We performed a comparison between Dynatrace and Quantum Smart-1 Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Technical support has always been quick to respond."
"Once you are trained on the solution, it's easy to navigate. It's got very good documentation and training offerings."
"We are quite happy with the support that they have been providing."
"For me, the most valuable feature of this solution is that deep dive that we get out of the AppMon product with the PurePath technology, and the way that the PurePath stack works."
"We are using Dynatrace for prediction and staging for every step of our development cycle."
"The real-user monitoring is mostly used to gauge the difference in performance for multitenant applications, This is so we can discern if there are any local network or client-facing issues when we do a comparison between each customer. It is quite important for us to be able to identify a client-side issue, as opposed to a feature managed problem, because we're essentially providing managed services of business applications."
"Dynatrace shows the customer path, common errors on desktop and mobile, and allows us to achieve faster page loads."
"The dashboard allows us to monitor and proactively act upon any breaches in the threshold for our infrastructure."
"The most valuable features of the solution are the reporting and the traffic view that the product provides its users."
"The most valuable feature of Quantum Smart-1 Cloud lies in its scalability, providing a secure infrastructure for enterprise applications."
"Dynatrace SaaS still lacks configuration API or command line which would allow moving configuration from one tenant to the other."
"What needs improvement in Dynatrace is its dashboard. Creating dashboards in Dynatrace is good, but compared to Grafana, which is integrated with Broadcom DX APM, the resulting dashboard in Dynatrace isn't as clear. The Dynatrace dashboard needs to be more graphic."
"PurePath exports was a great feature in AppMon, but it is sometimes missing in Dynatrace."
"The one thing I am really missing is the final Azure dashboard."
"Some technical architectures are based on an event mechanism operating via a publish/subscribe system. APM technology sometimes reaches its limits to go upstream."
"It can be improved in narrowing the exact exception/ERROR in application monitoring."
"I would say it's not scalable, because we've had to move large applications that were in a shared environment to their own separate Dynatrace server instance."
"Improvements are needed in the navigation and timeframe selection when browsing problems."
"VPN configuration can get clunky sometimes."
"They could refine the interface and make the platform more intuitive and user-friendly for enterprises and developers."
Dynatrace is ranked 4th in Log Management with 340 reviews while Quantum Smart-1 Cloud is ranked 36th in Log Management with 2 reviews. Dynatrace is rated 8.8, while Quantum Smart-1 Cloud is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Dynatrace writes "AI identifies all the components of a response-time issue or failure, hugely benefiting our triage efforts". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Quantum Smart-1 Cloud writes "Has efficient security measures and seamless integration capabilities". Dynatrace is most compared with Datadog, New Relic, AppDynamics, Splunk Enterprise Security and Azure Monitor, whereas Quantum Smart-1 Cloud is most compared with . See our Dynatrace vs. Quantum Smart-1 Cloud report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
