DX Performance Management vs LiveAction LiveNX comparison

Broadcom and BlueCat are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #55 with an average rating of 8.5, while BlueCat is ranked #29 with an average rating of 7.8. Broadcom holds a 0.3% mindshare in NMS, compared to BlueCat’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of BlueCat users who would recommend it.

DX Performance Management

Read 32 DX Performance Management reviews

778 Views
451 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

LiveAction LiveNX

Read 10 LiveAction LiveNX reviews

1,727 Views
1,226 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

DX Performance Management

LiveAction LiveNX

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

LiveNX and DX Performance Management compete in network performance management. DX Performance Management appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature sets and robust analytics, offering more detailed insights.

Features: LiveNX offers intuitive visualization, easy integration with other technologies, and real-time insights for quick troubleshooting. DX Performance Management provides advanced analytics, scalable monitoring tools, and a broader range of features for deeper data analysis.

Room for Improvement: LiveNX could expand its advanced analytics capabilities, enhance scalability for larger enterprises, and offer a broader feature range. DX Performance Management might benefit from simplifying its user interface, reducing initial setup complexity, and improving documentation for its extensive features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LiveNX has a streamlined deployment process with flexible options and efficient customer service for prompt issue resolution. DX Performance Management requires a more resource-intensive setup but offers scalable deployment options suitable for larger environments. Its customer service is comprehensive but may seem complex due to its vast feature set.

Pricing and ROI: LiveNX offers a lower initial setup cost, leading to quicker ROI with cost-effective implementation, ideal for companies seeking quick access to essential tools. DX Performance Management, with a higher initial cost, offers significant ROI through extensive capabilities and scalability, justifying the investment over time for large enterprises in need of advanced management tools.

To learn more, read our detailed DX Performance Management vs. LiveAction LiveNX Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

DX Performance Management vs. LiveAction LiveNX

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,785 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DX Performance Management

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

55th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Infrastructure Capacity Planning (2nd), DX NetOps (2nd)

LiveAction LiveNX

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

29th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (29th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX Performance Management is 0.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LiveAction LiveNX is 0.7%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
LiveAction LiveNX	0.7%
DX Performance Management	0.3%
Other	99.0%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Sandip Kheni

Lead Developer at STL - Sterlite Technologies Limited

The vertical database loads faster than any other product available

We experience disconnections between the solutions own components. In the last five years, there have been many intermittent connection issues with the four components and we still don't know the reasons. The solution has issues when loading groups that have been created in the application interfaces. It would be nice to have a mobile application. In the current industry and technical word, the mobile phone is the only thing that is always in your hands. Other Broadcom products have mobile applications but the solution doesn't offer one. It would be great to view device parameters and view or download graphs from a mobile device.

Read full review

Ashwani Bansal

Senior Solution Consultant at Orange

Network management and diagnostics improved through effective monitoring and reporting capabilities

The solution is handy. I have not used that particular feature. Maintenance is required for the system. If you want to use something on the endpoints or end-user devices, then using LiveAction LiveNX in place of other tools would be quite beneficial. The solution impacts operational costs and resources. On a scale of 1-10, I rate LiveAction LiveNX a nine.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"My sales representative, I would not trade him in for the world. He has done a really good job. I am really happy with him."

"The integration with NetFlow, the NFA solution, so that we can have our flow forensics paired with the SNMP polling performance metrics on the same page."

"The ability to very quickly and graphically navigate around, being able to zoom in to a timeframe, apply it to all the other panels... are all very intuitive."

"The integration to the other products that we use: NFA, we use ADA, we use Spectrum; and CAPM integrates all those into a single pane of glass."

"You can create intelligent alerts so you have enough time to replace the router or interface before it's full. The same is applicable for CBQoS channels."

"Customer service is top-notch."

"Spectrum is very good at monitoring all network faults and configurations."

"The tool helps us understand network performance."

More DX Performance Management pros

"One of the valuable features is the ability to create CLI scripts on the fly to fix any issues. We were using it for QoS modeling to ensure that we were properly modeling QoS, and it basically said here is what you need to fix to get this QoS done, whether it is ACL or something else. It would either push or recommend. If you have the right credentials, you could also push. It is very good if you are a Cisco shop. It gives you reporting, latency, and bandwidth utilization for your applications, so you can do good capacity management planning. There are a lot of pieces that LiveNX can give you. It is a total NPM solution for SD-WAN."

"All in all, LiveAction LiveNX has become an indispensable tool for maintaining and improving our network's reliability and performance, ultimately supporting our organization's goal of providing timely and dependable delivery services."

"The intention and the idea of the filter is great."

"On a scale of 1-10, I rate LiveAction LiveNX a nine."

"The alerting feature is very good because it allows you to set MOS alerts at various network junctures or data points."

"Its analytical capability is really good."

"The product has a very good graphical interface."

"We provide a tool for our customers to manage their reports. It's an extremely highly featured platform capable of producing a lot of data. We spent quite a long time working with customers and LiveAction to create template reports, and they're very good and configurable. You get a lot of data if you don't configure them."

More LiveAction LiveNX pros

Cons

"I have mixed feeling about the scalability. I feel like there are things which are being put into UIM right now that are not being included in Performance Center that we need to see in Performance Center. We are kind of being driven to buy UIM, and I can't justify it."

"When it goes through discovery, or whatever it is doing in the back-end that slows it down, sometimes we get some failures with it. "

"The quantity of views which are tied to specific metric families is too high. Also, the problem is the view doesn't tell you which metric family it uses, so you don't know why you don't see data."

"Product has issue collecting IP SLA data."

"This solution is not very scalable."

"For CA PM, there should be a way of easily migrating the reports coming from eHealth going to CA Performance Center, since CA PC is replacing eHealth."

"This may be available by now but for server space, when it comes to the disk file system, I'd like to see that graphically represented, or the trend, rather than what I'm seeing now."

"Policies could be improved."

More DX Performance Management cons

"The tool crashes sometimes when we try to pull reports simultaneously."

"This is a horrible solution and I think everything needs to be improved."

"Improved documentation and more responsive customer support can help in addressing issues faster."

"It is not as robust as other NPM solutions. For instance, there is a problem while labeling specific applications. It works well with well-known applications, but when you have to put in new applications that are not very known and set them up with names, ports, URLs, or some protocols, it is not as intuitive."

"Maintenance is required for the system."

"They need to create a more simplified UI."

"The customer service and technical support of LiveAction LiveNX are rated at 4 out of 10."

"Sometimes the solution does not register devices properly and that is a bug."

More LiveAction LiveNX cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"They should provide more scalable licensing for the product."

"Do your homework and know how many devices you will be managing out of the gate. Be sure to project what your growth will be each year."

"We were looking at other vendors in the marketplace for NetFlow, and CA just beat everybody else in price, cost, and the size to implement. "

"I like the licensing model because it's device-based."

"We purchase a license to use the solution every three years and we have multiple contracts. They have been increasing the price annually. We have a baseline for three years and then we need to pay the difference from the baseline, and we are in the process of negotiating a new price for all the licenses we need. The price overall is affordable."

"The tool's pricing is based on the number of network devices."

"It's very expensive."

"The solution is fairly expensive compared to other products."

"We use the free version."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,785 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Educational Organization

11%

University

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Large Enterprise	25

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about DX Performance Management?

The tool helps us understand network performance.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX Performance Management?

The tool's pricing is based on the number of network devices.

See all answers

What needs improvement with DX Performance Management?

Spectrum's topology view sometimes does not rebuild automatically when a device is shut down and reconnected. It requires manual discovery and rebuilding of the topology, which I hope can be improved.

See all answers

What do you like most about LiveAction LiveNX?

The product has a very good graphical interface.

See all answers

What needs improvement with LiveAction LiveNX?

The solution could be enhanced by implementing custom patterns for each customer.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for LiveAction LiveNX?

The customers use LiveAction LiveNX for network monitoring and management purposes.

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs DX Performance Management

Compared 24% of the time

SolarWinds AppOptics vs DX Performance Management

Compared 24% of the time

DX Spectrum vs DX Performance Management

Compared 22% of the time

SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer vs DX Performance Management

Compared 15% of the time

OmniPeek vs DX Performance Management

Compared 15% of the time

More DX Performance Management Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 17% of the time

Grafana Enterprise Stack vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 17% of the time

ThousandEyes vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 16% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 11% of the time

NetBrain vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 9% of the time

More LiveAction LiveNX Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DX Performance Management

October 2025

Download DX Performance Management product report

Buyer's Guide

LiveAction LiveNX

October 2025

Download LiveAction LiveNX product report

Also Known As

CA Performance Management

LiveNX

Overview

CA Performance Management is a comprehensive and highly scalable network performance monitoring and analytics platform. It was built to meet the unique demands of big data and modern networks architectures, including highly dynamic and complex hybrid cloud and software-defined networks (SDN).

The platform is design to reduce complexity inherent in modern networks built across numerous technology stacks through advanced network performance monitoring and relationship mapping for improved operational assurance.

Combined with CA Virtual Network Assurance, the platform extends operator visibility through advanced discovery and network performance monitoring of highly sensitive cloud and multi-layered SDN networks and service chains.

Broadcom

LiveAction develops IT visibility solutions designed to simplify network management. Initially developed to aid the US Department of Defense in the operation of its networks, LiveNX (Network Experience) features an innovative visual display, real-time big data analytics and deep control of routers and switches for unparalleled network administration. LiveNX accelerates troubleshooting with its QoS control, application-aware, and WAN functionality developed through engineering partnerships with Cisco Systems.

BlueCat

Sample Customers

Jack Henry & Assoc, Target, CenturyLink, Bell Canada, BrightHouse Networks, Telus, Unisys, Verizon, Southern California Edison, GEICO, Fidelity Investments, Wells Fargo, American Family Insurance Group, Deutsche Telekom AG

Tampa Electric, Digital First Media, Allscripts, Boxwood Technology

Buyer's Guide

DX Performance Management vs. LiveAction LiveNX

September 2025

Free Report: DX Performance Management vs. LiveAction LiveNX

Find out what your peers are saying about DX Performance Management vs. LiveAction LiveNX and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,785 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our DX Performance Management vs. LiveAction LiveNX report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.