We performed a comparison between Dynatrace and Snare based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We started monitoring our VMware hypervisors and that gave us valuable system specific metrics into our virtual environments."
"I like the full-stack agents, the Oneagents, and the futures dynamic."
"We have configured the alerting so the error or the incident will go to the respective team. Then, the team can contact the user once they see that they have an issue and ask if they can them resolve the issue."
"The most valuable feature the solution offers right now is the PurePath. When we see a web request, and something failing, we can drill down using PurePath."
"It gives us visibility into the product and what we are doing operationally."
"We can go back to when a specific user had an issue and trace the entire transaction from the client to the database."
"We had point solutions where we could see different elements of the stack, and Dynatrace ties everything together. Before, we could never get that full-stack monitoring. It also helps us get us the context of the customer experience. What's the business impact of those problems?"
"This tool has been essential for monitoring our systems, gathering all performance data, and helping to quickly resolve difficult problems affecting our customers ability to process their work through our systems."
"Snare has good agents, especially for Windows."
"The most valuable feature of Snare is flexibility or the ability to filter all things you don't want and don't have security value."
"The best thing about Snare is its format and consistency."
"Sometimes we have issues with the code on their side. We like to get it fixed."
"Mainly navigation needs improvement. It is easier to follow a flow. Following the flow of the admin now is not easy."
"I would like the ability to export a user session into csv format. (I am aware that I can export a user session via a webhook)."
"The real complexity that I've seen with Dynatrace is to learn how to navigate through all the options in the troubleshooting process. We have a lot of ways to evaluate the same problem. We had some difficulties in the beginning with the use of the product, but after some time and some experience we have overcome this problem."
"Better root cause detection and improve root cause categories. In some cases, the root cause points out only a clue of what has happened."
"We do not have any web monitoring with Dynatrace."
"Nginx monitoring service did not work out-of-the-box, so we had to tinker with it for quite some time."
"Configuring nodes and agents should be more like plug and play."
"Users will initially find it difficult to identify the event types and installation in Snare."
"The solution is now developing a SIEM-like feature on Snare Central Server, but it's not complete yet."
"Snare should modernize its GUI a little bit."
Dynatrace is ranked 4th in Log Management with 340 reviews while Snare is ranked 41st in Log Management with 3 reviews. Dynatrace is rated 8.8, while Snare is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Dynatrace writes "AI identifies all the components of a response-time issue or failure, hugely benefiting our triage efforts". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Snare writes "A highly scalable solution that is easy to manage and super easy to set up". Dynatrace is most compared with Datadog, New Relic, AppDynamics, Splunk Enterprise Security and Azure Monitor, whereas Snare is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, syslog-ng, SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server, LogRhythm SIEM and ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM). See our Dynatrace vs. Snare report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.