DX NetOps vs Infraon IMS comparison

Broadcom and EverestIMS are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #36 with an average rating of 8.8, while EverestIMS is ranked #90. Broadcom holds a 0.7% mindshare in NMS, compared to EverestIMS’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of EverestIMS users who would recommend it.

DX NetOps

Read 10 DX NetOps reviews

1,522 Views
1,355 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Infraon IMS

Read 8 Infraon IMS reviews

1,027 Views
596 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

DX NetOps

Infraon IMS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Infraon IMS and DX NetOps compete in the IT performance management category. DX NetOps appears to lead in performance monitoring, while Infraon IMS is preferred for its customization options and user-friendly pricing and support structures.

Features: Infraon IMS offers real-time monitoring dashboards, role-based access, and detailed reporting capabilities, emphasizing its integrated package. DX NetOps stands out for straightforward configuration, efficient data gathering, and strong performance management.

Room for Improvement: Infraon IMS should broaden its feature set, improve reporting and AI functionality, and enhance its GUI. The inclusion of NFA network analysis could also be beneficial. DX NetOps would benefit from more automation, a refined UI, and lower hardware requirements. Streamlining its modules for a cohesive solution could also help.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both products primarily support on-premises deployment, with some hybrid options. DX NetOps is noted for its simple setup and minimal need for technical support. Infraon IMS is praised for its responsive customer support but can improve in response times.

Pricing and ROI: Infraon IMS provides flexible, budget-friendly pricing with feature-based customization, leading to cost savings and improved efficiency. It is known for its transparent device-based licensing. DX NetOps, despite higher initial costs, often provides competitive discounts. Though offering significant time savings, its cost effectiveness depends on project scale and location.

To learn more, read our detailed DX NetOps vs. Infraon IMS Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps vs. Infraon IMS

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DX NetOps

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

36th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AIOps (19th)

Infraon IMS

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

90th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (35th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (56th), Cloud Monitoring Software (52nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX NetOps is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Infraon IMS is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
DX NetOps	0.7%
Infraon IMS	0.4%
Other	98.9%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Balabrahmam_Chakka

Senior Program Manager at Tata Consultancy Services

Has provided topological insights and dashboard-driven network visibility across complex environments

DX NetOps can be improved by expanding its integrations with different tools, as it can currently integrate with Spectrum and other Broadcom products. It would be beneficial to gain integration capabilities with tools such as New Relic or SolarWinds. Integration with DX NetOps occurs through API, which fetches metrics from those tools, and this is currently happening in our area, with DX NetOps receiving data not only from Spectrum but also from New Relic and SolarWinds. DX NetOps could be improved by providing more communication methods beyond SNMP traps to accommodate different private clouds, especially as customers increasingly adopt vendor-specific clouds. For example, Sainsbury's uses SAP cloud, SAS, and Oracle cloud, where monitoring is not currently possible through DX NetOps and Spectrum, which are limited to certain mechanisms. Within the organization, SNMP is usable, but to display metrics from outside the organization, different communication methods such as agent-based connections, TCP/IP, or secured connections are necessary—features not currently available in DX NetOps and Spectrum.

Read full review

Maharajan S

VSO at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Provides data accuracy for availability and policy harmonization

The reporting capabilities are a challenge and could be improved. We have been trying to connect to it from our help desk ticketing system, because the ticketing system manages asset tracking, which has been a bit challenging for us. Otherwise, they give some reports that are okay, but we do not use them much because we work in the dashboard. This solution is available in SaaS. The reason why we have not gone to SaaS is they do not have a country-specific separation of assets. There are GDPR and other requirements that might require country-specific sensitive information to be filtered as well as other things that need to be taken care of. Normally, if we need to do any compliance, like ISO27000 compliance, they don't have such a report within their system. This kind of report is missing from their SaaS. That is one of the reasons that we have gone to the on-prem version, where I am assured that my data is secure. I can take the report and show it to them from a compliance point of view. However, the moment we go to a SaaS model, I don't have control of the data and where the data is stored. I don't receive any complaints-based reports from the SaaS model.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The AI is the best feature in this solution."

"DX NetOps network monitoring and fault tolerance are the absolute best in the market, especially for the Indian market."

"I rate the stability of the product as ten on a scale of one to ten, indicating that it is very stable."

"The product features include automation through AI, allowing out-of-the-box analysis of performance data, building baseline trends, and enabling configuration of dynamic thresholds relative to collected data."

"I like that it provides an overall view of our network. From the topology view to every event, we can view it. We can also see the interface utilization for future capacity planning. It fits our use case and environment."

"It's good for root cause analysis for network problems and network link problems."

"It is straightforward to configure, and you can quickly gather data from your infrastructure."

"The best features I've seen so far with DX NetOps are that it can work with large scale systems, and it has a lot of functionalities and matrices."

More DX NetOps pros

"The feature that I like the most and the best part is the customization."

"It is a stable product. After the initial configuration, you don't have to tweak it much. All systems of Everest IMS work perfectly."

"The backup, restore, and comparison features are all good."

"Our response time is within 30 minutes for any support. This solution provides alerts immediately, so we are within our SLA, giving efficiency to our support."

"We use the solution to automatically trigger processes to help us resolve issues. The whole IT process has been automated, such as trying to map all the users and the escalation process. So, if any issue happens, we get an SMS and WhatsApp of the report. If there is a critical issue this has to be sorted out, like the entire data center being down, then there is an alarm."

"The role-based dashboards provide data points and charts and topology diagrams in a single window. It's like a spider web, where the application, connectivity, and everything is defined for each user of those applications."

"Their discovery is very quick and they have a CSV file upload mechanism that allows you to onboard five thousand devices a day."

"The most valuable feature is alerting. We get email alerts when a link is down that tell us which device is having a problem."

Cons

"I would like DX NetOps to integrate with all Broadcom products in the future to make it closer to a rating of 10."

"The licensing cost of DX NetOps is expensive, not very affordable, and on the top of the price range in the market."

"The hardware requirements can be improved."

"Technical support could be more responsive."

"Technical support needs to be better. They need to be more knowledgeable and responsive."

"One improvement that could make the product better is to streamline its modules into a more cohesive solution."

"It would be useful to have more AI features."

"DX NetOps could be improved by providing more communication methods beyond SNMP traps to accommodate different private clouds, especially as customers increasingly adopt vendor-specific clouds."

More DX NetOps cons

"The graphical view of the topology does not show us all of the connectivity in our network, which is something that could be improved."

"The GUI is in need of improvement. It is not drag-and-drop or easy to use."

"I would like to see an integrated view of Infraon IMS and Infraon Desk. It would be very helpful if that were integrated into the solution."

"This solution is available in SaaS. The reason why we have not gone to SaaS is they do not have a country-specific separation of assets. There are GDPR and other requirements that might require country-specific sensitive information to be filtered as well as other things that need to be taken care of. Normally, if we need to do any compliance, like ISO27000 compliance, they don't have such a report within their system. This kind of report is missing from their SaaS. That is one of the reasons that we have gone to the on-prem version, where I am assured that my data is secure."

"I would like to have the option to add a new device or meet with the next release. Right now, it needs to be done from the backend which results in a heavy reliance on R&D."

"There might be some features in other products that are currently not there in Everest IMS and can be included. I have not yet compared it with any other product."

"We have enquired if there are any possibilities of monitoring non-IPBS devices."

"Email support is a bit slow. Once you drop an email, it takes time."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The cost model is within our budget. I have less than 180 critical assets, but the moment that I have 1,000 assets, then the license model is totally different. I don't know whether they are capable of handling that kind of a load. They could revisit the licensing model."

"We pay for a number of devices on the accounts and since it is on-premises, we pay the maintenance charges for the year."

"I think that the pricing for this solution is reasonable and varies by number of devices."

"If you are looking for the best product with the best price, Infraon is the best product. We evaluated five to six products and finally felt Infraon was better because of the pricing model, especially because it was more flexible."

"Licensing is calculated on a per-user basis."

"The pricing is reasonable, given the features that they provide."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

12%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

18%

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX NetOps?

The pricing is fair for the level of enterprise capability it provides. Proper sizing and planning during deployment helps optimise licensing and overall cost. Anyone adopting it should account for...

See all answers

What needs improvement with DX NetOps?

I would like DX NetOps to integrate with all Broadcom products in the future to make it closer to a rating of 10. I would particularly like it to integrate with the Symantec portfolio and the Carbo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for DX NetOps?

I use DX NetOps for large-scale network monitoring, fault detection, and performance analysis. My work involves evaluating how well it handles distributed environments, event correlation, and proac...

See all answers

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

It actually depends on the exact purpose or requirements. Some tools are better for only network devices while others are better from a cloud monitoring or APM monitoring perspective. You can check...

See all answers

Comparisons

LogicMonitor vs DX NetOps

Compared 13% of the time

ManageEngine OpManager vs DX NetOps

Compared 12% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs DX NetOps

Compared 9% of the time

DX Spectrum vs DX NetOps

Compared 8% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs DX NetOps

Compared 7% of the time

More DX NetOps Competitors

Zabbix vs Infraon IMS

Compared 14% of the time

Instana Infrastructure Monitoring vs Infraon IMS

Compared 13% of the time

Equinix IBX SmartView vs Infraon IMS

Compared 12% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Infraon IMS

Compared 9% of the time

SolarWinds AppOptics vs Infraon IMS

Compared 8% of the time

More Infraon IMS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps

January 2026

Download DX NetOps product report

Buyer's Guide

Infraon IMS

January 2026

Download Infraon IMS product report

Also Known As

No data available

Everest IMS

Overview

DX NetOps by CA Technologies, a Broadcom company, improves your time to value through advanced AI capabilities and unified network visibility that delivers simplified NetOps intelligence into the user experience that traverses modern architectures. DX NetOps accomplishes this through high scale, unified network monitoring that enables full-stack analytics for assuring traditional and modern architectures. DX NetOps converts inventory, topology, device metrics, faults, flow and packet analysis into actionable intelligence for network operations teams. Complimented by our AIOps solution, DX NetOps enables IT teams to establish proactive, autonomous remediation capabilities across the applications, infrastructure, and networks that fuel superior user experiences.

Broadcom

Infraon IMS offers network monitoring with real-time dashboards, customizable GUIs, and integrated tools, supporting device management and workflow automation efficiently.

Infraon IMS delivers stable performance with features tailored for easy customization and detailed network management. Users benefit from real-time monitoring through role-based dashboards and integrated ticketing tools. However, improvements in reporting, GUI usability, and AI integration are needed. Challenges include monitoring non-IPBS devices and improving connectivity visibility. Users require seamless Infraon Desk integration, ease of device addition, and enhanced topology views.

What are the key features of Infraon IMS?

Stable Performance: Provides consistent network oversight.
Customizable Dashboards: Role-based, interactive GUIs for tailored views.
Real-Time Monitoring: Comprehensive network visibility and alerts.
Workflow Automation: Streamlines operational processes.
Configuration Backup: Ensures data integrity and easy recovery.
Granular Reporting: Delivers detailed insights and analysis.
Intuitive Interface: Enhances user interaction and experience.
Quick Device Discovery: Facilitates effective network management.
Email Alerts: Keeps users informed on device status.
CSV Upload: Manages high-volume device data efficiently.

What benefits do users find in Infraon IMS?

Centralized Access: Simplifies firewall and device management.
Enhanced IT Management: Improved monitoring of uptime, downtime, and utilization.
Flexible Deployment: Support for global locations with cloud and on-premises options.
Link Monitoring Automation: Boosts operational efficiency.

In industries like IT infrastructure and data center management, Infraon IMS is utilized for network monitoring and managing key components such as leased lines and firewalls. Its capabilities aid diverse geographical locations in overseeing data centers, offering centralized monitoring and access to critical infrastructure.

EverestIMS

Sample Customers

Fujitsu

Airtel, BSNL, BlackBox Corporation, ACT, Geojit, Canara Bank, Federal Bank, Corporation Bank, Birla Corporation, CESC Limited, Mphasis, GAIL, Udaan, Cowrks, SEBI, PowerGrid, ION, Summit Communications, National Information Technology Center (Nepal), Bhutan National Bank, Servion T, Greenlam, Translab Technologies, CMSIT Services, Nelco, HPCL, Navitas Life Sciences etc.

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps vs. Infraon IMS

December 2025

Free Report: DX NetOps vs. Infraon IMS

Find out what your peers are saying about DX NetOps vs. Infraon IMS and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our DX NetOps vs. Infraon IMS report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.