DX NetOps vs Infraon IMS comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Broadcom and EverestIMS are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #33 with an average rating of 9.0, while EverestIMS is ranked #84. Broadcom holds a 0.7% mindshare in NMS, compared to EverestIMS’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of EverestIMS users who would recommend it.

DX NetOps

Read 10 DX NetOps reviews

3,875 Views
3,333 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Infraon IMS

Read 8 Infraon IMS reviews

4,007 Views
2,324 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

DX NetOps

Infraon IMS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Infraon IMS and DX NetOps compete in the IT performance management category. DX NetOps appears to lead in performance monitoring, while Infraon IMS is preferred for its customization options and user-friendly pricing and support structures.

Features: Infraon IMS offers real-time monitoring dashboards, role-based access, and detailed reporting capabilities, emphasizing its integrated package. DX NetOps stands out for straightforward configuration, efficient data gathering, and strong performance management.

Room for Improvement: Infraon IMS should broaden its feature set, improve reporting and AI functionality, and enhance its GUI. The inclusion of NFA network analysis could also be beneficial. DX NetOps would benefit from more automation, a refined UI, and lower hardware requirements. Streamlining its modules for a cohesive solution could also help.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both products primarily support on-premises deployment, with some hybrid options. DX NetOps is noted for its simple setup and minimal need for technical support. Infraon IMS is praised for its responsive customer support but can improve in response times.

Pricing and ROI: Infraon IMS provides flexible, budget-friendly pricing with feature-based customization, leading to cost savings and improved efficiency. It is known for its transparent device-based licensing. DX NetOps, despite higher initial costs, often provides competitive discounts. Though offering significant time savings, its cost effectiveness depends on project scale and location.

To learn more, read our detailed DX NetOps vs. Infraon IMS Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps vs. Infraon IMS

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DX NetOps

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

33rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AIOps (19th)

Infraon IMS

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

84th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (32nd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (57th), Cloud Monitoring Software (50th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX NetOps is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Infraon IMS is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
DX NetOps	0.7%
Infraon IMS	0.6%
Other	98.7%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Balabrahmam_Chakka

Senior Program Manager at Tata Consultancy Services

Has provided topological insights and dashboard-driven network visibility across complex environments

DX NetOps can be improved by expanding its integrations with different tools, as it can currently integrate with Spectrum and other Broadcom products. It would be beneficial to gain integration capabilities with tools such as New Relic or SolarWinds. Integration with DX NetOps occurs through API, which fetches metrics from those tools, and this is currently happening in our area, with DX NetOps receiving data not only from Spectrum but also from New Relic and SolarWinds. DX NetOps could be improved by providing more communication methods beyond SNMP traps to accommodate different private clouds, especially as customers increasingly adopt vendor-specific clouds. For example, Sainsbury's uses SAP cloud, SAS, and Oracle cloud, where monitoring is not currently possible through DX NetOps and Spectrum, which are limited to certain mechanisms. Within the organization, SNMP is usable, but to display metrics from outside the organization, different communication methods such as agent-based connections, TCP/IP, or secured connections are necessary—features not currently available in DX NetOps and Spectrum.

Read full review

it_user1734441

Networking Head at Birla Corporation Ltd

Good statistical reporting, provides alerts via email, helpful support

The reporting capabilities are good. We have to manually configure reports based on what data we require. For example, it can show the downtime for uptime for a device. Once we configure the profile for each report, we can download it. We use Infraon to automatically trigger processes to help resolve issues when they are detected. For example, it will automatically raise a ticket and send an email to our ISP when it detects that a link is down. When a process is triggered automatically, we run one of the pre-configured scripts. We have not created any of the scripts ourselves but rather, only use the ones that are provided. These scripts are important because we use them for generating reports and emailing alerts, which are also used for auditing purposes. For example, our IT department has been improved because Infraon automatically creates reports that show our site uptime and downtime. We can see which site has more bandwidth utilization, link utilization, and link problems. It will show us what other devices are in the environment, which ones we need to replace, and how many sessions are being created. This solution assists us with our billing because we have many critical locations, and these need to have one hundred percent uptime, every month of the year. We generate reports monthly, quarterly, and yearly, which we then submit to management to cite the total uptime. Based on this, the billing is done. With respect to the learning curve, this tool is easy to learn because there is a lot of training material included. I suggest that the entire team learn to use it, rather than just one person, because it will make the tool more effective for the organization.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is straightforward to configure, and you can quickly gather data from your infrastructure."

"The AI is the best feature in this solution."

"It's good for root cause analysis for network problems and network link problems."

"A highly scalable solution."

"I rate the stability of the product as ten on a scale of one to ten, indicating that it is very stable."

"The product features include automation through AI, allowing out-of-the-box analysis of performance data, building baseline trends, and enabling configuration of dynamic thresholds relative to collected data."

"The best features I've seen so far with DX NetOps are that it can work with large scale systems, and it has a lot of functionalities and matrices."

"The solution is stable."

More DX NetOps pros

"With Infraon, everything is already built-in so you are able to plug-and-play with the system."

"The feature that I like the most and the best part is the customization."

"Once we installed this central system, our site engineers who provide the data started believing in the data's accuracy."

"Their discovery is very quick and they have a CSV file upload mechanism that allows you to onboard five thousand devices a day."

"It is a stable product; after the initial configuration, you don't have to tweak it much, and all systems of Everest IMS work perfectly."

"Our response time is within 30 minutes for any support. This solution provides alerts immediately, so we are within our SLA, giving efficiency to our support."

"The backup, restore, and comparison features are all good."

"The role-based dashboards provide data points and charts and topology diagrams in a single window. It's like a spider web, where the application, connectivity, and everything is defined for each user of those applications."

More Infraon IMS pros

Cons

"Technical support needs to be better. They need to be more knowledgeable and responsive."

"Technical support could be more responsive."

"It would be useful to have more AI features."

"DX NetOps is somewhat convoluted, and some of the programming constructs can be documented or driven through languages such as Python, Perl, and shell scripting, but they have their proprietary language, which may not be very user-friendly."

"I would like DX NetOps to integrate with all Broadcom products in the future to make it closer to a rating of 10."

"The hardware requirements can be improved."

"DX NetOps could be improved by providing more communication methods beyond SNMP traps to accommodate different private clouds, especially as customers increasingly adopt vendor-specific clouds."

"Lacks dashboards and better integration with other solutions."

More DX NetOps cons

"I would like to have the option to add a new device or meet with the next release. Right now, it needs to be done from the backend which results in a heavy reliance on R&D."

"The graphical view of the topology does not show us all of the connectivity in our network, which is something that could be improved."

"This solution is available in SaaS. The reason why we have not gone to SaaS is they do not have a country-specific separation of assets. There are GDPR and other requirements that might require country-specific sensitive information to be filtered as well as other things that need to be taken care of. Normally, if we need to do any compliance, like ISO27000 compliance, they don't have such a report within their system. This kind of report is missing from their SaaS. That is one of the reasons that we have gone to the on-prem version, where I am assured that my data is secure."

"I would like to see an integrated view of Infraon IMS and Infraon Desk. It would be very helpful if that were integrated into the solution."

"Email support is a bit slow. Once you drop an email, it takes time."

"The GUI is in need of improvement. It is not drag-and-drop or easy to use."

"We have enquired if there are any possibilities of monitoring non-IPBS devices."

"This solution is available in SaaS. The reason why we have not gone to SaaS is they do not have a country-specific separation of assets."

More Infraon IMS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Licensing is calculated on a per-user basis."

"The pricing is reasonable, given the features that they provide."

"We pay for a number of devices on the accounts and since it is on-premises, we pay the maintenance charges for the year."

"If you are looking for the best product with the best price, Infraon is the best product. We evaluated five to six products and finally felt Infraon was better because of the pricing model, especially because it was more flexible."

"I think that the pricing for this solution is reasonable and varies by number of devices."

"The cost model is within our budget. I have less than 180 critical assets, but the moment that I have 1,000 assets, then the license model is totally different. I don't know whether they are capable of handling that kind of a load. They could revisit the licensing model."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

11%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

17%

Outsourcing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX NetOps?

The pricing is fair for the level of enterprise capability it provides. Proper sizing and planning during deployment helps optimise licensing and overall cost. Anyone adopting it should account for...

See all answers

What needs improvement with DX NetOps?

I would like DX NetOps to integrate with all Broadcom products in the future to make it closer to a rating of 10. I would particularly like it to integrate with the Symantec portfolio and the Carbo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for DX NetOps?

I use DX NetOps for large-scale network monitoring, fault detection, and performance analysis. My work involves evaluating how well it handles distributed environments, event correlation, and proac...

See all answers

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

It actually depends on the exact purpose or requirements. Some tools are better for only network devices while others are better from a cloud monitoring or APM monitoring perspective. You can check...

See all answers

Comparisons

LogicMonitor vs DX NetOps

Compared 8% of the time

ManageEngine OpManager vs DX NetOps

Compared 7% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs DX NetOps

Compared 7% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs DX NetOps

Compared 6% of the time

DX Spectrum vs DX NetOps

Compared 6% of the time

More DX NetOps Competitors

Nagios XI vs Infraon IMS

Compared 7% of the time

Zabbix vs Infraon IMS

Compared 7% of the time

Equinix IBX SmartView vs Infraon IMS

Compared 4% of the time

Instana Infrastructure Monitoring vs Infraon IMS

Compared 3% of the time

Splunk Observability Cloud vs Infraon IMS

Compared 3% of the time

More Infraon IMS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps

October 2026

Download DX NetOps product report

Buyer's Guide

Infraon IMS

September 2026

Download Infraon IMS product report

Also Known As

No data available

Everest IMS

Overview

DX NetOps offers robust network monitoring capabilities along with AI-driven automation and predictive analytics, making it a valuable tool for ensuring network performance and reliability across hybrid environments.

DX NetOps is designed to provide comprehensive visibility into network infrastructure, focusing on root cause analysis, ease of setup, scalability, and stability. Its features allow for proactive issue identification through custom dashboards, while integration with IT systems ensures seamless connectivity. Performance management and insightful analytics enhance network visibility, aiding resource allocation in hybrid environments. Organizations utilize DX NetOps for monitoring, alerting, and analytics across network devices, benefiting from integration with platforms like ServiceNow.

What are the key features of DX NetOps?

Root Cause Analysis: Identifies network issues efficiently to minimize downtime.
Scalability: Supports expansive networks without compromising performance.
AI-Driven Automation: Streamlines network management tasks using artificial intelligence.
Predictive Analytics: Anticipates potential network problems, enabling proactive measures.
Topological Views: Provides visual insights into network structure and connectivity.
Custom Dashboards: Allows users to tailor views for specific monitoring and analysis needs.

What benefits or ROI should users anticipate?

Enhanced Network Visibility: Improved insights lead to better network performance management.
Proactive Issue Identification: Early detection of issues reduces downtime and service interruptions.
Improved Resource Allocation: Optimizes network resources across hybrid environments.
Seamless IT Integration: Ensures efficient workflows with other systems for better performance tracking.
Infrastructure Planning Support: Assists in preparing for peak periods with detailed analytics.

DX NetOps is widely implemented across telecommunications, financial services, and manufacturing industries. Organizations leverage its capabilities for monitoring extensive network infrastructures, ensuring optimal performance through integration with existing platforms and enhancing decision-making processes with detailed network analytics.

Broadcom

Infraon IMS offers network monitoring with real-time dashboards, customizable GUIs, and integrated tools, supporting device management and workflow automation efficiently.

Infraon IMS delivers stable performance with features tailored for easy customization and detailed network management. Users benefit from real-time monitoring through role-based dashboards and integrated ticketing tools. However, improvements in reporting, GUI usability, and AI integration are needed. Challenges include monitoring non-IPBS devices and improving connectivity visibility. Users require seamless Infraon Desk integration, ease of device addition, and enhanced topology views.

What are the key features of Infraon IMS?

Stable Performance: Provides consistent network oversight.
Customizable Dashboards: Role-based, interactive GUIs for tailored views.
Real-Time Monitoring: Comprehensive network visibility and alerts.
Workflow Automation: Streamlines operational processes.
Configuration Backup: Ensures data integrity and easy recovery.
Granular Reporting: Delivers detailed insights and analysis.
Intuitive Interface: Enhances user interaction and experience.
Quick Device Discovery: Facilitates effective network management.
Email Alerts: Keeps users informed on device status.
CSV Upload: Manages high-volume device data efficiently.

What benefits do users find in Infraon IMS?

Centralized Access: Simplifies firewall and device management.
Enhanced IT Management: Improved monitoring of uptime, downtime, and utilization.
Flexible Deployment: Support for global locations with cloud and on-premises options.
Link Monitoring Automation: Boosts operational efficiency.

In industries like IT infrastructure and data center management, Infraon IMS is utilized for network monitoring and managing key components such as leased lines and firewalls. Its capabilities aid diverse geographical locations in overseeing data centers, offering centralized monitoring and access to critical infrastructure.

EverestIMS

Sample Customers

Fujitsu

Airtel, BSNL, BlackBox Corporation, ACT, Geojit, Canara Bank, Federal Bank, Corporation Bank, Birla Corporation, CESC Limited, Mphasis, GAIL, Udaan, Cowrks, SEBI, PowerGrid, ION, Summit Communications, National Information Technology Center (Nepal), Bhutan National Bank, Servion T, Greenlam, Translab Technologies, CMSIT Services, Nelco, HPCL, Navitas Life Sciences etc.

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps vs. Infraon IMS

September 2026

Free Report: DX NetOps vs. Infraon IMS

Find out what your peers are saying about DX NetOps vs. Infraon IMS and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our DX NetOps vs. Infraon IMS report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.