DX NetOps vs Infraon IMS comparison

Broadcom and EverestIMS are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #38 with an average rating of 9.0, while EverestIMS is ranked #83. Broadcom holds a 0.7% mindshare in NMS, compared to EverestIMS’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of EverestIMS users who would recommend it.

DX NetOps

Read 10 DX NetOps reviews

3,073 Views
2,674 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Infraon IMS

Read 8 Infraon IMS reviews

2,997 Views
1,768 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

DX NetOps

Infraon IMS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Infraon IMS and DX NetOps compete in the IT performance management category. DX NetOps appears to lead in performance monitoring, while Infraon IMS is preferred for its customization options and user-friendly pricing and support structures.

Features: Infraon IMS offers real-time monitoring dashboards, role-based access, and detailed reporting capabilities, emphasizing its integrated package. DX NetOps stands out for straightforward configuration, efficient data gathering, and strong performance management.

Room for Improvement: Infraon IMS should broaden its feature set, improve reporting and AI functionality, and enhance its GUI. The inclusion of NFA network analysis could also be beneficial. DX NetOps would benefit from more automation, a refined UI, and lower hardware requirements. Streamlining its modules for a cohesive solution could also help.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both products primarily support on-premises deployment, with some hybrid options. DX NetOps is noted for its simple setup and minimal need for technical support. Infraon IMS is praised for its responsive customer support but can improve in response times.

Pricing and ROI: Infraon IMS provides flexible, budget-friendly pricing with feature-based customization, leading to cost savings and improved efficiency. It is known for its transparent device-based licensing. DX NetOps, despite higher initial costs, often provides competitive discounts. Though offering significant time savings, its cost effectiveness depends on project scale and location.

To learn more, read our detailed DX NetOps vs. Infraon IMS Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps vs. Infraon IMS

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DX NetOps

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

38th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AIOps (18th)

Infraon IMS

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

83rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (32nd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (56th), Cloud Monitoring Software (48th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX NetOps is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Infraon IMS is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
DX NetOps	0.7%
Infraon IMS	0.5%
Other	98.8%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Balabrahmam_Chakka

Senior Program Manager at Tata Consultancy Services

Has provided topological insights and dashboard-driven network visibility across complex environments

DX NetOps can be improved by expanding its integrations with different tools, as it can currently integrate with Spectrum and other Broadcom products. It would be beneficial to gain integration capabilities with tools such as New Relic or SolarWinds. Integration with DX NetOps occurs through API, which fetches metrics from those tools, and this is currently happening in our area, with DX NetOps receiving data not only from Spectrum but also from New Relic and SolarWinds. DX NetOps could be improved by providing more communication methods beyond SNMP traps to accommodate different private clouds, especially as customers increasingly adopt vendor-specific clouds. For example, Sainsbury's uses SAP cloud, SAS, and Oracle cloud, where monitoring is not currently possible through DX NetOps and Spectrum, which are limited to certain mechanisms. Within the organization, SNMP is usable, but to display metrics from outside the organization, different communication methods such as agent-based connections, TCP/IP, or secured connections are necessary—features not currently available in DX NetOps and Spectrum.

Read full review

it_user1631601

GTM Manager at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Our process efficiency has improved by having all the information in one place, which has reduced manpower

The product is great. We integrated the ticketing tool with the monitoring tool. The agent ID creation is very easy when using this tool. It is so user-friendly. The user interface is good and also the pricing is great. The user interface is good, even a business user or layman can raise a ticket. They provide an all-in-one monitoring tool. If an issue happens, it gets integrated with the email, then proactively that ticket is being raised, which is good. The reporting is good. It is very clear. It is a customized report; however you want it, you can customize it. We use the solution’s role-based dashboards. The head of IT wants to use it so he can see holistically what is happening, e.g., what are the tickets being raised, what is a major issue, and what escalations are happening. There are different dashboards that are customized. For our head of IT, we made a separate dashboard. Then, for the executives, we made a separate dashboard based on time, like hourly or daily. All these reports were customized. While they didn't provide a BI dashboard, they provide a kind of graphical dashboard for whatever the issue is. Once you click on a particular ticket, it drills down to the issue, what it is and when the issue was raised. The drill down is good. It is more like a business intelligence (BI) tool. You can just scroll and zoom in. It goes deep into the issue. Once you click a particular dashboard, it will take you to the next page, then it takes you to the issue. Infraon IMS provides workflow automation for real-world use cases. This makes our work easier. It is just drag and drop (no coding) to build the workflows. For example, a particular ticket is being raised. It gets routed to three important IT executives within our team. From our team, it gets routed to the next level. The learning curve is good. Initially, there were no issues. As soon as the users saw the product, they understood what the product was. There wasn't any kind of training required for this product because it is very straightforward.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I rate the stability of the product as ten on a scale of one to ten, indicating that it is very stable."

"DX NetOps network monitoring and fault tolerance are the absolute best in the market, especially for the Indian market."

"It is straightforward to configure, and you can quickly gather data from your infrastructure."

"It's good for root cause analysis for network problems and network link problems."

"I like that it provides an overall view of our network. From the topology view to every event, we can view it. We can also see the interface utilization for future capacity planning. It fits our use case and environment."

"The solution is stable."

"Real-time insights through DX NetOps benefit diagnosing and resolving network issues since Spectrum has all sorts of details, but it lacks dashboards and a readable tabular format."

"A highly scalable solution."

More DX NetOps pros

"The most valuable feature is alerting. We get email alerts when a link is down that tell us which device is having a problem."

"With Infraon, everything is already built-in so you are able to plug-and-play with the system."

"If you are looking for the best product with the best price, Infraon is the best product."

"Overall, it's a wonderful one-stop ITSM solution for infrastructure."

"Our response time is within 30 minutes for any support. This solution provides alerts immediately, so we are within our SLA, giving efficiency to our support."

"Their discovery is very quick and they have a CSV file upload mechanism that allows you to onboard five thousand devices a day."

"It is a stable product; after the initial configuration, you don't have to tweak it much, and all systems of Everest IMS work perfectly."

"Being an engineering product, the customization is easy for us compared to SolarWinds and ManageEngine."

More Infraon IMS pros

Cons

"I would like DX NetOps to integrate with all Broadcom products in the future to make it closer to a rating of 10."

"DX NetOps is somewhat convoluted, and some of the programming constructs can be documented or driven through languages such as Python, Perl, and shell scripting, but they have their proprietary language, which may not be very user-friendly."

"Technical support needs to be better. They need to be more knowledgeable and responsive."

"It would be useful to have more AI features."

"The hardware requirements can be improved."

"Lacks dashboards and better integration with other solutions."

"Technical support could be more responsive."

"It would be better if they had an NFA network analysis feature. We appreciate features like extended network security for bucket flows, but it would be better to have some IDs, IPS functionalities, DDoS, or something like that."

More DX NetOps cons

"The GUI is in need of improvement. It is not drag-and-drop or easy to use."

"This solution is available in SaaS. The reason why we have not gone to SaaS is they do not have a country-specific separation of assets."

"This solution is available in SaaS. The reason why we have not gone to SaaS is they do not have a country-specific separation of assets. There are GDPR and other requirements that might require country-specific sensitive information to be filtered as well as other things that need to be taken care of. Normally, if we need to do any compliance, like ISO27000 compliance, they don't have such a report within their system. This kind of report is missing from their SaaS. That is one of the reasons that we have gone to the on-prem version, where I am assured that my data is secure."

"Email support is a bit slow. Once you drop an email, it takes time."

"I would like to have the option to add a new device or meet with the next release. Right now, it needs to be done from the backend which results in a heavy reliance on R&D."

"Technical support could use some improvement in terms of their response times and diagnostic accuracy."

"There might be some features in other products that are currently not there in Everest IMS and can be included. I have not yet compared it with any other product."

"The graphical view of the topology does not show us all of the connectivity in our network, which is something that could be improved."

More Infraon IMS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The pricing is reasonable, given the features that they provide."

"We pay for a number of devices on the accounts and since it is on-premises, we pay the maintenance charges for the year."

"I think that the pricing for this solution is reasonable and varies by number of devices."

"If you are looking for the best product with the best price, Infraon is the best product. We evaluated five to six products and finally felt Infraon was better because of the pricing model, especially because it was more flexible."

"The cost model is within our budget. I have less than 180 critical assets, but the moment that I have 1,000 assets, then the license model is totally different. I don't know whether they are capable of handling that kind of a load. They could revisit the licensing model."

"Licensing is calculated on a per-user basis."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX NetOps?

The pricing is fair for the level of enterprise capability it provides. Proper sizing and planning during deployment helps optimise licensing and overall cost. Anyone adopting it should account for...

See all answers

What needs improvement with DX NetOps?

I would like DX NetOps to integrate with all Broadcom products in the future to make it closer to a rating of 10. I would particularly like it to integrate with the Symantec portfolio and the Carbo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for DX NetOps?

I use DX NetOps for large-scale network monitoring, fault detection, and performance analysis. My work involves evaluating how well it handles distributed environments, event correlation, and proac...

See all answers

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

It actually depends on the exact purpose or requirements. Some tools are better for only network devices while others are better from a cloud monitoring or APM monitoring perspective. You can check...

See all answers

Comparisons

LogicMonitor vs DX NetOps

Compared 10% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs DX NetOps

Compared 8% of the time

ManageEngine OpManager vs DX NetOps

Compared 8% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs DX NetOps

Compared 7% of the time

DX Spectrum vs DX NetOps

Compared 7% of the time

More DX NetOps Competitors

Nagios XI vs Infraon IMS

Compared 8% of the time

Zabbix vs Infraon IMS

Compared 8% of the time

Equinix IBX SmartView vs Infraon IMS

Compared 5% of the time

Instana Infrastructure Monitoring vs Infraon IMS

Compared 4% of the time

SolarWinds AppOptics vs Infraon IMS

Compared 3% of the time

More Infraon IMS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps

June 2026

Download DX NetOps product report

Buyer's Guide

Infraon IMS

June 2026

Download Infraon IMS product report

Also Known As

No data available

Everest IMS

Overview

DX NetOps offers robust network monitoring capabilities along with AI-driven automation and predictive analytics, making it a valuable tool for ensuring network performance and reliability across hybrid environments.

DX NetOps is designed to provide comprehensive visibility into network infrastructure, focusing on root cause analysis, ease of setup, scalability, and stability. Its features allow for proactive issue identification through custom dashboards, while integration with IT systems ensures seamless connectivity. Performance management and insightful analytics enhance network visibility, aiding resource allocation in hybrid environments. Organizations utilize DX NetOps for monitoring, alerting, and analytics across network devices, benefiting from integration with platforms like ServiceNow.

What are the key features of DX NetOps?

Root Cause Analysis: Identifies network issues efficiently to minimize downtime.
Scalability: Supports expansive networks without compromising performance.
AI-Driven Automation: Streamlines network management tasks using artificial intelligence.
Predictive Analytics: Anticipates potential network problems, enabling proactive measures.
Topological Views: Provides visual insights into network structure and connectivity.
Custom Dashboards: Allows users to tailor views for specific monitoring and analysis needs.

What benefits or ROI should users anticipate?

Enhanced Network Visibility: Improved insights lead to better network performance management.
Proactive Issue Identification: Early detection of issues reduces downtime and service interruptions.
Improved Resource Allocation: Optimizes network resources across hybrid environments.
Seamless IT Integration: Ensures efficient workflows with other systems for better performance tracking.
Infrastructure Planning Support: Assists in preparing for peak periods with detailed analytics.

DX NetOps is widely implemented across telecommunications, financial services, and manufacturing industries. Organizations leverage its capabilities for monitoring extensive network infrastructures, ensuring optimal performance through integration with existing platforms and enhancing decision-making processes with detailed network analytics.

Broadcom

Infraon IMS offers network monitoring with real-time dashboards, customizable GUIs, and integrated tools, supporting device management and workflow automation efficiently.

Infraon IMS delivers stable performance with features tailored for easy customization and detailed network management. Users benefit from real-time monitoring through role-based dashboards and integrated ticketing tools. However, improvements in reporting, GUI usability, and AI integration are needed. Challenges include monitoring non-IPBS devices and improving connectivity visibility. Users require seamless Infraon Desk integration, ease of device addition, and enhanced topology views.

What are the key features of Infraon IMS?

Stable Performance: Provides consistent network oversight.
Customizable Dashboards: Role-based, interactive GUIs for tailored views.
Real-Time Monitoring: Comprehensive network visibility and alerts.
Workflow Automation: Streamlines operational processes.
Configuration Backup: Ensures data integrity and easy recovery.
Granular Reporting: Delivers detailed insights and analysis.
Intuitive Interface: Enhances user interaction and experience.
Quick Device Discovery: Facilitates effective network management.
Email Alerts: Keeps users informed on device status.
CSV Upload: Manages high-volume device data efficiently.

What benefits do users find in Infraon IMS?

Centralized Access: Simplifies firewall and device management.
Enhanced IT Management: Improved monitoring of uptime, downtime, and utilization.
Flexible Deployment: Support for global locations with cloud and on-premises options.
Link Monitoring Automation: Boosts operational efficiency.

In industries like IT infrastructure and data center management, Infraon IMS is utilized for network monitoring and managing key components such as leased lines and firewalls. Its capabilities aid diverse geographical locations in overseeing data centers, offering centralized monitoring and access to critical infrastructure.

EverestIMS

Sample Customers

Fujitsu

Airtel, BSNL, BlackBox Corporation, ACT, Geojit, Canara Bank, Federal Bank, Corporation Bank, Birla Corporation, CESC Limited, Mphasis, GAIL, Udaan, Cowrks, SEBI, PowerGrid, ION, Summit Communications, National Information Technology Center (Nepal), Bhutan National Bank, Servion T, Greenlam, Translab Technologies, CMSIT Services, Nelco, HPCL, Navitas Life Sciences etc.

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps vs. Infraon IMS

June 2026

Free Report: DX NetOps vs. Infraon IMS

Find out what your peers are saying about DX NetOps vs. Infraon IMS and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our DX NetOps vs. Infraon IMS report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.