streamline navigation

When one of the primary nodes spanning from North to South America, from the northern US to the southern US, became operational, it had a big impact. It can be challenging to explain its advantages to clients. The technical nature of the marketing material is too technical for stakeholders. Integrating the solution was straightforward, requiring no extra effort. Edgio Global CDN operates, resembling familiar cloud services but offering elevated functionality. Unlike platforms such as Google Cloud Platform or RIN geared towards development teams, Edgio emphasizes client-facing services that are integral to our operations. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Abdul-Salam

Sr. Manager - System Analyst (Datacenter Infrastructure) at Sohar International

Provides great data loss recovery and real time replication

Deployment was very smooth and took around two weeks. Following that, we carried out our data migration which took time. We previously used a Windows file independent server with its own local disk and Windows OS. It's not compatible with NetApp so data had to be physically migrated. We also took extra time integrating with our antivirus software and configuring external tape libraries with NetApp. We had one staff member involved in the deployment and an engineer from our partners. We have close to 900 users. The solution requires routine tasks as opposed to maintenance. We have three or four people with access to this storage.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The Rules Engine V4 is the most valuable feature."

"The product is easy to use and easy to implement."

"The tool's most valuable feature is the Uplynk platform for streaming purposes."

"It's super easy to use and integrate with."

"The customer support and service responsiveness were excellent."

"There are a lot of features that are excellent. The data compression during the transfer, for example, is good. The replication is great. The durability of the solution and the speed of the data moving from one site to another is impressive."

"The most valuable feature is the data replication tool. There is also a lot of ability for data migration."

"They have a very effective dashboard and good reports."

"The technical support is quite good."

"The product has good performance."

"This solution is easy to implement and easy to use."

"The most valuable feature is the snap shot."

"Overall, the product is very good. It's an easy to use tool."

More NetApp SnapMirror pros

Cons

"We could not create more than 15 custom rules."

"The tool needs to resolve its lack of innovation."

"The web interface of the Verizon Edgecast portal is very old. It's not user-friendly, slow, and it is missing some valuable features like the ability to make bulk changes."

"In the next release, I would like to see more global endpoints for their CDN and a lower price."

"We have to do manual verifications about the subscriptions often."

"The GUI can be improved to perform complex tasks"

"If they can make the application free like other vendors or include it in all the packages, it would be great."

"It is not as efficient as it needs to be. It doesn't compress the data really well when it is forwarded to a secondary site. The download performance could be better."

"The price could be cheaper."

"It's necessary to install NetApp simulator to avoid complications."

"There is probably some limitations when it comes to the scalability of the solution."

"At the moment, we are not using the synchronous mirror, but we can implement the synchronous mirror. The only thing is that it needs another license. This is the same issue we have with business continuity. It needs another license to be implemented. You need too many separate licenses for the features. They should add some of the aspects of the premium bundle into the basic bundle. Sometimes our customers choose other replication services because of the initial cost of the licenses."

More NetApp SnapMirror cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is cheaper compared to other solutions."

"Be careful about the options because to have all the features can be very expensive."

"When I modeled it out, we are spending somewhere between $600 to $800 a month with Verizon EdgeCast."

"It's a highly cost-effective solution"

"The cost is low compared to different vendors."

"The solution has monthly and yearly licensing options."

"The product price is reasonable."

"SnapMirror is extremely expensive. We had a hard time adjusting to our budget. If rated on a scale of one to ten, with ten being the most expensive, I would definitely rate it ten out of ten."

"The pricing could be improved."

"The pricing can be improved."

"It's part of the NetApp Firewall, so it's free."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Replication solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,963 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

21%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Edgio Global CDN?

The pricing was initially very expensive. However, after improving and restructuring the application, it became more affordable and now offers reasonable pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Edgio Global CDN?

Regarding improvements, I focused on testing and compatibility to ensure reliability across various mobile devices. By writing comprehensive tests and leveraging Expo's capabilities, I ensured cons...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Edgio Global CDN?

I usually use the product for mobile development. At my last company, OmniTier, I worked as a senior principal software engineer, and one of my responsibilities was leading mobile app development. ...

See all answers

What do you like most about NetApp SnapMirror?

The performance and stability are valuable features. It seems to fulfill all the requirements.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp SnapMirror?

The product price is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetApp SnapMirror?

They could make continued enhancements in integration with diverse platforms for the product.

See all answers

Comparisons

Azure Front Door vs Edgio

Compared 23% of the time

Cloudflare vs Edgio

Compared 21% of the time

Akamai vs Edgio

Compared 16% of the time

Windows Azure CDN vs Edgio

Compared 16% of the time

Fastly vs Edgio

Compared 8% of the time

More Edgio Competitors

NetApp Snapshot vs NetApp SnapMirror

Compared 86% of the time

Hitachi TrueCopy vs NetApp SnapMirror

Compared 8% of the time

Dell AppSync vs NetApp SnapMirror

Compared 5% of the time

More NetApp SnapMirror Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Replication

March 2025

Download Edgio product report

Buyer's Guide

NetApp SnapMirror

April 2025

Download NetApp SnapMirror product report

Also Known As

Limelight Content Delivery, Limelight Orchestrate Delivery, Limelight Origin Storage, Global CDN, Verizon EdgeCast

SnapMirror

Overview

Edgio helps build and deliver secure web apps across the globe in milliseconds. Our fully programmable edge network offers comprehensive services to maximize security, performance availability and site operations.

All services run at the edge of our private, global network with 250 Tbps of bandwidth capacity. We process 5% of all web traffic and are rapidly growing. Edgio is trusted and relied on by TD Ameritrade, Plus500, Solvay Bank, Yahoo, Deckers Brands, and Coach.

We offer two best-of-breed CDN services, depending on your needs:

Global CDN: Ranked as one of the fastest and largest CDNs on earth – our private global network gives you the reliability, bandwidth, and compute capacity to support the most demanding media and software downloads worldwide.

Next-Gen Web CDN: Natively unify fundamental web application services for protection, acceleration, and development. Our web CDN enables better coordination, management and visibility across your web and API properties.

Edgio

NetApp SnapMirror technology provides fast, efficient data replication and disaster recovery (DR) for your critical data. Use a single solution across all NetApp storage arrays and protocols. SnapMirror technology works with any application, in both virtual and traditional environments, and in multiple configurations, including hybrid cloud.

NetApp

Sample Customers

TD Ameritrade, Plus500, Solvay Bank, Yahoo, Deckers Brands, and Coach

University at Albany, City of Houston, Yahoo Japan, Washington Employment Security Department, DG Khan Cement Co. Ltd., AmTrust Financial Services, Sheridan College

Buyer's Guide

Edgio vs. NetApp SnapMirror

April 2025

Free Report: Edgio vs. NetApp SnapMirror

Find out what your peers are saying about Edgio vs. NetApp SnapMirror and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,963 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Edgio vs. NetApp SnapMirror report.

See our list of best Data Replication vendors.

We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.