DX Performance Management vs ManageEngine Site24x7 comparison

Broadcom and ManageEngine are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #43 with an average rating of 9.0, while ManageEngine is ranked #59 with an average rating of 8.0. Broadcom holds a 0.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to ManageEngine’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.

DX Performance Management

Read 32 DX Performance Management reviews

1,591 Views
1,241 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

ManageEngine Site24x7

Read 2 ManageEngine Site24x7 reviews

1,099 Views
736 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

DX Performance Management

ManageEngine Site24x7

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between DX Performance Management and ManageEngine Site24x7 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Auvik, Datadog and others in Network Monitoring Software.

To learn more, read our detailed Network Monitoring Software Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,444 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DX Performance Management

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

43rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Infrastructure Capacity Planning (1st), DX NetOps (2nd)

ManageEngine Site24x7

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

59th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

4.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (21st), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (48th), Cloud Monitoring Software (35th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX Performance Management is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine Site24x7 is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
DX Performance Management	0.5%
ManageEngine Site24x7	0.4%
Other	99.1%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

reviewer1810893

Senior IT Operations Specialist at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

Flexibility and detailed performance stats enable effective network monitoring

Spectrum is very good at monitoring all network faults and configurations. It enables me to take action based on network issues. The Performance Management provides detailed network performance stats, including CPU, memory, and interface bandwidth. Additionally, Spectrum is flexible and allows me to organize and treat devices uniquely without impacting other devices.

Read full review

Prashanth Magadi

Principal Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Struggled with complex licensing and limited support but have gained unified cloud monitoring

We face certain challenges with monitoring website uptime for our business operations because we don't have that 24/7 monitoring, so that's what we are working with ManageEngine on, regarding how effectively we can use that. I may not be able to give that information on how ManageEngine Site24x7 can be improved, but I felt that the monitoring or the licensing terms, such as the advanced monitors or monitors, are not very user-friendly. I feel that because I don't know how exactly we can check what devices use which license and how we can control those things; that's not user-friendly. For example, if I have to look at what all devices are utilizing my advanced monitor license or what all devices are using my basic monitor license, then if I want to pull a report or validate them, I don't have an easy option; it's too complicated.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The feature that is inherent to its core, of being able to graphically represent a trend and status, is nice."

"Considering all these factors, it's really a good and easy product for analyzing your network performance, health status, and the quality of services."

"Great dashboards and good integration with other solutions."

"You can have thousands of devices inside and hundreds of thousands of interphases without a problem."

"Since the implementation of the tool, it has cut down on probably 60% of our outages and letting us know what is going on."

"I think the product has matured a lot, and I’m impressed with CA when I hear about new features."

"The ability to very quickly and graphically navigate around, being able to zoom in to a timeframe, apply it to all the other panels... are all very intuitive."

"The network teams have transitioned to becoming proactive in responding to network performance issues, rather than being just reactive to outages."

More DX Performance Management pros

"Site24x7 stands out. It is truly amazing."

"One of the valuable features of this site is that it operates 24/7, monitoring my entire infrastructure, uptime, and related error issues."

"The deployment was not a challenge for us, because we are just trying to connect to the cloud instance; it's SaaS-based, so we just had to route all our traffic to that particular device."

Cons

"This tool gathers so much data, which makes it hard to convert over. To upgrade it, you really need the solution backed up. That is the issue that we are facing right now."

"The dashboard features are very function rich, but the reporting feature is probably not as rich as we'd like it to be."

"The solution could improve the database model. It is also not very good because they have a lot of interconnections with other data sources, such as NFA and VNA."

"CA PM Business Hours Filtering: I understand that all monitoring systems have defects. The Business Hours Filtering does not always function properly. Sometimes, when applying business hours to CA PM reports that are 30 or more days in duration, the report generation times out and does not display results. We have other CA PM reports that, when we apply Business Hours Filtering, the report results displayed are the same as without the filter. We are not sure if this is a defect in CA PM or if it is a result of our complex configuration (folder structure) and application of business hours."

"This may be available by now but for server space, when it comes to the disk file system, I'd like to see that graphically represented, or the trend, rather than what I'm seeing now."

"Since we are out of registered IP space, we are moving to ipv6 and we expect our vendors to move with us, and they have not delivered yet."

"I have mixed feeling about the scalability. I feel like there are things which are being put into UIM right now that are not being included in Performance Center that we need to see in Performance Center. We are kind of being driven to buy UIM, and I can't justify it."

"The quantity of views which are tied to specific metric families is too high. Also, the problem is the view doesn't tell you which metric family it uses, so you don't know why you don't see data."

More DX Performance Management cons

"It is technical. The engineer must be familiar with it."

"The product is not difficult to use. That said, it is technical. The engineer must be familiar with it."

"The only complaint I would state about the technical support by ManageEngine is we don't get them on call; it's only email support that we get."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's pricing is based on the number of network devices."

"We purchase a license to use the solution every three years and we have multiple contracts. They have been increasing the price annually. We have a baseline for three years and then we need to pay the difference from the baseline, and we are in the process of negotiating a new price for all the licenses we need. The price overall is affordable."

"They should provide more scalable licensing for the product."

"We were looking at other vendors in the marketplace for NetFlow, and CA just beat everybody else in price, cost, and the size to implement. "

"I like the licensing model because it's device-based."

"Do your homework and know how many devices you will be managing out of the gate. Be sure to project what your growth will be each year."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

28%

University

13%

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Large Enterprise	25

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with DX Performance Management?

Spectrum's topology view sometimes does not rebuild automatically when a device is shut down and reconnected. It requires manual discovery and rebuilding of the topology, which I hope can be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for DX Performance Management?

I have used Spectrum for monitoring all network faults, configurations, and troubleshooting network issues. It provides network performance stats, such as CPU, memory, and interface bandwidth detai...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering DX Performance Management?

I would recommend this solution based on its functionality, flexibility, customizability, and ease of use. Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. I am just a customer and not a par...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine Site24x7?

This tool can handle 40 basic monitors. I can set the pole and frequency from 130 locations, configuring the IPs to provide three advanced monitors.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine Site24x7?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ManageEngine Site24x7?

The primary use case is for the monitoring of our critical resources. We have probably not fully utilized the product, as we are still using the basic functionality of monitoring our servers and a ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Datadog vs DX Performance Management

Compared 8% of the time

Kentik vs DX Performance Management

Compared 7% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs DX Performance Management

Compared 6% of the time

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs DX Performance Management

Compared 6% of the time

Great Bay vs DX Performance Management

Compared 5% of the time

More DX Performance Management Competitors

Kentik vs ManageEngine Site24x7

Compared 19% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs ManageEngine Site24x7

Compared 11% of the time

Netdata vs ManageEngine Site24x7

Compared 10% of the time

eG Enterprise vs ManageEngine Site24x7

Compared 7% of the time

New Relic vs ManageEngine Site24x7

Compared 5% of the time

More ManageEngine Site24x7 Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DX Performance Management

March 2026

Download DX Performance Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Server Monitoring

March 2026

Download ManageEngine Site24x7 product report

Also Known As

CA Performance Management

No data available

Overview

CA Performance Management is a comprehensive and highly scalable network performance monitoring and analytics platform. It was built to meet the unique demands of big data and modern networks architectures, including highly dynamic and complex hybrid cloud and software-defined networks (SDN).

The platform is design to reduce complexity inherent in modern networks built across numerous technology stacks through advanced network performance monitoring and relationship mapping for improved operational assurance.

Combined with CA Virtual Network Assurance, the platform extends operator visibility through advanced discovery and network performance monitoring of highly sensitive cloud and multi-layered SDN networks and service chains.

Broadcom

ManageEngine Site24x7 is a comprehensive monitoring platform that aids businesses in tracking application and website performance, network activity, and server health, ensuring seamless IT operations.

Known for delivering deep insights, ManageEngine Site24x7 provides businesses with the tools necessary to maintain robust digital infrastructure. It supports monitoring of application performance, uptime, server health, and network traffic. Its cloud-based solution is suitable for IT departments seeking continuous visibility and control over their digital assets. Offering detailed analytics, it enhances decision-making by rapidly identifying potential issues before they affect business operations.

What are the key features of ManageEngine Site24x7?

Application Performance Monitoring: Tracks and optimizes application services for improved functionality.
Website Monitoring: Monitors uptime and response time to ensure web presence is uninterrupted.
Network Monitoring: Provides insights into network traffic and performance for comprehensive oversight.
Server Monitoring: Analyzes server status and resource consumption, promoting optimal performance.
Cloud Monitoring: Supports multiple cloud providers, offering a unified view of cloud services.

What benefits and ROI should users expect from ManageEngine Site24x7?

Improved Operational Efficiency: Streamlines monitoring to reduce downtime and enhance productivity.
Cost Savings: Detects issues early to minimize repair costs and resource wastage.
Enhanced Visibility: Provides thorough insights into IT infrastructure for proactive management.
Scalability: Adapts to dynamic IT environments, making it suitable for growing businesses.

ManageEngine Site24x7 is implemented across industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail. It provides solutions tailored to specific needs, ensuring critical IT systems perform reliably. Organizations benefit from its ability to monitor and report on industry-specific applications and regulatory compliance requirements.

ManageEngine

Sample Customers

Jack Henry & Assoc, Target, CenturyLink, Bell Canada, BrightHouse Networks, Telus, Unisys, Verizon, Southern California Edison, GEICO, Fidelity Investments, Wells Fargo, American Family Insurance Group, Deutsche Telekom AG

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

March 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Auvik, Datadog and others in Network Monitoring Software. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.